Pub. L. 102-240, tit. III, sec. 3012

METROPOLITAN PLANNING.

EnactedYear: 1991Length: 3,613 wordsOfficial source
SEC. 3012. METROPOLITAN PLANNING. The Act is amended by striking section 8 and inserting the following new section: “SEC. 8. METROPOLITAN PLANNING. “(a) General Requirements.— It is in the national interest to encourage and promote the development of transportation systems embracing various modes of transportation in a manner which will efficiently maximize mobility of people and goods within and through urbanized areas and minimize transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. To accomplish this objective, metropolitan planning organizations, in cooperation with the State, shall develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State. Such plans and programs shall provide for the development of transportation facilities (including pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) which will function as an intermodal transportation system for the State, the metropolitan areas, and the Nation. The process for developing such plans and programs shall provide for consideration of all modes of transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of the transportation problems. “(b) Designation of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.— “(1) In general.— To carry out the transportation planning process required by this section, a metropolitan planning organization shall be designated for each urbanized area of more than 50,000 population by agreement among the Governor and units of general purpose local government which together represent at least 75 percent of the affected population (including the central city or cities as defined by the Bureau of the Census) or in accordance with procedures established by applicable State or local law. “(2) Membership of certain mpo’s.— In a metropolitan area designated as a transportation management area, the metropolitan planning organization designated for such area shall include local elected officials, officials of agencies which administer or operate major modes of transportation in the metropolitan area (including all transportation agencies included in the metropolitan planning organization on June 1, 1991) and appropriate State officials. This paragraph shall only apply to a metropolitan planning organization which is redesignated after the date of the enactment of this section. “(3) Limitation on statutory construction.— Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to interfere with the authority, under any State law in effect on the date of the enactment 105 STAT. 2099of this section, of a public agency with multimodal transportation responsibilities to— “(A) develop plans and programs for adoption by a metropolitan planning organization; and “(B) develop long-range capital plans, coordinate transit services and projects, and carry out other activities pursuant to State law. “(4) Continuing designation.— Designations of metropolitan planning organizations, whether made under this section or other provisions of law, shall remain in effect until redesignated under paragraph (5) or revoked by agreement among the Governor and units of general purpose local government which together represent at least 75 percent of the affected population or as otherwise provided under State or local procedures. “(5) Redesignation.— “(A) Procedures.— A metropolitan planning organization may be redesignated by agreement among the Governor and units of general purpose local government which together represent at least 75 percent of the affected population (including the central city or cities as defined by the Bureau of the Census) as appropriate to carry out this section. “(B) Certain requests to redesignate.— A metropolitan planning organization shall be redesignated upon request of a unit or units of general purpose local government representing at least 25 percent of the affected population (including the central city or cities as defined by the Bureau of the Census) in any urbanized area (i) whose population is more than 5,000,000 but less than 10,000,000, or (ii) which is an extreme nonattainment area for ozone or carbon monoxide as defined under the Clean Air Act. Such redesignation shall be accomplished using procedures established by subparagraph (A). “(6) Treatment of large urban areas.— More than 1 metropolitan planning organization may be designated within an urbanized area as defined by the Bureau of the Census only if the Governor determines that the size and complexity of the urbanized area make designation of more than 1 metropolitan planning organization for such area appropriate. “(c) Metropolitan Area Boundaries.— For the purposes of this section, the boundaries of a metropolitan area shall be determined by agreement between the metropolitan planning organization and the Governor. Each metropolitan area shall cover at least the existing urbanized area and the contiguous area expected to become urbanized within the 20-year forecast period and may encompass the entire Metropolitan Statistical Area or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area, as defined by the Bureau of the Census. For areas designated as nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act, the boundaries of the metropolitan area shall at least include the boundaries of the nonattainment area, except as otherwise provided by agreement between the metropolitan planning organization and the Governor. “(d) Coordination in Multi-State Areas.— “(1) In general.— The Secretary shall establish such requirements as the Secretary considers appropriate to encourage Governors and metropolitan planning organizations with responsibility for a portion of a multi-State metropolitan area to 105 STAT. 2100provide coordinated transportation planning for the entire metropolitan area. “(2) Compacts.— The consent of Congress is hereby given to any 2 or more States to enter into agreements or compacts, not in conflict with any law of the United States, for cooperative efforts and mutual assistance in support of activities authorized under this section as such activities pertain to interstate areas and localities within such States and to establish such agencies, joint or otherwise, as such States may deem desirable for making such agreements and compacts effective. “(e) Coordination of MPO’s.