Pub. L. 101-508, tit. V, subtit. B, sec. 5106
FEES FOR REPRESENTATION OF CLAIMANTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS.
SEC. 5106. FEES FOR REPRESENTATION OF CLAIMANTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS. (a) In General.— (1) Title n.—Subsection (a) of section 206 (42 U.S.C. 406(a)) is amended— (A) by inserting “(1)” after “(a)”; (B) in the fifth sentence, by striking “Whenever” and inserting “Except as provided in paragraph (2)(A), whenever”; and (C) by striking the sixth sentence and all that follows through “Any person who” in the seventh sentence and inserting the following: “(2)(A) In the case of a claim of entitlement to past-due benefits under this title, if— “(i) an agreement between the claimant and another person regarding any fee to be recovered by such person to compensate such person for services with respect to the claim is presented in 104 STAT. 1388–267writing to the Secretary prior to the time of the Secretary’s determination regarding the claim, “(ii) the fee specified in the agreement does not exceed the lesser of— “(I) 25 percent of the total amount of such past-due benefits (as determined before any applicable reduction under section 1127(a)), or “(II) $4,000, and “(iii) the determination is favorable to the claimant, then the Secretary shall approve that agreement at the time of the favorable determination, and (subject to paragraph (3)) the fee specified in the agreement shall be the maximum fee. The Secretary may from time to time increase the dollar amount under clause (ii)(II) to the extent that the rate of increase in such amount, as determined over the period since January 1, 1991, does not at any time exceed the rate of increase in primary insurance amounts under section 215(i) since such date. The Secretary shall publish any such increased amount in the Federal Register. “(B) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘past-due benefits’ excludes any benefits with respect to which payment has been continued pursuant to subsection (g) or (h) of section 223. “(C) In the case of a claim with respect to which the Secretary has approved an agreement pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide the claimant and the person representing the claimant a written notice of— “(i) the dollar amount of the past-due benefits (as determined before any applicable reduction under section 1127(a)) and the dollar amount of the past-due benefits payable to the claimant, “(ii) the dollar amount of the maximum fee which may be charged or recovered as determined under this paragraph, and “(iii) a description of the procedures for review under paragraph (3). “(3)(A) The Secretary shall provide by regulation for review of the amount which would otherwise be the maximum fee as determined under paragraph (2) if, within 15 days after receipt of the notice provided pursuant to paragraph (2)(0— “(i) the claimant, or the administrative law judge or other adjudicator who made the favorable determination, submits a written request to the Secretary to reduce the maximum fee, or “(ii) the person representing the claimant submits a written request to the Secretary to increase the maximum fee. Any such review shall be conducted after providing the claimant, the person representing the claimant, and the adjudicator with reasonable notice of such request and an opportunity to submit written information in favor of or in opposition to such request. The adjudicator may request the Secretary to reduce the maximum fee only on the basis of evidence of the failure of the person representing the claimant to represent adequately the claimant’s interest or on the basis of evidence that the fee is clearly excessive for services rendered. “(B) (i) In the case of a request for review under subparagraph (A) by the claimant or by the person representing the claimant, such review shall be conducted by the administrative law judge who made the favorable determination or, if the Secretary determines that such administrative law judge is unavailable or if the determination was not made by an administrative law judge, such review 104 STAT. 1388–268shall be conducted by another person designated by the Secretary for such purpose. “(ii) In the case of a request by the adjudicator for review under subparagraph (A), the review shall be conducted by the Secretary or by an administrative law judge or other person (other than such adjudicator) who is designated by the Secretary. “(C) Upon completion of the review, the administrative law judge or other person conducting the review shall affirm or modify the amount which would otherwise be the maximum fee. Any such amount so affirmed or modified shall be considered the amount of the maximum fee which may be recovered under paragraph (2). The decision of the administrative law judge or other person conducting the review shall not be subject to further review. “(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), if the claimant is determined to be entitled to past-due benefits under this title and the person representing the claimant is an attorney, the Secretary shall, notwithstanding section 205(i), certify for payment out of such past-due benefits (as determined before any applicable reduction under section 1127(a)) to such attorney an amount equal to so much of the maximum fee as does not exceed 25 percent of such past-due benefits (as determined before any applicable reduction under section 1127(a)). “(B) The Secretary shall not in any case certify any amount for payment to the attorney pursuant to this paragraph before the expiration of the 15-day period referred to in paragraph (3)(A) or, in the case of any review conducted under paragraph (3), before the completion of such review. “(5) Any person who”. (2) Title xvi.—Paragraph (2)(A) of section 1631(d) (42 U.S.C. 1383(d)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows: “(2)(A) The provisions of section 206(a) (other than paragraph (4) thereof) shall apply to this part to the same extent as they apply in the case of title II, except that paragraph (2) thereof shall be applied— “(i) by substituting ‘section 1127(a) or 1631(g)’ for ‘section 1127(a)’; and “(ii) by substituting ‘section 1631(a)(7)(A) or the requirements of due process of law’ for ‘subsection (g) or (h) of section 223’.”. (b) Protection of Attorney’s Fees From Offsetting SSI Benefits.—Subsection (a) of section 1127 (42 U.S.C. 1320a-6(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “A benefit under title II shall not be reduced pursuant to the preceding sentence to the extent that any amount of such benefit would not otherwise be available for payment in full of the maximum fee which may be recovered from such benefit by an attorney pursuant to section 206(a)(4).”. (c) Limitatation of Travel Expenses for Representation of Claimants at Administrative Proceedings.—Section 2010) (42 U.S.C. 4010)), section 1631(h) (42 U.S.C. 1383(h)), and section 1817(i) (42 U.S.C. 1395i(i)) are each amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The amount available for payment under this subsection for travel by a representative to attend an administrative proceeding before an administrative law judge or other adjudicator shall not exceed the maximum amount allowable under this subsection for such travel originating within the geographic area of the office having jurisdiction over such proceeding.”. 104 STAT. 1388–269 (d) Effective Date.—The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to determinations made on or after July 1, 1991, and to reimbursement for travel expenses incurred on or after April 1, 1991.