FTC Docket C-3932
000331dukeenergyanalysis
In the Matter of Duke Energy Corporation, et al.
Analysis to Aid Public Comment on the Provisionally Accepted Consent Order
The Federal Trade Commission ("Commission") has accepted for public comment from
Duke Energy Corporation ("Duke"), Phillips Petroleum Company ("Phillips"), and Duke
Energy Field Services L.L.C. ("DEFS") an agreement containing Consent Order
designed to remedy the anticompetitive effects resulting from: (1) Duke and Phillips'
proposed merger of all of their natural gas gathering and processing businesses into
DEFS; and (2) Duke's proposed acquisition of certain gas gathering and processing
assets in central Oklahoma currently jointly owned by Conoco Inc. ("Conoco") and
Mitchell Energy & Development Corporation ("Mitchell"). The Consent Order requires
Duke to divest approximately 2780 miles of gas gathering pipeline in Kansas,
Oklahoma, and Texas.
This agreement has been placed on the public record for thirty (30) days for the receipt
of comments from interested persons. Comments received during this period will
become part of the public record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again
review the agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's Order.
On December 16, 1999, Duke and Phillips signed a letter agreement to transfer their
natural gas gathering and processing businesses to DEFS. Duke will be the majority
owner of DEFS. The value of this transaction is approximately $6 billion. On December
21, 1999, Duke agreed to acquire Conoco and Mitchell's jointly held central Oklahoma
gas gathering and processing assets. Gas gathering is the pipeline transportation of
natural gas from a wellhead or central delivery point to a gas transmission pipeline or
gas processing plant. The Commission found that the merger and acquisition may create
competitive problems in counties in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. The Commission's
complaint alleges that Duke, Phillips, and DEFS' merger agreement and Duke's
acquisition agreement with Conoco and Mitchell violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and the merger and acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18.
Seven relevant markets were identified where gas producers could only turn to the
parties or, at most, to one other gas gatherer, for gas gathering services. In these areas,
the proposed merger and acquisition would reduce competition in the provision of gas
gathering services and would likely lead to anticompetitive increases in gathering rates
and an overall reduction in gas drilling and production. It is unlikely that the
competition eliminated by the proposed merger and acquisition would be replaced by
new entry into the gas gathering market in these areas.
The proposed Consent Order requires Duke to divest pipeline systems in these markets
areas, eliminating any overlap between Duke's current holdings and what it will acquire
from Phillips and the Conoco/Mitchell joint venture. The gas gathering assets to be
divested are listed in Schedules A-J, with maps depicting the assets listed in Schedules
C-J. Of the 2,780 miles to be divested under this Consent Order, 2,250 miles will be
divested to Duke's joint venture partners for these assets. On February 28, 2000, Duke
divested its interest in the Schedule A assets, 800 miles of pipe in the Westana area of
Oklahoma, to Western, co-owner of the Westana Gathering Company. Duke has agreed
to divest its interest in the Schedule B assets, 1,450 miles of pipe in the Austin Chalk
area of Texas, to Mitchell, co-owner of Ferguson-Burleson County Gas Gathering
System. The remaining 530 miles will be sold to Commission-approved buyers. The
purposes of the divestitures are to ensure the continued use of the assets as gas
gathering assets and to remedy the lessening of competition resulting from the
In the Matter of Duke Energy Corporation, et al.
acquisition.
Duke must divest the assets within 120 days of final acceptance of the Consent Order
by the Commission. The Consent Order provides that if Duke fails to sell the 530 miles
of pipe that currently does not have an identified buyer, it must offer additional assets
for sale ("crown jewels"). If Duke fails to divest these assets, or if the sale to Mitchell is
not completed, by the deadline, the Commission may appoint a trustee to sell the assets.
Duke has entered into an Asset Maintenance Agreement, in which it has agreed to
maintain the assets that are being divested (as well as the "crown jewel" assets) in their
current condition and provide gas gathering services on the same terms and conditions
available to customers on March 1, 2000, until the assets are sold.
The purpose of this analysis is to invite public comment concerning the consent order.
This analysis is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and
order or to modify their terms in any way.