Mate Creek Loading, Inc.

327 NLRB No. 193 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Board volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex- ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. 20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can be included in the bound volumes. Mate Creek Loading, Inc. and Local Union 6105, United Mine Workers of America, AFL–CIO and International Union, United Mine Workers of America, AFL–CIO. Cases 9–CA–36251–1 and 9–CA–36251–2 March 31, 1999 DECISION AND ORDER BY CHAIRMAN TRUESDALE AND MEMBERS HURTGEN AND BRAME Upon charges filed by Local 6105, United Mine Workers of America, AFL–CIO (Local 6105) in Case 9– CA–36251–1 on September 8, 1998, and by the Interna- tional Union, United Mine Workers of America, AFL– CIO (the International Union or the Union) in Case 9– CA–36251–2 on September 17, 1998, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued an order consolidating cases, consolidated complaint on November 10, 1998, against Mate Creek Loading, Inc., the Respondent, alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act. Although properly served copies of the charges and consolidated complaint, the Respondent failed to file an answer. On March 3, 1999, the General Counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with the Board. On March 5, 1999, the Board issued an order transferring the pro- ceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent filed no response. The allegations in the motion are therefore undisputed. The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations provide that the allegations in the complaint shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause is shown. In addition, the consolidated complaint af- firmatively notes that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of service, all the allegations in the consolidated complaint will be considered admitted. Further, the un- disputed allegations in the Motion for Summary Judg- ment disclose that the Region, by letter dated February 11, 1999, notified the Respondent that unless an answer were received by February 22, 1999, a Motion for Sum- mary Judgment would be filed. In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail- ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun- sel’s Motion for Summary Judgment. On the entire record, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT I. JURISDICTION At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation, has engaged in the operation of a coal preparation plant in Raleigh County, West Virginia. During the 12-month period preceding the issuance of the consolidated com- plaint, the Respondent, in conducting its operations de- scribed above, performed services within the State of West Virginia valued in excess of $50,000 for Mid- Atlantic Resources Corporation. Also, during that same period, Mid-Atlantic Resources Corportaion, with an office and principal place of business at Beckley, West Virginia, has been engaged in the mining and sale of coal and sold and shipped goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly from its West Virginia locations to points outside the State of West Virginia. We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and that Local 6105 and the International Union are labor organization within the meaning of Sec- tion 2(5) of the Act. II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES The following employees of the Respondent (the unit) constitute a unit appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act: All employees of [Respondent] engaged in the produc- tion of coal, including removal of overburden and coal waste, preparation, processing, and cleaning of coal, repair and maintenance work normally performed at the mine site and maintenance of gob piles excluding all professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. Since about January 9, 1997, and at all material times, the International Union has been the designated exclu- sive collective-bargaining representative of the unit and since that date has been recognized as such representa- tive by the Respondent. This recognition has been em- bodied in a collective-bargaining agreement between the Respondent and the International Union which is effec- tive from February 1, 1997, to January 31, 2002. At all material times since about January 9, 1997, based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the International Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining representa- tive of the unit. Since about March 1998, the Respondent has failed to continue in full force and effect all the terms and condi- tions of the agreement described above by failing to pro- vide health insurance benefits pursuant to article XVII(a) of the agreement; failing to provide 401(k) plan pension benefits in accordance with article XVII(c) of the agree- ment; and failing to withhold selective strike assessments from employees’ pay and remit such withholdings to the DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 2 International Union in accordance with article XIII of the agreement. Although the terms and conditions of employment de- scribed above are mandatory subjects for the purpose of collective bargaining, the Respondent has engaged in the conduct described above without the International Un- ion’s consent. CONCLUSION OF LAW By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon- dent has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively with the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of its employees, and has thereby engaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Sec- tion 8(a)(1), (5), and (d) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. REMEDY Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer- tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing since March 1998 to continue in full force and effect the terms and conditions of the 1997– 2002 agreement, by failing to provide health insurance benefits and 401(k) plan pension benefits pursuant to articles XVII(a) and XVII(c) of the agreement, we shall order the Respondent to comply with the terms and con- ditions of the 1997–2002 agreement, and to make whole its unit employees by providing all contractually required health insurance benefits and by making 401(k) plan pension benefits payments or contributions, including any additional amounts applicable to such delinquent payments as determined pursuant to Merryweather Opti- cal Co., 240 NLRB 1213, 1216 (1979). In addition, the Respondent shall reimburse unit employees for any ex- penses ensuing from its failure to make such required payments or contributions, as set forth in Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252 NLRB 891 fn. 2. (1980), enfd. mem. