370 NLRB No. 54
National Stores, Inc. d/b/a Factory 2-U
370 NLRB No. 54
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
National Stores, Inc. d/b/a Factory 2-U and Abigail
Martinez. Case 28–CA–231771
December 9, 2020
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN RING AND MEMBERS KAPLAN AND
MCFERRAN
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that National Stores, Inc. d/b/a Factory
2-U (the Respondent) has failed to file an answer to the
complaint. Upon a charge filed by Abigail Martinez on
November 26, 2018, the General Counsel issued a com-
plaint and notice of hearing on May 29, 2020, against the
Respondent, alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(1) of
the Act. The Respondent failed to file an answer.
On September 28, 2020, the General Counsel filed with
the National Labor Relations Board a Motion for Default
Judgment. On September 29, 2020, the Board issued an
order transferring the proceeding to the Board and a No-
tice to Show Cause why the motion should not be granted.
On October 27, 2020, the Board issued a Supplemental
Notice to Show Cause, attempting service on the Re-
spondent at an additional address. The Respondent filed
no response to either notice. The allegations in the motion
are therefore undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in a complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is shown.
In addition, the complaint affirmatively states that unless
an answer is received on or before June 12, 2020, the
Board may find, pursuant to a motion for default judg-
ment, that the allegations in the complaint are true. Fur-
ther, the undisputed allegations in the General Counsel’s
1 The General Counsel’s motion for default judgment and attached
exhibits indicate that the July 24 reminder letter, sent by regular mail to
the Respondent’s facility in Nogales, Arizona, was returned on August 5
with a U.S. Postal Service notation indicating that delivery had been at-
tempted but was not successful for an unknown reason. The General
Counsel sent the August 20 reminder letter by regular mail to the Re-
spondent’s facility and to an additional address at 15001 S. Figueroa
Street, Gardena, California. This California address was listed as the
Respondent’s address in the California Secretary of State records, and as
the address for FP Stores, Inc., owner of the trade name Factory 2-U, in
the Arizona Corporation Commission records. On August 26, the letter
sent to the Respondent’s facility was returned to the General Counsel as
motion disclose that the Region, by letter dated July 24,
2020 (which enclosed a copy of the complaint), advised
the Respondent that unless an answer was received by July
31, 2020, a motion for default judgment would be filed;
and, by letter dated August 20, 2020 (which enclosed a
copy of the complaint), advised the Respondent that un-
less an answer was received by August 27, 2020, a motion
for default judgment would be filed. Nevertheless, the Re-
spondent failed to file an answer.1
In the absence of good cause being shown for the failure
to file an answer, we deem the allegations of the complaint
to be admitted as true, and we grant the General Counsel’s
Motion for Default Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent has been a corpo-
ration with an office and place of business in Nogales, Ar-
izona (the Respondent’s facility), and has been engaged in
the business of operating a retail store.
During the 12-month period ending November 26,
2018, the Respondent, in conducting its operations de-
scribed above, purchased and received at its facility goods
valued in excess of $50,000 directly from points outside
the State of Arizona, and derived gross revenues in excess
of $500,000.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7)
of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held the
positions set forth opposite their respective names and
have been supervisors of the Respondent within the mean-
ing of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the Respond-
ent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the Act:
Lisa Hill
-
District Manager
Susana Mitschke
-
Store Manager
Kendra Galaviz
-
Supervisor
“temporarily away” and “unable to forward.” However, the letter sent to
the California address was not returned as undeliverable.
It is well settled that a respondent’s failure or refusal to accept certi-
fied mail or to provide for appropriate service cannot serve to defeat the
purposes of the Act. See, e.g., Cray Construction Group, LLC, 341
NLRB 944, 944 fn. 5 (2004); I.C.E. Electric, Inc., 339 NLRB 247, 247
fn. 2 (2003). Further, the failure of the postal service to return documents
served by regular mail indicates actual receipt of those documents by the
Respondent. Id.; Lite Flight, Inc., 285 NLRB 649, 650 (1987), enfd. sub
nom. NLRB v. Sherman, 843 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1988).
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
2
The following events occurred, giving rise to this pro-
ceeding.
1. (a) From about December 2017 through about No-
vember 15, 2018, the Respondent’s employee Martinez
engaged in concerted activities with other employees for
the purposes of mutual aid and protection by, among other
ways, discussing concerns about the Respondent not pay-
ing its employees for all hours worked and denying its em-
ployees from taking their lunch breaks, and bringing those
concerns to the Respondent.
