42 C.F.R. § 476.96

Review period and reopening of initial denial determinations and changes as a result of DRG validations.

Last amended: 2017Year: 2026Length: 284 wordsSubsections: 4Official source

Cite as 42 C.F.R. § 476.96 (2026)

(a) General timeframe. A QIO or its subcontractor— (1) Within one year of the date of the claim containing the service in question, may review and deny payment; and (2) Within one year of the date of its decision, may reopen an initial denial determination or a change as a result of a DRG validation. (b) Extended timeframes. (1) An initial denial determination or change as a result of a DRG validation may be made after one year but within four years of the date of the claim containing the service in question, if CMS approves. (2) A reopening of an initial denial determination or change as a result of a DRG validation may be made after one year but within four years of the date of the QIO's decision if— (i) Additional information is received on the patient's condition; (ii) Reviewer error occurred in interpretation or application of Medicare coverage policy or review criteria; (iii) There is an error apparent on the face of the evidence upon which the initial denial or DRG validation was based; or (iv) There is a clerical error in the statement of the initial denial determination or change as a result of a DRG validation. (c) Fraud and abuse. (1) A QIO or its subcontractor may review and deny payment anytime there is a finding that the claim for service involves fraud or a similar abusive practice that does not support a finding of fraud. (2) An initial denial determination or change as a result of a DRG validation may be reopened and revised anytime there is a finding that it was obtained through fraud or a similar abusive practice that does not support a finding of fraud.
42 C.F.R. § 476.96: Review period and reopening of initial denial determinations and changes as a result of DRG validations. | Justis AI