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981), such amounts to be computed in the manner set forth in Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB 632 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with interest as prescribed in New Horizons for the Re- tarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).1 Furthermore, having found that the Respondent vio- lated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing since March 1998, to withhold selective strike assessments from em- ployees’ pay and remit such withholdings to the Union in accordance with article XIII of the 1997–2002 agree- ment, we shall order the Respondent to withhold the as- 1 To the extent that an employee has made personal contributions to a fund that are accepted by the fund in lieu of the employer’s delin- quent contributions during the period of the delinquency, the respon- dent will reimburse the employee, but the amount of such reimburse- ment will constitute a setoff to the amount that the respondent other- wise owes the fund. sessments and remit such withholdings to the Union as required by the 1997–2002 agreement, and to reimburse the Union for its failure to do so, with interest as pre- scribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Respondent, Mate Creek Loading, Inc., Raleigh County, West Virginia, its officers, agents, successors, and as- signs, shall 1.Cease and desist from (a) Failing to bargain with the International Union, United Mine Workers of America, AFL–CIO as the ex- clusive representative of the employees in the appropriate unit set forth below, by failing and refusing to continue in full force and effect the terms and conditions of the 1997–2002 agreement by failing to provide health insur- ance benefits and 401(k) plan pension benefits payments or contributions and failing to withhold selective strike assessments from the pay of employees who have authorized withholding and remit such withholdings to the Union pursuant to articles XVII(c), XVII(a), and XIII of the agreement. The unit is: All employees of [Respondent] engaged in the produc- tion of coal, including removal of overburden and coal waste, preparation, processing, and cleaning of coal, repair and maintenance work normally performed at the mine site and maintenance of gob piles excluding all professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. (b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re- straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act. 2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act. (a) Comply with the terms and conditions of the 1997– 2002 agreement by providing all contractually required health insurance benefits and by making 401(k) plan pension benefits payments or contributions retroactive to March 1998, and make whole the unit employees for any loss of benefits or expenses ensuing from its failure, since March 1998, to provide these benefits pursuant to articles XVII(c) and XVII(a) of the agreement, with in- terest, as set forth in the remedy section of this decision. (b) Withhold and remit authorized union selective strike assessments from employees’ pay as required by the 1997–2002 agreement since March 1998, and reim- burse the Union for its failure to do so, with interest, in the manner set forth in the remedy section of this deci- sion. MATE CREEK LOADING, INC. 3 (c) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, make available to the Board or its agents for examination and copying, all payroll records, social security payment rec- ords, timecards, personnel records and reports, and all other records necessary to analyze the amount of back- pay due under the terms of this Order. (d) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at its facility in Raleigh County, West Virginia, copies of the attached notice marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 9, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respon- dent and maintained for 60 consecutive days in con- spicuous places including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to ensure that the no- tices are not altered, defaced or covered by any other material. In the event that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facility involved in these proceedings, the Re- spondent shall duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all current employees and former employees employed by the Respondent at any time since March 1998. (e) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re- sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at- testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to comply. Dated, Washington, D.C. March 31, 1999 John C. Truesdale Chairman Peter J. Hurtgen, Member J. Robert Brame III, Member (SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 2 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na- tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg- ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.” APPENDIX NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES POSTED BY ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD An Agency of the United States Government The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio- lated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to post and abide by this notice. WE WILL NOT fail to bargain with the International Union, United Mine Workers of America, AFL–CIO as the exclusive representative of the employees in the ap- propriate unit set forth below, by failing and refusing to continue in full force and effect the terms and conditions of the 1997–2002 agreement by failing to provide health insurance benefits and 401(k) plan pension benefits payments or contributions and failing to withhold selec- tive strike assessments from the pay of employees who have authorized withholding and remit such withholdings to the Union pursuant to articles XVII(c), XVII(a), and XIII of the agreement. The unit is: All employees of [us] engaged in the production of coal, including removal of overburden and coal waste, preparation, processing, and cleaning of coal, repair and maintenance work normally performed at the mine site and maintenance of gob piles excluding all profes- sional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act. WE WILL comply with the terms and conditions of the 1997–2002 agreement by providing all contractually re- quired health insurance benefits and by making 401(k) plan pension benefits payments or contributions retroac- tive to March 1998, and WE WILL make whole the unit employees for any loss of benefits or expenses ensuing from our failure, since March 1998, to provide these benefits pursuant to articles XVII(c) and XVII(a) of the 1997–2002 agreement, with interest. WE WILL withhold and remit authorized union selective strike assessments from employees’ pay as required by the 1997–2002 agreement since March 1998 and reim- burse the Union for our failure to do so, with interest. MATE CREEK LOADING, INC.