USSG App. B, Pt. III (§1B1.12)

Deleted departure provisions of §1B1.12. Persons Sentenced Under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (Policy Statement)

DeletedYear: 2025Length: 360 wordsOfficial source

Cite as U.S.S.G. App. B, Pt. III (§1B1.12)

Former §1B1.12 (Upward departures applicable to juvenile delinquents): The sentencing guidelines do not apply to a defendant sentenced under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 5031–5042). However, the sentence imposed upon a juvenile delinquent may not exceed the maximum of the guideline range applicable to an otherwise similarly situated adult defendant unless the court finds an aggravating factor sufficient to warrant an upward departure from that guideline range. United States v. R.L.C., 503 U.S. 291 (1992). Therefore, a necessary step in ascertaining the maximum sentence that may be imposed upon a juvenile delinquent is the determination of the guideline range that would be applicable to a similarly situated adult defendant. CHAPTER TWO OFFENSE CONDUCT PART A ― OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON 1. Homicide First Degree Murder Former §2A1.1, comment. (n.2) (Departure based on premediated killing and felony murder): (A) Offenses Involving Premeditated Killing.—In the case of premeditated killing, life imprisonment is the appropriate sentence if a sentence of death is not imposed. A downward departure would not be appropriate in such a case. A downward departure from a mandatory statutory term of life imprisonment is permissible only in cases in which the government files a motion for a downward departure for the defendant’s substantial assistance, as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e). (B) Felony Murder.—If the defendant did not cause the death intentionally or knowingly, a downward departure may be warranted. For example, a downward departure may be warranted if in robbing a bank, the defendant merely passed a note to the teller, as a result of which the teller had a heart attack and died. The extent of the departure should be based upon the defendant’s state of mind (e.g., recklessness or negligence), the degree of risk inherent in the conduct, and the nature of the underlying offense conduct. However, departure below the minimum guideline sentence provided for second degree murder in §2A1.2 (Second Degree Murder) is not likely to be appropriate. Also, because death obviously is an aggravating factor, it necessarily would be inappropriate to impose a sentence at a level below that which the guideline for the underlying offense requires in the absence of death.
USSG App. B, Pt. III (§1B1.12): Deleted departure provisions of §1B1.12. Persons Sentenced Under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (Policy Statement) | Justis AI