(b) About the last week of September 2018 or the first
week of October 2018, a more precise date being unknown
to the General Counsel, the Respondent, by Kendra
Galaviz, at the Respondent’s facility, threatened its em-
ployees by telling them not to contact upper-level man-
agement because they engaged in concerted activities.
(c) About the first week of November 2018, a more
precise date being unknown to the General Counsel, the
Respondent reduced the work hours of its employee Mar-
tinez.
(d) About the first week of November 2018, a more
precise date being unknown to the General Counsel, the
Respondent changed the work schedule of its employee
Martinez.
(e) About November 21, 2018, the Respondent dis-
charged its employee Martinez.
2. The Respondent engaged in the conduct described
above in paragraphs 1(c) through 1(e) because Martinez
engaged in the conduct described above in paragraph 1(a),
and to discourage employees from engaging in these or
other concerted activities.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
By the conduct described above in paragraph 1, the Re-
spondent has been interfering with, restraining, and coerc-
ing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in
Section 7 of the Act in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the
Act. The unfair labor practices of the Respondent de-
scribed above affect commerce within the meaning of Sec-
tion 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by dis-
charging employee Abigail Martinez for engaging in pro-
tected concerted activity, we shall order the Respondent to
reinstate Martinez and make her whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of the un-
lawful discrimination against her. Backpay shall be com-
puted in accordance with F. W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB
289 (1950), with interest at the rate prescribed in New Ho-
rizons, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987), compounded daily as pre-
scribed in Kentucky River Medical Center, 356 NLRB 6
(2010).
In accordance with our decision in King Soopers, Inc.,
364 NLRB No. 93 (2016), enfd. in relevant part 859 F.3d
23 (D.C. Cir. 2017), we shall also order the Respondent to
compensate Martinez for her search-for-work and interim
employment expenses regardless of whether those ex-
penses exceed interim earnings. Search-for-work and in-
terim employment expenses shall be calculated separately
from taxable net backpay, with interest at the rate pre-
scribed in New Horizons, supra, compounded daily as pre-
scribed in Kentucky River Medical Center, supra.
Having found that the Respondent unlawfully reduced
the hours worked by Martinez, we shall order the Re-
spondent to make her whole for any losses suffered as a
result of the reduction in her hours in the manner set forth
in Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with interest at the rate pre-
scribed in New Horizons, supra, compounded daily as pre-
scribed in Kentucky River Medical Center, supra.
In addition, we shall order the Respondent to compen-
sate Martinez for any adverse tax consequences of receiv-
ing a lump-sum backpay award and to file a report with
the Regional Director for Region 28 allocating the back-
pay award to the appropriate calendar years. AdvoServ of
New Jersey, Inc., 363 NLRB No. 143 (2016).
The Respondent shall also be required to remove from
its files any reference to the unlawful discharge of Mar-
tinez and to notify her in writing that this has been done
and that the unlawful discharge will not be used against
her in any way.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Re-
spondent, National Stores, Inc. d/b/a Factory 2-U,
Nogales, Arizona, its officers, agents, successors, and as-
signs shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Threatening employees by telling them not to con-
tact upper-level management because they engage in pro-
tected concerted activities.
(b) Reducing the work hours of employees because
they engage in protected concerted activities and to dis-
courage other employees from engaging in these activi-
ties.
(c) Changing the work schedules of employees because
they engage in protected concerted activities and to dis-
courage other employees from engaging in these activi-
ties.
(d) Discharging or otherwise discriminating against
employees because they engaged in protected concerted
NATIONAL STORES, INC. D/B/A FACTORY 2-U
3
activities and to discourage other employees from engag-
ing in these activities.
(e) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, offer
Abigail Martinez full reinstatement to her former job or, if
that job no longer exists, to a substantially equivalent po-
sition, without prejudice to her seniority or any other
rights or privileges previously enjoyed.
(b) Make Abigail Martinez whole for any loss of earn-
ings or benefits suffered as a result of the discrimination
against her, in the manner set forth in the remedy section
of this decision.
(c) Make Abigail Martinez whole for any loss of earn-
ings or benefits suffered as a result of the unlawful reduc-
tion of her work hours, in the manner set forth in the rem-
edy section of this decision.
