035 NLRB 373
The Texas Co.
In the Matter of THE TEXAS COMPANY, WEST DALLAS WORKS and
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LooAL No. 472
Case No. R=9914.Decided September 12, 1941
Jurisdiction : oil refining industry.
Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re-
fusal to accord union recognition until certified by Board; election necessary.
Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all production and maintenance
employees, excepting supervisory employees who have the right to hire and
discharge or to recommend hiring or discharging, and clerical employees ;
no controversy as to.
Mr. James H. Pipkin, of Houston, Tex., Mr. W. N. Sands, of Fort
Worth, Tex., and Mr. R. G. Collins, of Dallas, Tex., for the Company.
-Mr. Avril Inge, of Dallas, Tex., Mr. Joseph R. Kelahan, of Wash-
ington, D. C., and Mr. A. J. Reinhard, of Fort Worth, Tex., for the
Union.
Miss Melivern R. Krelow, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On June 18, 1941, International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local No. 472, herein called the Union, filed with the Acting Regional
Director for the Sixteenth Region (Fort Worth, Texas) a petition
alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the
representation of employees of The Texas Company, herein called the
Company, at its West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery, and
requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pur-
suant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat.
449, herein called the Act.
On August 4, 1941, the National Labor
Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section
9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series,2, as amended, ordered
an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it
and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice.
On August 13, 1941, the Regional Director issued a notice of bear-'.
ing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the Union,
35 N L. R B, No. 77.
373
374
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
International Association of Machinists, and International Brother-
hood of Electrical Workers.
Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held
on August 21, 1941, at Dallas, Texas, before Albert P. Wheatley, the
Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner.
The
Company and the Union were represented by counsel and participated
in the hearing.
Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-
examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues
was afforded all parties.
During the course of the hearing, the Trial
Examiner made several rulings on motions and on objections to the
admission of evidence.
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the
Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed.
The rulings are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Texas Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal
offices in New York City and Houston, Texas. It is the principal sub-
sidiary, wholly owned, of The Texas Corporation through which it
is affiliated with some 50 other corporations located in the State of
Texas, other States of the United States, and in foreign countries, all
constituting a world-wide organization for the production, transporta-
tion, refining, and marketing of crude oil and the products thereof,
and for incidental businesses.
This proceeding is concerned only with the employees engaged at
the West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery of the Company,
which has a capacity for handling approximately 14,000 barrels of
crude oil daily.
The crude oil moves to this refinery from producing
wells situated in the State of Texas through pipe lines operating as
a common Carrier.
The main finished products of this refinery are
gasoline, kerosene, fuel oil, and coke.
During the 6 months' period
ending June 30, 1941, approximately 1,444,542 barrels of gasoline
were manufactured and approximately 294,011 barrels were shipped;
approximately 151,301 barrels of kerosene were manufactured, and
approximately 15,130 barrels were shipped; approximately 76,732
barrels of fuel oil were manufactured, and none was shipped; and
approximately 133,127 barrels of coke were manufactured, and ap-
proximately 18,411 barrels were shipped.
The above shipments were
made to States other than the State of Texas. There are approxi-
mately 271 employees at the West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas,
refinery of the Company.
THE TEXAS COMPANY
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
375
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 472, is a
labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor,
admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On or about June 18, 1941, the Union asked the Company to enter
into collective bargaining negotiations affecting the employees of its
West Dallas Works, but such request was refused by the Company
until such time as the Union, or some other labor organization, should
be certified by the Board as the authorized collective bargaining
agency.
A report prepared by a Field Examiner of the Board concerning
claims of authorization for the purposes of representation which was
introduced into evidence at the hearing, shows that the Union repre-
sents a substantial number of employees of the Company at the West
Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery of the Company within
the unit the Union,alleges to be appropriate.'
We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation
of employees of the Company.
IV.
THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON
COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen, ocurring in connection with the operations of the Company
described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial
relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and
tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce
and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Union contends that the appropriate unit consists of all pro-
duction and maintenance employees, excepting supervisory employees
who have the right to hire and discharge or to recommend hiring or
discharging, and clerical employees.
The Company takes no position
concerning the unit.
Upon the. entire record we find that all production and maintenance
employees engaged in the West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas,
1 The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 133 authorization cards bearing
the apparently genuine signatures of persons, who appeared on the Company 's pay roll
as of July 3, 1941 .
There are approximately 200 employees within the unit which the
Union claims to be appropriate.
376
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
refinery of the Company, excepting 1supervisory-employees who have
the right to hire and discharge or to recommend hiring or discharg-
ing, and clerical employees, constitute a unit appropriate- for the
.purposes of collective bargaining and that such unit will insure to
employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-
organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate
the policies of the Act.
VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot.
We shall
direct that those eligible to vote in the election shall be those em-
ployees within the appropriate unit who were employed -by the
Company at its West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery,
during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of our
Direction of Election herein, subject to such limitations and addi-
tions as are set forth in said Direction.
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire
record in the case, the Board makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of The Texas Company at its West Dallas
Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery, within the meaning of Section
9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
2. All production and maintenance employees of The Texas Com-
pany at its West Dallas Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery, except-
ing supervisory employees who have the right to hire and discharge
or to recommend hiring or discharging, and clerical employees, con-
stitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as a part of the investigation authorized by the Board
to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining
with The Texas Company at its West Dallas Works, West Dallas,
Texas, refinery, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early
as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this
THE TEXAS COMPANY
377
Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Direc-
tor for the Sixteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the
National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9.
of said Rules and Regulations, among all production and maintenance
-employees who were employed by the Company at its West Dallas
Works, West Dallas, Texas, refinery during the pay-roll period im-
mediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees
who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill
or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the
United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory em-
ployees who have the right to hire and discharge or to recommend
hiring or discharging, and clerical employees, and those employees
who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether
or not they desire to be represented for the purposes of collective bar-
gaining by International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 472.