Pub. L. 102-375, tit. II, sec. 211

STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAMS.

EnactedYear: 1992Length: 383 wordsOfficial source
SEC. 211. STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAMS. Not later than January 1, 1994, the Commissioner on Aging shall, in consultation with State agencies, State Long-Term Care Ombudsmen, the National Ombudsman Resource Center established under section 202(a)(21) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (as added by section 202(b)(2) of this Act), and professional ombudsmen associations, directly, or by grant or contract, conduct a study, and submit a report to the committees specified in section 207(b)(2) of such Act, analyzing separately with respect to each State— (1) the availability of services, and the unmet need for services, under the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman pro-106 STAT. 1216grams in effect under sections 307(a)(12) and 712 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) to residents of long-term care facilities (as defined in section 102 of such Act); (2) the effectiveness of the programs in providing the services to the residents, including residents of board and care facilities (as defined in section 102 of such Act) and of similar adult care facilities; (3) the adequacy of Federal and other resources available to carry out the programs on a statewide basis in each State; (4) compliance and barriers to such compliance of the States in carrying out the programs; (5) any actual and potential conflicts of interest in the administration and operation of the programs; and (6) the need for and feasibility of providing ombudsman services to older individuals (as defined in section 102 of such Act) who are not in long-term care facilities and who use long-term care services and other health care services, by analyzing and assessing current State agency practices in programs in which the State Long-Term Care Ombudsmen provide services to older individuals in settings in addition to long-term care facilities, taking into account variations in— (A) settings where services are provided; (B) the types of clients served; (C) the types of complaints and problems handled; (D) State regulation of long-term care provided in settings other than long-term care facilities; and (E) possible conflicts of interest between the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman programs under such Act and area agencies on aging (as defined in section 102 of such Act) who provide to older individuals long-term care services both in such settings and in long-term care facilities.
Pub. L. 102-375, tit. II, sec. 211: STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAMS. | Justis AI