23 C.F.R. § 636.302

Are there any limitations on the selection and use of proposal evaluation factors?

Last amended: 2017Year: 2026Length: 401 wordsSubsections: 4Official source

Cite as 23 C.F.R. § 636.302 (2026)

(a) The selection of the evaluation factors, significant subfactors and their relative importance are within your broad discretion subject to the following requirements: (1) You must evaluate price in every source selection where construction is a significant component of the scope of work. However, where the contracting agency elects to release the final RFP and award the design-build contract before the conclusion of the NEPA process (see § 636.109), then the following requirements apply: (i) It is not necessary to evaluate the total contract price; (ii) Price must be considered to the extent the contract requires the contracting agency to make any payments to the design-builder for any work performed prior to the completion of the NEPA process and the contracting agency wishes to use Federal-aid highway funds for those activities; (iii) The evaluation of proposals and award of the contract may be based on qualitative considerations; (iv) If the contracting agency wishes to use Federal-aid highway funds for final design and construction, the subsequent approval of final design and construction activities will be contingent upon a finding of price reasonableness by the contracting agency; (v) The determination of price reasonableness for any design-build project funded with Federal-aid highway funds shall be based on at least one of the following methods: (A) Compliance with the applicable procurement requirements for part 172, 635, or 636, where the contractor providing the final design or construction services, or both, is a person or entity other than the design-builder; (B) A negotiated price determined on an open-book basis by both the design-builder and contracting agency; or (C) An independent estimate by the contracting agency based on the price of similar work; (vi) The contracting agency's finding of price reasonableness is subject to FHWA concurrence. (2) You must evaluate the quality of the product or service through consideration of one or more non-price evaluation factors. These factors may include (but are not limited to) such criteria as: (i) Compliance with solicitation requirements; (ii) Completion schedule (contractual incentives and disincentives for early completion may be used where appropriate); or (iii) Technical solutions. (3) At your discretion, you may evaluate past performance, technical experience and management experience (subject to § 636.303(b)). (b) All factors and significant subfactors that will affect contract award and their relative importance must be stated clearly in the solicitation. [67 FR 75926, Dec. 10, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 45338, Aug. 14, 2007]
Cross-references to the CFR
636.109636.303
23 C.F.R. § 636.302: Are there any limitations on the selection and use of proposal evaluation factors? | Justis AI