364 NLRB No. 143
Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC d/b/a Trump International Hotel Las Vegas
364 NLRB No. 143
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC d/b/a Trump Inter-
national Hotel Las Vegas and Local Joint Execu-
tive Board of Las Vegas, affiliated with Unite
Here International Union. Case 28–CA–181475
November 3, 2016
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN PEARCE AND MEMBERS MISCIMARRA
AND MCFERRAN
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Re-
spondent is contesting the Union’s certification as bar-
gaining representative in the underlying representation
proceeding. Pursuant to a charge filed on August 4,
2016, by Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, af-
filiated with UNITE HERE International Union (the Un-
ion), the General Counsel issued the complaint on Au-
gust 17, 2016, alleging that Trump Ruffin Commercial,
LLC d/b/a Trump International Hotel Las Vegas (the
Respondent) has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the
Act by refusing the Union’s request to recognize and
bargain with it following the Union’s certification in
Case 28–RC–153650. (Official notice is taken of the
record in the representation proceeding as defined in the
Board’s Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and
102.69(d). Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The
Respondent filed an answer admitting in part and deny-
ing in part the allegations in the complaint, and asserting
affirmative defenses.
On September 1, 2016, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment. On September 2, 2016,
the Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to
the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion
should not be granted. The Respondent filed a response,
and the Union also filed a response joining the General
Counsel’s motion.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
The Respondent admits its refusal to bargain, but con-
tests the validity of the certification of representative
based on its objections to the election in the underlying
representation proceeding.
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941).1
Accordingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judg-
ment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent has been a lim-
ited liability company with an office and place of busi-
ness in Las Vegas, Nevada (the Respondent’s facility)
and has been engaged in operating a hotel providing food
and lodging.
During the 12-month period ending August 4, 2016,
the Respondent, in conducting its operations described
above, purchased and received at its facility goods valued
in excess of $50,000 directly from points located outside
the State of Nevada, and derived gross revenues in ex-
cess of $500,000.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organization
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the representation election held on Decem-
ber 4 and 5, 2015, the Union was certified on March 21,
2016,2 as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the employees in the following appropriate unit:
All full-time, regular part-time, and on-call employees
in housekeeping, food and beverage (including all pool
employees), and guest services employed by the Em-
ployer at the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas,
Nevada; excluding all other employees including but
not limited to front-desk employees, engineering and
maintenance employees, office clerical employees,
sales and marketing employees, security employees,
human resources employees, finance employees, reve-
nue employees, reservations, gift shop, spa, concierge
1 Member Miscimarra agrees that summary judgment is appropriate
in this unfair labor practice case because the Respondent has not pre-
sented any new matters that were not previously resolved in the prior
representation case. Member Miscimarra did not participate in the
prior representation case, and does not reach or pass on the merits of
the Board’s decision in that case.
2 The original Decision and Certification of Representative, issued
by the Regional Director on March 21, 2016, inadvertently omitted
from the description of the unit the unit exclusions set forth in the stipu-
lated election agreement. Accordingly, on August 16, 2016, the Re-
gional Director issued a corrected Certification of Representative, cor-
recting the description of the unit.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
2
and owner/guest relations, PBX, confidential employ-
ees, managerial employees, guards, and all supervisors
as defined under the Act.
The Union continues to be the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit employees under
Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
At all material times, Brian Baudreau has held the po-
sition of Managing Director and has been a supervisor of
the Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(11) of
the Act and an agent of the Respondent within the mean-
ing of Section 2(13) of the Act.
About March 22, 2016, the Union requested that the
Respondent recognize and bargain collectively with the
Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the unit. Since about March 29, 2016, the Re-
spondent has failed and refused to do so.
We find that the Respondent’s conduct constitutes an
unlawful failure and refusal to recognize and bargain
with the Union in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of
the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By failing and refusing since March 29, 2016 to rec-
ognize and bargain with the Union as the exclusive col-
lective-bargaining representative of employees in the
appropriate unit, the Respondent has engaged in unfair
labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning
of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the
Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to recognize and bargain on request with the Un-
ion and, if an understanding is reached, to embody the
understanding in a signed agreement.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifi-
cation as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); accord Burnett Construction
Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57
(10th Cir. 1965); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB 226, 229
(1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied
379 U.S. 817 (1964).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC d/b/a
Trump International Hotel Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Neva-
da, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to recognize and bargain with
Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, affiliated
with UNITE HERE International Union as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the employees in
the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclu-
sive collective-bargaining representative of the employ-
ees in the following appropriate unit on terms and condi-
tions of employment and, if an understanding is reached,
embody the understanding in a signed agreement:
All full-time, regular part-time, and on-call employees
in housekeeping, food and beverage (including all pool
employees), and guest services employed by the Em-
ployer at the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas,
Nevada; excluding all other employees including but
not limited to front-desk employees, engineering and
maintenance employees, office clerical employees,
sales and marketing employees, security employees,
human resources employees, finance employees, reve-
nue employees, reservations, gift shop, spa, concierge
and owner/guest relations, PBX, confidential employ-
ees, managerial employees, guards, and all supervisors
as defined under the Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Las Vegas, Nevada, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 28,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places,
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. In addition to physical posting of paper
notices, notices shall be distributed electronically, such
as by email, posting on an intranet or an internet site,
and/or other electronic means, if the Respondent custom-
arily communicates with its employees by such means.
Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to
ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or cov-
3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC D/B/A TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LAS VEGAS
3
ered by any other material. If the Respondent has gone
out of business or closed the facility involved in these
proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and mail, at
its own expense, a copy of the notice to all current em-
ployees and former employees employed by the Re-
spondent at any time since March 29, 2016.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director for Region 28 a sworn certifi-
cation of a responsible official on a form provided by the
Region attesting to the steps that the Respondent has
taken to comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. November 3, 2016
______________________________________
Mark Gaston Pearce,
Chairman
______________________________________
Philip A. Miscimarra,
Member
______________________________________
Lauren McFerran,
Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and
obey this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to recognize and bargain
with Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, affiliat-
ed with UNITE HERE International Union as the exclu-
sive collective-bargaining representative of our employ-
ees in the bargaining unit.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
listed above.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put
in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the fol-
lowing appropriate bargaining unit:
All full-time, regular part-time, and on-call employees
in housekeeping, food and beverage (including all pool
employees), and guest services employed by the Em-
ployer at the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas,
Nevada; excluding all other employees including but
not limited to front-desk employees, engineering and
maintenance employees, office clerical employees,
sales and marketing employees, security employees,
human resources employees, finance employees, reve-
nue employees, reservations, gift shop, spa, concierge
and owner/guest relations, PBX, confidential employ-
ees, managerial employees, guards, and all supervisors
as defined under the Act.
TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL,
LLC
D/B/A
TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL LAS VEGAS
The
Board’s
decision
can
be
found
at
www.nlrb.gov/case/28-CA-181475 or by using the QR code
below. Alternatively, you can obtain a copy of the decision
from the Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations
Board, 1015 Half Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20570, or
by calling (202) 273–1940.