— If more than 1 metropolitan planning organization has authority within a metropolitan area or an area which is designated as a nonattainment area for ozone or carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act, each metropolitan planning organization shall consult with the other metropolitan planning organizations designated for such area and the State in the coordination of plans and programs required by this section. “(f) Factors To Be Considered.— In developing transportation plans and programs pursuant to this section, each metropolitan planning organization shall, at a minimum, consider the following: “(1) Preservation of existing transportation facilities and, where practical, ways to meet transportation needs by using existing transportation facilities more efficiently. “(2) The consistency of transportation planning with applicable Federal, State, and local energy conservation programs, goals, and objectives. “(3) The need to relieve congestion and prevent congestion from occurring where it does not yet occur. “(4) The likely effect of transportation policy decisions on land use and development and the consistency of transportation plans and programs with the provisions of all applicable short- and long-term land use and development plans. “(5) The programming of expenditure on transportation enhancement activities as required in section 133. “(6) The effects of all transportation projects to be undertaken within the metropolitan area, without regard to whether such projects are publicly funded. “(7) International border crossings and access to ports, airports, intermodal transportation facilities, major freight distribution routes, national parks, recreation areas, monuments and historic sites, and military installations. “(8) The need for connectivity of roads within the metropolitan area with roads outside the metropolitan area. “(9) The transportation needs identified through use of the management systems required by section 303 of this title. “(10) Preservation of rights-of-way for construction of future transportation projects, including identification of unused rights-of-way which may be needed for future transportation corridors and identification of those corridors for which action is most needed to prevent destruction or loss. “(11) Methods to enhance the efficient movement of freight. “(12) The use of life-cycle costs in the design and engineering of bridges, tunnels, or pavement. “(13) The overall social, economic, energy, and environmental effects of transportation decisions. “(14) Methods to expand and enhance transit services and to increase the use of such services. 105 STAT. 2101 “(15) Capital investments that would result in increased security in transit systems. “(g) Development of Long Range Plan.— “(1) In general.— Each metropolitan planning organization shall prepare, and update periodically, according to a schedule that the Secretary determines to be appropriate, a long range plan for its metropolitan area in accordance with the requirements of this subsection. “(2) Long range plan.— A long range plan under this section shall be in a form that the Secretary determines to be appropriate and shall, at a minimum: “(A) Identify transportation facilities (including but not necessarily limited to major roadways, transit, and multimodal and intermodal facilities) that should function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system, giving emphasis to those facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions. In formulating the long range plan, the metropolitan planning organization shall consider factors described in subsection (f) as such factors relate to a 20-year forecast period. “(B) Include a financial plan that demonstrates how the long-range plan can be implemented, indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the plan, and recommends any innovative financing techniques to finance needed projects and programs, including such techniques as value capture, tolls and congestion pricing. “(C) Assess capital investment and other measures necessary to— “(i) ensure the preservation of the existing metropolitan transportation system, including requirements for operational improvements, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of existing and future major roadways, as well as operations, maintenance, modernization, and rehabilitation of existing and future transit facilities; and “(ii) make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the mobility of people and goods. “(D) Indicate as appropriate proposed transportation enhancement activities. “(3) Coordination with clean air act agencies.— In metropolitan areas which are in nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act, the metropolitan planning organization shall coordinate the development of a long range plan with the process for development of the transportation control measures of the State Implementation Plan required by the Clean Air Act. “(4) Participation by interested parties.— Before approving a long range plan, each metropolitan planning organization shall provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the long range plan, in a manner that the Secretary deems appropriate. 105 STAT. 2102 “(5) Publication of long range plan.— Each long range plan prepared by a metropolitan planning organization shall be— “(i) published or otherwise made readily available for public review; and “(ii) submitted for information purposes to the Governor at such times and in such manner as the Secretary shall establish. “(h) Transportation Improvement Program.— “(1) Development.