Taylor Forge Stainless

Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc. and Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO. Cases 22-CA-19516 and 22-CA-19590 April 19, 1994 DECISION AND ORDER BY MEMBERS STEPHENS, DEVANEY, AND COHEN On December 29, 1993, the Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued an order consolidating cases, consolidated complaint, and notice of hearing alleging that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing the Union's request to bargain following the Union's certification in Case 22-RC-10776. (Official notice is taken of the "record" in the representation proceeding as defined in the Board's Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g); Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent filed an answer admitting in part and denying in part the allegations in the complaint. On March 7, 1994, the Acting General Counsel filed a Motion to the National Labor Relations Board for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support,¹ with exhibits attached. On March 10, 1994, the Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent filed a response. The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. Ruling on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment In its answer the Respondent admits its refusal to bargain, but attacks the validity of the certification on the basis of its objections to conduct affecting the results of the election in the representation proceeding. All representation issues raised by the Respondent were or could have been litigated in the prior representation proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to adduce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special circumstances that would require the Board to reexamine the decision made in the representation proceeding. We, therefore, find that the Respondent has not raised any representation issue that is properly litigable in this unfair labor practice proceeding. See 1 The Acting General Counsel does not seek summary judgment concerning certain allegations of the order consolidating cases, consolidated complaint, and notice of hearing. Rather, summary judgment is sought only as to those portions of the consolidated complaint which relate to the Respondent's refusal to honor the certification in Case 22-RC-10776. Accordingly, the allegations on which the Acting General Counsel does not seek summary judgment (pars. 8-10 of the compalint) are remanded to the Regional Director for further appropriate processing. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941). Accordingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment. On the entire record, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT I. JURISDICTION At all material times the Respondent, a corporation, with an office and place of business in North Branch, New Jersey, has been engaged as a manufacturer of pipe components. During the calendar year ending October 29, 1993, the Respondent, in conducting its operations, sold and shipped from its North Branch, New Jersey facility goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly to points outside the State of New Jersey. We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES A. The Certification Following the election held April 28, 1993, the Union was certified on September 30, 1993, as the collective-bargaining representative of the employees in the following appropriate unit: All full time and regular part-time production, maintenance, warehouse and yard employees employed by the Employer at its North Branch, New Jersey location, but excluding all office clerical employees, managerial employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. The Union continues to be the exclusive representative under Section 9(a) of the Act. B. Refusal to Bargain Since about October 5, 1993, by telephone call, and about October 8, 1993, by letter, the Union has requested the Respondent to bargain, and, since about October 5, 1993, the Respondent has refused. We find that this refusal constitutes an unlawful refusal to bargain in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. CONCLUSION OF LAW By refusing on and after October 5, 1993, to bargain with the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of employees in the appropriate unit, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 313 NLRB No. 191 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REMEDY Having found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and desist, to bargain on request with the Union and, if an understanding is reached, to embody the understanding in a signed agreement. To ensure that the employees are accorded the services of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided by the law, we shall construe the initial period of the certification as beginning the date the Respondent begins to bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB 226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); Burnett Construction Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965). ORDER The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Respondent, Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc., North Branch, New Jersey, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall 1. Cease and desist from (a) Refusing to bargain with Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees in the bargaining unit. (b) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act. 2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act. (a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive representative of the employees in the following appropriate unit on terms and conditions of employment and, if an understanding is reached, embody the understanding in a signed agreement: All full time and regular part-time production, maintenance, warehouse and yard employees employed by the Employer at its North Branch, New Jersey location, but excluding all office clerical employees, managerial employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. (b) Post at its facility in North Branch, New Jersey, copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix." Copies of the notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 22, after being signed by the Respondent's authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent immediately upon receipt and maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. (c) Notify the Regional Director in writing within 20 days from the date of this Order what steps the Respondent has taken to comply. Dated, Washington, D.C. April 19, 1994 James M. Stephens, Member Dennis M. Devaney, Member Charles I. Cohen, Member (SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD APPENDIX NOTICE To EMPLOYEES POSTED BY ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD An Agency of the United States Government The National Labor Relations Board has found that we violated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to post and abide by this notice. WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain with Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO as the exclusive representative of the employees in the bargaining unit. WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act. We will, on request, bargain with the Union and put in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and conditions of employment for our employees in the bargaining unit: All full time and regular part-time production, maintenance, warehouse and yard employees employed by us at our North Branch, New Jersey location, but excluding all office clerical employees, managerial employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. ²If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of appeals, the words in the notice reading "Posted by Order of the National Labor Relations Board" shall read "Posted Pursuant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board." TAYLOR FORGE STAINLESS, INC.