334 NLRB 92

J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.

Last amended: 2001Year: 2001Length: 271 wordsOfficial source
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT 343 J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Teamsters Local Union No. 17 a/w International Brotherhood of Team- sters, AFL–CIO. Case 4–CA–29035 June 22, 2001 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER The Board’s Decision and Order in this matter issued on May 23, 2001.1 The Board considered Respondent’s timely filed exceptions and the General Counsel’s an- swering brief timely filed on May 16, 2001. Although Section 102.46(h) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations provides the parties with an opportunity to file a reply brief within 14 days from the due date for answering briefs, the Board’s decision issued only 7 days following the filing of the answering brief. Respondent, on June 1, 2001, filed a motion to set aside Decision and Order pending submission and consideration of Respondent’s reply brief. 1 334 NLRB 89. It is clear that the Board’s Rules provide all parties a right to file a reply brief to an answering brief and that such a brief can be filed anytime within 14 days of the due date for the answering brief. Respondent here did not waive that right. Therefore, the May 23, 2001 deci- sion issued prematurely and must be set aside. Accord- ingly, Respondent’s motion is granted and the Board decision reported at 334 NLRB 89 is vacated for all pur- poses, including precedential effect.2 In the event any party desires to file a reply brief to the counsel for the General Counsel’s answering brief, such reply briefs are due in Washington, D.C., within 14 days from the date of this decision. By Direction of the Board. 2 See Caterpillar, Inc., 332 NLRB 1116 (2000). 334 NLRB No. 54
334 NLRB 92: J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. | Justis AI