Pub. L. 86-645, tit. I, sec. 101

Sec. 101. That the following works of improvement of rivers and harbors and other waterways for navigation, flood control, and other purposes are hereby adopted and authorized to be prosecuted under the direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, in accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions recommended by the Chief of Engineers in the respective reports hereinafter designated: Provided, That the provisions of section 1 of the River and Harbor Act approved March 2, 1945 (Public Law Numbered 14, Seventy-ninth Congress, first session), shall govern with respect to projects authorized in this title; and the procedures therein set forth with respect to plans, proposals, or reports for works of improvement for navigation or flood control and for irrigation and purposes incidental thereto, shall apply as if herein set forth in full: navigation Eastport Harbor, Maine: Senate Document Numbered 98, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $595,000; Southwest Harbor, Maine: House Document Numbered 408, Eighty-fifth Congress, at an estimated cost of $240,000; Stonington Harbor, Maine: House Document Numbered 36, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $198,000; South Bristol Harbor, Maine: Senate Document Numbered 30, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $97,000; Wells Harbor, Maine: House Document Numbered 202, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $340,000; York Harbor, Maine: House Document Numbered 395, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $391,000; Pepperell Cove, Maine: House Document Numbered 284, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $170,000; Rye Harbor, New Hampshire: House Document Numbered 439, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $238,000; Cotuit Harbor, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 142, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $320,000; Apponaug Cove, Rhode Island: House Document Numbered 143, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $180,000; Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, Rhode Island and Connecticut: House Document Numbered 396, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $98,000; Moriches and Shinecock Inlets, New York: House Document Numbered 126, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $6,858,000; Mamaroneck Harbor (East Basin), New York: House Document Numbered 209, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $105,000; Wilmington Harbor, Delaware: Senate Document Numbered 88, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $351,000; Ocracoke Inlet, North Carolina: House Document Numbered 408, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,623,000;74 Stat. 481 Shem Creek, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina: House Document Numbered 35, Eighty-six Congress, maintenance; Everglades Harbor, Florida: House Document Numbered 147, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $117,200; Gulf Coast Shrimp Boat Harbors, Florida: House Document Numbered 183, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $373,000; Bakers Haulover Inlet, Florida: House Document Numbered 189, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $239,000; Palm Beach Harbor, Lake Worth Inlet, Florida: House Document Numbered 283, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,980,000; Miami Harbor, Florida: Senate Document Numbered 71, Eighty-fifth Congress, at an estimated cost of $3,818,000; Little Pass, Clearwater Bay, Florida: House Document Numbered 293, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $104,000; St. Marks River, Florida: House Document Numbered 224, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,711,000; Black Warrior, Warrior, and Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, at Jackson lock and dam: House Document Numbered 50, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $120,000; Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi: House Document Numbered 98, Eighty-sixth Congress, maintenance; Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi: The Secretary of the Army is hereby authorized and directed to cause an immediate study to be made under the direction of the Chief of Engineers of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (Public Law 790, Eighty-third Congress), House Document Numbered 98, Eighty-sixth Congress, to determine if further modification is warranted, and further modification of the project is hereby authorized as determined to be justified by the Secretary of the Army with the approval of the President, unless within the first period of 60 calendar days of continuous session of the Congress after the date on which the report is submitted to it such report is disapproved by Congress. Biloxi Harbor, Mississippi: House Document Numbered 271, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $326,000; Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche—Jump Waterway, Louisiana: House Document Numbered 112, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,664,000; Bayous Petit Anse, Tigre, and Carlin, Louisiana: Senate Document Numbered 70, Eighty-fifth Congress, at an estimated cost of $106,000; Freshwater Bayou, Louisiana: House Document Numbered 435, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $7,485,000; Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana: House Document Numbered 436, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $16,992,000; Texas City Channel, Texas: House Document Numbered 427, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,605,000; Brazos Island Harbor, Texas: House Document Numbered 428, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,381,000; Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana: Senate Document Numbered 112, Eighty-sixth Congress, in lieu of the navigation project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1950, Public Law 516, Eighty-first Congress, Senate Document Numbered 117, Eighty-first Congress, at an estimated cost of $43,550,000;74 Stat. 482 In addition to previous authorizations, there is hereby authorized the completion of the Barkley Dam project in Kentucky, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954, at an estimated additional cost of $146,000,000: Provided, That the Chief of Engineers is hereby authorized to relocate the Illinois Central Railroad, as required by the construction of said project, in such manner as to eliminate and prevent interference with and disturbance of municipal and private facilities in Lyon County, Kentucky, not otherwise affected by the construction of the project, substantially in accordance with alinement “D” shown on the plans on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers; Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota at Dubuque, Iowa: House Document, Numbered 56, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $38,000; Red Wing Harbor, Minnesota: House Document Numbered 32, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $170,400; Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 113, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $715,000; Milwaukee Harbor, Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 285, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $38,000; Kewaunee Harbor, Wisconsin: Senate Document Numbered 19, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $81,900; Two Harbors, Minnesota: House Document Numbered 146, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $162,000; Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 150, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,364,000; Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 196, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,513,000; Ashland Harbor, Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 165, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,495,000; Presque Isle Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 145, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $215,300; Marquette Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 154, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $236,000; Manistee Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 358, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,735,000.; Detroit River, Trenton Channel, Michigan: House Document Numbered 319, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $8,570,000; Calumet Harbor, Illinois and Indiana: House Document Numbered 149, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $5,240,000; Indiana Harbor, Indiana: House Document Numbered 195, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $974,000; Toledo Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 153, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $14,684,000; Sandusky Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 144, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $5,800,000; Cleveland Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 152, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,486,000; Lorain Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 166, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $19,323,000; Fairport Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 347, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,768,000; Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 148, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,077,000; Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania: House Document Numbered 199, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,729,000;74 Stat. 483 Buffalo Harbor, New York: House Document Numbered 151, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,352,000; Rochester Harbor, New York: House Document Numbered 409, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,445,000; Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors (West Basin), California: House Document Numbered 401, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,768,000: Monterey Harbor (Monterey Bay), California: House Document Numbered 219, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $3,989,000; Noyo River and Harbor, California: House Document Numbered 289. Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $370,000; Snohomish River (Everett Harbor), Washington: House Document Numbered 348, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $3,011,000; Kahului Harbor, Island of Maui, Hawaii: House Document Numbered 109, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $944,500; Hilo Harbor, Hawaii: The Secretary of the Army is hereby authorized and directed to cause an immediate study to be made under the direction of the Chief of Engineers of a sea-wall to protect against tidal waves and excessive high tides, and the project is hereby authorized as determined to be justified by the Secretary of the Army with the approval of the President, unless within the first period of 60 calendar days of continuous session of the Congress after the date on which the report is submitted to it such report is disapproved by Congress. beach erosion control Wessagussett Beach, Weymouth, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 334, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $132,000; Pemberton Point to Cape Cod Canal, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 272, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $139,300; Cape Cod Canal to Provincetown, Massachusetts: House Document Numbered 404, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $178,000; South Kingstown and Westerly, Rhode Island: House Document Numbered 30, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $140,300; Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York: House Document Numbered 425, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $19,400,000; New Jersey Coast from Barnegat Inlet to Cape May Canal, New Jersey: House Document Numbered 208, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,714,000; Key West, Florida: House Document Numbered 413, Eighty-fifth Congress, at an estimated cost of $231,200. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pennsylvania: House Document Numbered 397, Eighty-sixth Congress, periodic nourishment; Orange County, Newport Bay to San Mateo Creek, California: House Document Numbered 398, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $256,000.