33-9710

Donald J. Anthony, et al. (Order Granting Second Motion for Extension)

Last amended: 2015Year: 2015Length: 576 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Securities Act Release No. 33-9710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 9710 / January 26, 2015 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 74139 / January 26, 2015 INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4007 / January 26, 2015 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 Release No. 31429 / January 26, 2015 Admin. Proc. File No. 3-15514 In the Matter of DONALD J. ANTHONY, JR., FRANK H. CHIAPPOINE, RICHARD D. FELDMANN, WILLIAM P. GAMELLO, ANDREW G. GUZZETTI, WILLIAM F. LEX, THOMAS E. LIVINGSTON, BRIAN T. MAYER, PHILIP S. RABINOVICH, and RYAN C. ROGERS ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION Chief Administrative Law Judge Brenda P. Murray has moved, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 360(a)(3),1 for an extension of thirty additional days to issue the initial decision in this proceeding.2 As discussed below, we grant her motion. 1 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(3). 2 We previously granted an extension request in this proceeding. Donald J. Anthony, Jr., Exchange Act Release No. 72788 (Aug. 7, 2014). 2 On September 23, 2013, we issued an Order Instituting Proceedings ("OIP") against ten persons associated with McGinn, Smith & Co., Inc. ("MS & Co." or the "Firm"), a former registered broker-dealer and investment adviser.3 The OIP alleges, among other things, that nine of MS & Co.'s top-selling brokers ignored numerous red flags in selling millions of dollars of securities in private placement offerings created and controlled by the Firm's founders in violation of registration provisions.4 It further alleges related violations of antifraud provisions5 and supervisory failures.6 The OIP directed that an initial decision be issued within 300 days of the date of service of the OIP. On August 7, 2014, we granted the Chief Administrative Law Judge's first motion requesting an extension of time until January 26, 2015 to file the initial decision based in part on the length and complexity of the proceeding.7 On December 16, 2014, Chief Judge Murray requested a second extension based on timing conflicts with initial decision deadlines for other pending complex matters in the Office of Administrative Law Judges.8 We adopted Rules of Practice 360(a)(2) and 360(a)(3) to enhance the timely and efficient adjudication and disposition of Commission administrative proceedings by setting deadlines for issuance of initial decisions.9 The rules further provide for extensions under certain circumstances, if supported by a motion from the Chief Administrative Law Judge and we determine, as in this case, that "additional time is necessary or appropriate in the public interest."10 * * * 3 Donald J. Anthony, Jr., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70473, 2013 WL 5306694 (Sept. 23, 2013). 4 Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c). 5 Securities Act Section 17(a), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a); Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. 6 Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4), (b)(6), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78o(b)(4), 78o(b)(6). 7 See note 2, infra. 8 Chief Judge Murray supports her request by stating "[i]t will be impossible to meet these other deadlines, keep up with normal case assignments, and meet the January 26, 2015, Anthony deadline." 9 See Adopting Release, Exchange Act Release No. 48018, 2003 WL 21354791, at *2 (June 11, 2003). 10 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(3). 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for filing the initial decision in this proceeding is extended to February 25, 2015. By the Commission. Brent J. Fields Secretary
33-9710: Donald J. Anthony, et al. (Order Granting Second Motion for Extension) | Justis AI