— The metropolitan planning organization designated for a metropolitan area, in cooperation with the State and affected transit operators, shall develop a transportation improvement program for the area for which such organization is designated. In developing the program, the metropolitan planning organization shall provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, other affected employee representatives, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed program. The program shall be updated at least once every 2 years and shall be approved by the metropolitan planning organization and the Governor. “(2) Priority of projects.— The transportation improvement program shall include the following: “(A) A priority list of projects and project segments to be carried out within each 3-year period after the initial adoption of the transportation improvement program. “(B) A financial plan that demonstrates how the transportation improvement program can be implemented, indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the plan, and recommends any innovative financing techniques to finance needed projects and programs, including value capture, tolls, and congestion pricing. “(3) Selection of projects.— Except as otherwise provided in subsection (i)(4), project selection in metropolitan areas for projects involving Federal participation shall be carried out by the State in cooperation with the metropolitan planning organization and shall be in conformance with the transportation improvement program for the area. “(4) Major capital investments.— Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to conform review requirements for transit projects under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to comparable requirements under such Act applicable to highway projects. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the applicability of such Act to transit or highway projects. “(5) Included projects.— A transportation improvement program for a metropolitan area developed under this subsection shall include projects within the area which are proposed for funding under this title and the Federal Transit Act and which are consistent with the long range plan developed under subsection (g) for the area. The program shall include a project, or an identified phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of the project. 105 STAT. 2103 “(6) Notice and comment.— Before approving a transportation improvement program, a metropolitan planning organization shall provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with reasonable notice of and an opportunity to comment on the proposed program. “(i) Transportation Management Areas.— “(1) Designation.— The Secretary shall designate as transportation management areas all urbanized areas over 200,000 population. The Secretary shall designate any additional area as a transportation management area upon the request of the Governor and the metropolitan planning organization designated for such area or the affected local officials. Such additional areas shall include upon such a request the Lake Tahoe Basin as defined by Public Law 96–551. “(2) Transportation plans and programs.— Within a transportation management area, transportation plans and programs shall be based on a continuing and comprehensive transportation planning process carried out by the metropolitan planning organization in cooperation with the State and transit operators. “(3) Congestion management system.— Within a transportation management area, the transportation planning process under this section shall include a congestion management system that provides for effective management of new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under this title and the Federal Transit Act through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management strategies. The Secretary shall establish an appropriate phase-in schedule for compliance with the requirements of this section. “(4) Selection of projects.— All projects carried out within the boundaries of a transportation management area with Federal participation pursuant to this title (excluding projects undertaken on the National Highway System and pursuant to the Bridge and Interstate Maintenance programs) or pursuant to the Federal Transit Act shall be selected by the metropolitan planning organization designated for such area in consultation with the State and in conformance with the transportation improvement program for such area and priorities established therein. Projects undertaken within the boundaries of a transportation management area on the National Highway System or pursuant to the Bridge and Interstate Maintenance programs shall be selected by the State in cooperation with the metropolitan planning organization designated for such area and shall be in conformance with the transportation improvement program for such area. “(5) Certification.— The Secretary shall assure that each metropolitan planning organization in each transportation management area is carrying out its responsibilities under applicable provisions of Federal law, and shall so certify at least once every 3 years. The Secretary may make such certification only if (1) a metropolitan planning organization is complying with the requirements of section 134 and other applicable requirements of Federal law, and (2) there is a transportation improvement program for the area that has been approved by the metropolitan planning organization and the Governor. If 105 STAT. 2104after September 30, 1993, a metropolitan planning organization is not certified by the Secretary, the Secretary may withhold, in whole or in part, the apportionment under section 104(b)(3) attributed to the relevant metropolitan area pursuant to section 133(d)(3) and capital funds apportioned under the formula program under section 9 of the Federal Transit Act. If a metropolitan planning organization remains uncertified for more than 2 consecutive years after September 30, 1994, 20 percent of the apportionment attributed to that metropolitan area under section 133(d)(3) and capital funds apportioned under the formula program under section 9 of the Federal Transit Act shall be withheld. The withheld apportionments shall be restored to the metropolitan area at such time as the metropolitan planning organization is certified by the Secretary. The Secretary shall not withhold certification under this section based upon the policies and criteria established by a metropolitan planning organization or transit grant recipient for determining the feasibility of private enterprise participation in accordance with section 8(o) of the Federal Transit Act. “(j) Abbreviated Plans and Programs for Certain Areas.