037 NLRB 469
Marshall Field & Co.
In the- Matter of
MARSHALL
FIELD & COMPANY
and
LOCAL 291,
UNITED RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND DEPARTMENT STORE EMPLOYEES OF
AMERICA (C. I. 0.)
Case B4798
AMENDMENT TO DECISION
AND
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 10, 1941-
On October 4, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein
called the Board, issued its Decision and Direction of Election in the
above-entitled proceedings.'
Pursuant to the Direction of Election,
an election by secret ballot was conducted on October 31, 1941, under
the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thir-
teenth Region
(Chicago, Illinois).
On November 1, 1941, the Re-
gional Director, acting pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National
Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended,
issued and duly served upon the parties an Election Report.
As to the balloting and its results, the Regional Director reported
as follows :
Total on eligibility list------------------------------------- 173
Total ballots cast-------------------------------------------
168
Total ballots challenged-------------------------------------
21
Total blank ballots--------------- ------------------------
1
Total void ballots---__
------------------------------------------
2
Total valid ballots cast-------------------------------------- 144
Ballots cast for the A F. of L union (International Brother-
hood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of
America, Local 743) --------------------------------------
9
Ballots cast for the C I 0 union (Local 291, United Retail,
Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America)-- 120
Ballots cast for neither--------------------------------------
15
On or about November 8, 1941, Marshall Field & Company, herein
called the Company, filed with the Regional Director and with 'the
Board objections to the recommendation of the Regional Director
that Local 291, United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Ein-
ployees of America, herein called'Local'291, be certified as the exclu-
'35N L R B, No 214
37 N L. R. B., No. 77.
4€9
433257-42-voL 37-31
470
DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
sive representative in the unit found appropriate in the Decision and
Direction of Election referred to above, and a motion that the Board
clarify the scope of the appropriate unit, together with a memorandum
and an affidavit in support thereof.
On November 18, 1941, Local
291- filed an answer to the objections and motion of the Company.
On "November 25, 1941, the Regional Director issued and duly served
on the parties his Report on Objections to Election Report.
In our Decision and Direction of Election of October 4, 1941, we
found that the appropriate unit consisted of "the employees in the
four warehouses of the Company in Chicago, Illinois, exclusive of
supervisory employees (other, than working foremen who do not
have the power-to hire and discharge).and clerical employees (other
than receiving clerks)," and directed that such employees, subject to
qualifications not here material, "whose names appear on the Com-
pany's pay roll immediately preceding the date of this Direction of
Election" should be eligible to vote.
The Company asserts that the
foregoing description of the appropriate unit is indefinite and, in
consequence, collective bargaining negotiations will be burdened by
uncertainty as to what employees are in, the unit.
The Company has
moved that the Board define in more detail the scope of the unit by
amending the Decision to describe the appropriate unit as follows :
All employees regularly employed in the four warehouses of the
Company in Chicago, Illinois, whose names appear on the ware-
house division of the company pay roll, exclusive of supervisory
employees (other than working foremen spending in excess of
twenty percent of their work week performing manual labor and
who do not have the power to hire and discharge) and clerical
employees (other than receiving clerks).
Local 291 agrees that the description of the unit may be amended as
proposed by the Company, except with respect to the suggested quali-
fication on the inclusion or exclusion of working foremen depending
upon whether they spend more or less than 20 percent of their work
week performing manual labor.2
In support of its proposals, the Company points to the fact that 21
employees were challenged 3 at the election, a circumstance which the
Company attributes to the alleged indefinite description of the unit
and the consequent uncertainty as to eligibility to vote.
Eight of the challenged voters are part of the so-called "operating
general force," which is a large group of employees who do not work
2 Although requested to do so by the Regional Director, International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 743, herein called the
Teamsters, did not submit any statement with respect to its position
3In his Report on Objections to Election Report, the Regional Director stated that the
challenges to the ballots of each of these 21 employees should be sustained.
MARSHALL FIELD
&
COMPANY
471
regularly in any one location in the Chicago retail division but may
be used in any part of the retail store or in the warehouses.
They
are not carried on the warehouse division pay roll , but were working
in the warehouses at the time of the election .
All of them were
challenged by the Company ; Local 291' challenged 6, but in its answer
to the Company 's objections states that employees not on the ware-
house-division pay roll should be excluded .
Eleven of the chal-
lenged voters are regular employees , 6 classed as "opening and
marking" and 5 as "merchandise stockroom ," listed on the retail-
store division pay roll who , because of lack of space in the retail store
during the Christmas season, were temporarily transferred to'the
warehouses subsequent to the hearing .
They perform the same work,
in,the temporary location .
Both the Company and Local 291, chal-
lenged these employees and agree that they should be excluded from
the unit.
The Company further proposes that in addition to the .exclusion
of supervisory employees, the unit be defined to exclude working
foremen who spend less than 20 percent of their work week per-
forming manual labor and who do not have the power to hire and
discharge , in lieu of the present description which includes working
foremen who do not have the power to hire and discharge. Local
291 opposes this proposal , asserting that it would confuse the issues
and lead to controversy as to the percentage of time spent by certain
working foremen in the performance of manual labor.
It appears
that two supervisory employees , J. Zahnen and E. Wuensche, voted
in the election and were challenged by the - Company, Local 291, and
the Teamsters.
Zahnen is the only supervisory employee at the
Fourteenth Street warehouse ; it does not appear whether he does any
manual work .
Wuensche is in full charge of the crating and ship-
ping department, at the Merchandise Mart; he does very little work
similar to that done by the employees he supervises .
Both of them
have power to recommend hiring and discharging , but neither has
authority to hire or discharge , as that power resides in the heads of
the personnel department.
It was not the intent of the Board nor of the parties to include
within the warehouse unit employees not regularly assigned to the
warehouses who were not carried on the warehouse-division pay roll
and who were performing retail -store division work but were tem-
porarily located in the warehouses .
However, the present description
of the unit, by merely referring to employees "in the four ware-
houses," is subject to the literal interpretation that such employees are
in the unit.
We shall amend the Decision to describe correctly the
unit in order to remove any ambiguity as to these groups of em-
ployees.
Although we find that Zahnen and Wuensche are super-
472
DECISIONS
OF NATIONAL
LABOR - RELATIONS BOARD
visory employees and not within the unit, we do not believe that the
record warrants adopting the limitation regarding working foremen
proposed by the Company.
We therefore deny the Company's mo-
tion in this respect.
The Board hereby amends the Decision issued October 4, 1941, by
striking from the last paragraph of Section V and from paragraph 2
of the Conclusions of Law the following words "employees in the
four warehouses" and substituting therefor the words "employees
regularly employed in the four warehouses." 4
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National, Labor
Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections
8 and 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-
Series 2, as amended,
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that Local 291, United Retail, Wholesale and
Department Store Employees of America, affiliated with the Con-
gress of Industrial Organizations, has been designated and selected
by a majority of the employees regularly employed in the four ware-
houses of Marshall Field & Company, Chicago, Illinois, exclusive of
supervisory employees (other than working foremen who do not have
the power to hire and discharge) and clerical employees (other than
receiving clerks), as their representative for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining, and that, pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the Act, Local
291, United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of
America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is
the exclusive representative of all such employees for the purposes of
collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of em-
ployment, and other conditions of employment.
4 It is unnecessary to add the further qualification suggested by the Company , namely,
\
that the names of such employees should appear upon the warehouse -division pay roll,
inasmuch as such limitation is applicable only in defining eligibility to vote and since it
appears that none of the employees regularly employed in the warehouses is not carried on
the warehouse -division pay roll.