024 NLRB 306
Dreamland Bedding & Upholstery Co.
In the Matter of DREAMLAND BEDDING & UPHOLSTERY CO., JOHN )HEY
COMPANY, PACIFIC FELT COMPANY, ROME Co., INC., RuTHERFORD &
HOOD, SAN FRANCISCO BEDDING COMPANY, SUNSET FEATHER COMPANY,
WILSON & JANSEN and UNITED FURNITURE WORKERS OF AMERICA,
CIO, #262, FURNITURE WORKERS UNION #1541, A. F. of L.
Cases Nos. RE-7 to RE-13, inclusive
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION
AND
SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECTION
June 3,1940
On April 19, 1940, the National Labor Relations Board, herein
called the Board, issued a Decision and Direction of Elections in the
above-entitled cases?
The Direction of Elections directed that sepa-
rate elections by secret ballot be held among certain employees of
seven employers therein named, including an election among all
employees of Pacific Felt Company, San Francisco, California, a cor-
poration, herein called the Company, engaged in the fabricating, re-
pairing, renovating, assembling, or handling of furniture and bedding
or parts thereof, including foremen engaged generally as working fore-
men, helpers, apprentices, maintenance men, and all other workers, but
excluding executives, salesman, truck drivers, general office employees,
shipping clerks, non-working foremen engaged generally in super-
visory non-working duties, and foremen who take no part in the fabri-
cating, repairing, renovating, assembling, or handling of furniture,
bedding, or parts thereof, who were employed by the Company dur-
ing the pay-roll period last preceding the date of the hearing, includ-
ing employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because
they were ill or on vacation, or who were then or have since been tem-
porarily laid off, but excluding persons who have since quit or have
been discharged for cause, to determine whether such employees de-
sired to be represented by United Furniture Workers of America,
Local #262, C. I. 0., herein called the United, or by Furniture
1 22 N. L. R. B. 1120; 23 N. L. R. B. 948.
24 N. L. R. B., No. 21.
306
DREAMLAND BEDDING.& UPHOLSTERY CO.
307
Workers Union, Local #1541, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and
Joiners of America, A. F. of L., herein called the Furniture Workers,
for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither.
Pursuant to the Direction of Elections, an election by secret ballot
was conducted among the aforesaid employees 'of the Company on
April 26, 1940, under the direction and supervision of the Regional
Director for the Twentieth Region (San Francisco, California).
On
May 3, 1940, the Regional Director, acting pursuant to Article III,
Section.9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-
Series 2, as amended, issued and duly served upon the parties an Elec-
tion Report upon the secret ballot.
As to the ballot and its results, the Regional Director reported as
follows:
Total number eligible to vote-------------------------------
19
Number of votes for Furniture Workers Union, Local 1541,
A. F. L----------------------------------------------------
8
Number of votes for United Furniture Workers of America,
Local 262, C. I. 0----------------------------------------
9
Number of votes for neither---------------------------------
0
Total number of votes counted------------------------------
17
Number of blank ballots------------------------------------
0
Number of void ballots-------------------------------------
0
Number of challenged ballots--------------------------------
1
The Regional Director further reported that the United challenged
the ballot of Harold Ocken on the ground that Ocken was not an
employee, within the meaning of the Direction of Elections.
Ocken
was listed on the eligibility list submitted by the Company but was
employed by another employer on the date of the election. The
Furniture Workers opposed a sustention by the Board of the chal-
lenge on the ground that Ocken was an employee within the meaning
of said Direction.
The Regional Director in her Election Report
ruled that Ocken was an employee and recommended that his vote
be counted.
Thereafter, on May 6, 1940, the United duly filed objections to the
Election Report, alleging that "the contemplated counting of the
challenged ballot ... is without support, and is contrary to the evi-
dence ... and if counted would be the equivalent to the vote of a non-
employee of the Company," and requesting "that an investigation be
conducted, and that a hearing be held in respect to the objections and
that the vote of Ocken be not counted ..."
On May 10, 1940, the Regional Director issued a Report on Objec-
tions, copies of which were duly served on the parties, in which she
reported "that the objections were limited solely to the question
308
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
presented in the challenge of 0cken's ballot"; that an investigation
for the purpose of ruling on this challenge had been conducted and the
results thereof had been embodied in the Election Report; and that
the Objections "do not raise substantial and material issues with ,re-
spect to the conduct of the ballot."
The results of the investigation as embodied in the Election Report
show that Ocken was second on a list of eight :persons regularly called
upon when the Company needed additional help; that he had been
irregularly employed by the Company as a common laborer since May
30, 1939; that his work is considered satisfactory by the Company and
it plans to continue calling him when he is needed; that Ocken's last
employment with the Company ceased on March 29, 1940, and on
April 9, 1940, Ocken commenced work for another company and was
so employed on the date of the election; that this other employment
will be of short duration and Ocken still considers himself an employee
of the Company.
We do not interpret the Objections filed by the
United as challenging these facts, but as tendering the issue whether
under these circumstances Ocken was entitled to participate in the
election.
In analogous cases the Board has held that laid-off employees who
pending their recall to work have found employment elsewhere, re-
tain their status as laid-off employees and may be eligible to vote,
despite the intervening period of work with another employer.2
The
Direction of Elections provides that employees "who ,were .employed
by the Company during the pay-roll period last preceding the date of
the hearing, including employees ... who were ,then or have since been
temporarily laid 'off" are eligible to vote.
We are of the opinion, and
find, that Harold Ocken was :a "laid off" employee at the time of the
election, within the meaning •of the Direction, and therefore was
eligible to vote.
Accordingly, we hereby sustain the rulings, findings,
and recommendations of the Regional Director in her Election Report
and in her Report on Objections and deny the request of the United
for a further 'hearing.
We shall direct that the challenged ballot be
counted.
DIRECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) .of the National Labor Relations
Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and.9,of Na-
2 In the Matter of Paragon Rubber Co.-American Character Doll Company
and Toy
Novelty Workers Organizing Committee of the •C. I. 0., 6 N. L. R. B. 23.
DREAMLAND BEDDING & UPHOLSTERY CO.
309
tional Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as
amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation directed by the Board
to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining
with Pacific. Felt Company, San Francisco, California, the Regional
Director for the Twentieth Region (San Francisco, California) shall,
pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the Board set forth above
and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules, within ten (10)
days from the date of this Direction open and count the ballot of
Harold Ocken, and shall thereafter prepare and cause to be served
upon the parties in this case, her Supplemental Election Report em-
bodying her findings thereon and her recommendations as to the results
of the secret ballot.
28:o35--42-vol. 24 -- 21