(d) Compensate Abigail Martinez for the adverse tax
consequences, if any, of receiving a lump-sum backpay
award, and file with the Regional Director for Region 28,
within 21 days of the date the amount of backpay is fixed,
either by agreement or Board order, a report allocating the
backpay award to the appropriate calendar years.
(e) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, remove
from its files any reference to the unlawful discharge of
Abigail Martinez, and within 3 days thereafter, notify her
in writing that this has been done and that the discharge
will not be used against her in any way.
(f) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, social
security payment records, timecards, personnel records
and reports, and all other records including an electronic
copy of such records if stored in electronic form, neces-
sary to analyze the amount of backpay due under the terms
of this Order.
(g) Post at its facility in Nogales, Arizona, copies of the
attached notice marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the no-
tice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Re-
gion 28, after being signed by the Respondent's authorized
representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
2 If the facility involved in these proceedings is open and staffed by a
substantial complement of employees, the notices must be posted within
14 days after service by the Region. If the facility involved in these pro-
ceedings is closed due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
pandemic, the notices must be posted within 14 days after the facility
reopens and a substantial complement of employees have returned to
work, and the notices may not be posted until a substantial complement
of employees have returned to work. Any delay in the physical posting
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places,
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. In addition to physical posting of paper
notices, notices shall be distributed electronically, such as
by email, posting on an intranet or an internet site, and/or
other electronic means, if the Respondent customarily
communicates with its employees by such means. Rea-
sonable steps shall be taken by the Respondent to ensure
that the notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any
other material. If the Respondent has gone out of business
or closed the facility involved in these proceedings, the
Respondent shall duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a
copy of the notice to all current employees and former em-
ployees employed by the Respondent at any time since the
last week of September 2018.
(h) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file with
the Regional Director for Region 28 a sworn certification
of a responsible official on a form provided by the Region
attesting to the steps that the Respondent has taken to com-
ply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. December 9, 2020
______________________________________
John F. Ring,
Chairman
______________________________________
Marvin E. Kaplan, Member
________________________________________
Lauren McFerran
Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vi-
olated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and
obey this notice.
of paper notices also applies to the electronic distribution of the notice if
the Respondent customarily communicates with its employees by elec-
tronic means. If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States
court of appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
4
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on your
behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected ac-
tivities.
WE WILL NOT threaten you by telling you not to contact
upper-level management because you engage in protected
concerted activities.
WE WILL NOT reduce the work hours of any of you be-
cause you engage in protected concerted activities and to
discourage other employees from engaging in these activ-
ities.
WE WILL NOT change the work schedules of any of you
because you engage in protected concerted activities and
to discourage other employees from engaging in these ac-
tivities.
WE WILL NOT discharge or otherwise discriminate
against any of you because you engage in protected con-
certed activities and to discourage other employees from
engaging in these activities.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
listed above.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of the Board’s
Order, offer Abigail Martinez full reinstatement to her for-
mer job or, if that job no longer exists, to a substantially
equivalent position without prejudice to her seniority or
any other rights or privileges previously enjoyed.
WE WILL make Abigail Martinez whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of the dis-
crimination against her, less any net interim earnings, plus
interest, and WE WILL also make her whole for reasonable
search-for-work and interim employment expenses, plus
interest.
WE WILL make Abigail Martinez whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of our un-
lawful reduction in her hours of work, plus interest.
WE WILL compensate Abigail Martinez for the adverse
tax consequences, if any, of receiving a lump-sum back-
pay award, and WE WILL file with the Regional Director
for Region 28, within 21 days of the date the amount of
backpay is fixed, either by agreement or Board order, a
report allocating the backpay award to the appropriate cal-
endar years.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of the Board’s
Order, remove from our files any reference to our unlaw-
ful discharge of Abigail Martinez and WE WILL, within 3
days thereafter, notify her in writing that this has been
done and that the discharge will not be used against her in
any way.
NATIONAL STORES, INC. D/B/A FACTORY
2-U
The
Board’s
decision
can
be
found
at
www.nlrb.gov/case/28-CA-231771 or by using the QR
code below. Alternatively, you can obtain a copy of the
decision from the Executive Secretary, National Labor
Relations Board, 1015 Half Street, S.E., Washington, D.C.
20570, or by calling (202) 273-1940.