179 NLRB 87
Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.
SOUTHWEST FOREST INDUSTRIES
87
Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. and International
Brotherhood of Pulp ,
Sulphite and Paper Mill
Workers,
AFL-CIO,'
Petitioner,
Lumber and
Sawmill
Workers
Union
Local
No.
2763,
AFL-CIO,'
Petitioner,
Cases 28-RC-1932 and
28-UC-30
October 13, 1969
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING
PETITION TO CLARIFY UNCERTIFIED
BARGAINING UNIT
BY CHAIRMAN MCCULLOCH AND MEMBERS
FANNING AND JENKINS
Under separate petitions duly filed under Section
9(b) and (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as
amended, a consolidated hearing was held before
Roy H. Garner, Hearing Officer. Following the
hearing, these cases were transferred to the National
Labor
Relations
Board in
Washington,
D.C.,
pursuant to Section 102.67 of the National Labor
Relations
Board
Rules
and
Regulations
and
Statements of Procedure, Series 8, as amended. No
briefs were filed by the parties.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the
National
Labor Relations
Act,
as amended, the
National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
powers in connection
with
these
cases
to
a
three-member panel.
The Board has reviewed the Hearing Officer's
rulings made at the hearing and finds that they were
free from prejudicial error. The rulings are hereby
affirmed.
Upon the entire record in these cases, the Board
finds-
1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within
the meaning of the Act and it will effectuate the
purposes of the Act to assert jurisdiction herein.
2.
The labor organizations involved claim to
represent certain employees of the Employer.
3.
Papermill
Workers seeks to represent, as a
separate
unit,
about
a
dozen
production,
maintenance,
and
shipping
employees
of the
Employer who work in a pulpwood supply yard
located
about a half mile from its sawmill at
McNary, Arizona. Papermill Workers contends that
the pulpwood yard is essentially a new and separate
enterprise,
and that the employees in question
constitute an appropriate unit in which to conduct
an election because they share a community of
interest in their own terms of employment which is
distinct from that of the Employer's lumber and
sawmill
workers (production,
maintenance
and
townsite
employees)
employed
at
the
nearby
sawmill,
who are represented by the Sawmill
Workers.
Sawmill Workers, by a unit-clarification petition,
contends that the same pulpwood yard employees
'Herein called Papermill Workers
'Herein called Sawmill Workers
sought by Papermill Workers constitute an accretion
to their own contract unit of lumber and sawmill
employees
at
McNary;
The
Employer is in
agreement
with the Sawmill
Workers'
position.
Sawmill Workers requests that an order be issued
clarifying
their
uncertified
unit
by specifically
including therein the pulpwood yard employees.
The record shows that the Employer has had a
continuous series of collective-bargaining agreements
with Sawmill Workers since 1937, the most recent
of which was executed in January 1967, effective for
a 3-year term. The contract states in Article One
that its terms and provisions " ....shall apply only
to
the
production,
maintenance
and townsite
employees of the Company in the McNary Wood
Products Division ...."' The Employer established
the pulpwood supply yard in 1962 for the purpose of
storing and shipping to its papermill, 50 miles away,
precut 5-foot pulpwood logs then supplied entirely
by independent lumbering contractors. Only two
individuals were then employed by the Employer at
the yard, their duties being to unload, store, and
reload the precut pulpwood logs for shipment to the
Employer's papermill.
They
were not expressly
included by any specific amendment to the coverage
clause of the Sawmill Workers' contract when the
yard was established or thereafter.
In the fall of 1968, the Employer began itself
harvesting pulpwood logs, the usual length of such
being about 32 feet. In order to cut them to the
5-foot
lengths
supplied
to
its
papermill,
the
Employer bought new cutting equipment and
installed a "slasher" operation at its pulpwood yard.
This change in the supply yard's function, plus a
one-third increase in the volume of pulpwood logs
handled,
created
an
expanded operation which
required employment of 10 additional employees
and a new two-shift operation.
Half of the new
pulpwood yard force was obtained by permanently
transferring employees from the Employer's nearby
logging and sawmill operations to the yard, and the
remainder were hired from other sources by the
McNary Division Personnel Office, which also hires
the logging and sawmill employees for McNary
operations. Pulpwood yard employees, in carrying
out their unloading, loading, storage and cutting
functions, now perform duties quite similar to those
performed by some of the Employer's logging and
sawmill employees, and operate similar cutting,
loading, and unloading equipment. Wage rates paid
pulpwood yard employees are closely comparable
and related to those paid logging and sawmill
employees by the Employer. The record, in this
regard,
shows that in the spring of 1969, an
Employer representative in charge of the pulpwood
yard
"went over" the rates with the Sawmill
'The record shows that the pulpwood supply yard is a part of the
Employer's Wood Procurement Division, which supplies wood to both the
Employer's sawmill and papermill operations It further shows that the
Wood Procurement Division is part of the McNary Wood Products
Division
179
NLRB No. 14
88
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Workers' business agent to obtain his concurrence in
them.
The
pulpwood
yard
obtains
additional
temporary help during peak periods from the
Employer's
sawmill
labor
pool.
At least 29
employees, all covered by the Sawmill Workers'
current agreement with the Employer, have been so
utilized at various times. Pulpwood yard employees
receive the same leave, vacation, holiday, and fringe
benefits
as
sawmill
employees covered by the
Sawmill Workers' agreement, and time worked in
the
yard by sawmill employees, permanently or
temporarily transferred there, has been fully credited
for seniority and vacation purposes. The personnel
office at McNary serves the workers at both the
pulpwood yard and the sawmill.
In
our
opinion,
the
above
circumstances
demonstrate
that
the
pulpwood
supply
yard
employees are in fact an accretion to the Sawmill
Workers' existing unit of production, maintenance
and townsite employees at McNary, Arizona. Thus,
the record shows that the present pulpwood supply
yard was expanded to meet an overall production
need for an increased supply of pulpwood logs. It
has been largely staffed with employees who have
been extended the full protection of the Sawmill
Workers' present contract with the Employer. The
extent of temporary interchange is substantial. All
pulpwood yard employees perform duties similar to
those of the Employer's nearby logging and sawmill
employees at rates closely comparable to those paid
such employees, both groups of employees have
identical fringe benefits and all operational costs of
the pulpwood yard are charged to the Employer's
lumber
manufacturing operation, and not to its
parallel paper production function.
On this record, we shall dismiss the Papermill
Workers' petition filed herein, and shall clarify the
uncertified
unit
of production,
maintenance and
townsite employees represented by Sawmill Workers
at
McNary,
Arizona,
by including therein the
nonsupervisory pulpwood supply yard employees."
ORDER
It
is hereby ordered that the contract unit of
production , maintenance and townsite employees at
the Employer' s McNary, Arizona, Wood Products
Division ,
represented
by
Lumber
&
Sawmill
Workers Union Local No. 2763, AFL-CIO, be, and
it hereby is , clarified by specifically including therein
all
production,
maintenance ,
and
shipping
employees , including working foremen , employed by
the Employer at its pulpwood supply yard located
near McNary, Arizona.'
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition in Case
28-RC-1932 be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
'See Walla Walla Mills , Inc. 164 NLRB No 146, Bear River Lumber
Co . Inc . 150 NLRB 1295, 1297
'The two working foremen employed at the pulpwood yard are included
in the unit, as the present record contains no evidence that they possess
any of the indicia of supervisory authority, and clearly shows that they are
predominantly engaged in routine
manual
work, along with other
pulpwood yard employees Such paper work as they perform is limited to
the keeping of employee time records