— For metropolitan areas not designated as transportation management areas under this section, the Secretary may provide for the development of abbreviated metropolitan transportation plans and programs that the Secretary determines to be appropriate to achieve the purposes of this section, taking into account the complexity of transportation problems, including transportation related air qualify problems, in such areas. In no event shall the Secretary provide abbreviated plans or programs for metropolitan areas which are in nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide under the Clean Air Act. “(k) Transfer of Funds.— Funds made available for a transit project under title 23, United States Code, shall be transferred to and administered by the Secretary in accordance with the requirements of this Act. Funds made available for a highway project under this Act shall be transferred to and administered by the Secretary in accordance with the requirements of title 23, United States Code. “(l) Additional Requirements for Certain Nonattainment Areas.— Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act or title 23, United States Code, for transportation management areas classified as nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide pursuant to the Clean Air Act, Federal funds may not be programmed in such area for any transit project that will result in a significant increase in carrying capacity for single occupant vehicles unless the project is part of an approved congestion management system. “(m) Limitation on Statutory Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed— “(1) to confer on a metropolitan planning organization the authority to impose legal requirements on any transportation facility, provider, or project not eligible under this title or the Federal Transit Act; or “(2) to intervene in the management of a transportation agency. “(n) Grants.— “(1) Eligibility.— The Secretary is authorized to contract for and make grants to States and local public bodies and agencies thereof, or enter into agreements with other Federal departments and agencies, for the planning, engineering, design, and 105 STAT. 2105evaluation of public transportation projects, and for other technical studies. Activities assisted under this section may include— “(A) studies relating to management, operations, capital requirements, and economic feasibility; “(B) evaluation of previously funded projects; and “(C) other similar or related activities preliminary to and in preparation for the construction, acquisition, or improved operation of facilities and equipment. “(2) Criteria.— A grant, contract, or working agreement under this section shall be made in accordance with criteria established by the Secretary. “(o) Private Enterprise.— The plans and programs required by this section shall encourage to the maximum extent feasible the participation of private enterprise. Where facilities and equipment are to be acquired which are already being used in service in the urban areas, the program must provide that they shall be so improved (through modernization, extension, addition, or otherwise) that they will better serve the transportation needs of the area. “(p) Use for Comprehensive Planning.— “(1) In general.— The Secretary shall ensure, to the extent practicable, that amounts made available under section 21(c)(1) for the purposes of this section are used to support balanced and comprehensive transportation planning that takes into account the relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without regard to the programmatic source of the planning funds. “(2) Formula allocation to all metropolitan areas.— The Secretary shall apportion 80 percent of the amount made available under section 21(c)(1) to States in the ratio that the population in urbanized areas, in each State, bears to the total population in urbanized areas, in all the States as shown by the latest available decennial census, except that no State shall receive less than % of 1 percent of the amount apportioned under this paragraph. Such funds shall be allocated to metropolitan planning organizations designated under section 8 by a formula, developed by the State in cooperation with metropolitan planning organizations and approved by the Secretary, that considers population in urbanized areas and provides an appropriate distribution for urbanized areas to carry out the cooperative processes described in section 8 of this Act. The State shall make such funds available promptly to eligible metropolitan planning organizations according to procedures approved by the Secretary. “(3) Supplemental allocation.— The Secretary shall apportion 20 percent of the amounts made available under section 21(c)(1) to States to supplement allocations under subparagraph (B) for metropolitan planning organizations. Such funds shall be allocated according to a formula that reflects the additional costs of carrying out planning, programming, and project selection responsibilities under this section in such areas. “(4) Hold harmless.— The Secretary shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that no metropolitan planning organization is allocated less than the amount it received by administrative formula under section 8 in fiscal year 1991. To comply with the previous sentence, the Secretary is authorized 105 STAT. 2106to make a pro rata reduction in other amounts made available to carry out section 21(c). “(5) Federal share payable.— The Federal share payable for activities under this paragraph shall be 80 percent except where the Secretary determines that it is in the Federal interest not to require a State or local match.”.
Pub. L. 102-240, tit. III, sec. 3012: METROPOLITAN PLANNING. | Justis AI