PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. Except as provided in this section, the following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this section: (1) Southeast alaska harbors of refuge, alaska.— The project for navigation, Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $15,013,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,763,000. (2) Whiteman’s creek, Arkansas.— The project for flood control, Whiteman’s Creek, Arkansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $4,978,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,838,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. (3) Morro bay harbor, California.— The project for navigation, Morro Bay Harbor, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 4, 1992, at a total cost of $2,056,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $1,644,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $412,000. (4) Sacramento metro area, California.— The project for flood control, Sacramento Metro Area, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost 106 STAT. 4802of $17,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,200,000. (5) Rio grande alamosa, Colorado.— The project for flood control, Rio Grande Alamosa, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated October 7, 1991, at a total cost of $7,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,830,000. (6) Delaware river mainstem and channel deepening, delaware, new jersey, and pennsylvania.— The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and Channel Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $294,931,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $195,767,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $99,164,000. (7) Canaveral harbor, Florida.— The project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 24, 1991, as modified by the letter of the Secretary dated October 10, 1991, at a total cost of $11,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,680,000. (8) Kissimmee river restoration, Florida.— The project for the ecosystem restoration of the Kissimmee River, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated March 17, 1992, at a total cost of $426,885,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $139,943,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $286,942,000. The Secretary is further authorized to construct the Kissimmee River headwaters revitalization project in accordance with the report prepared under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4251–4252) for such headwaters project and any modifications as are recommended by the Secretary based on the benefits derived for the environmental restoration of the Kissimmee River basin, at a total cost of $92,210,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,105,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $46,105,000. The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to ensure that implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. (9) Port everglades harbor, Florida.— The project for navigation, Port Everglades Harbor, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated September 23, 1991, at an annual cost of $94,500. (10) Savannah harbor, Georgia and south Carolina.— The project for navigation, Savannah Harbor, Georgia and South Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of $47,416,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,112,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $32,304,000. The Secretary is authorized to increase the Federal cost share of the recommended plan in accordance with the cost-sharing provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662) if the Secretary determines that such an increase is warranted and appropriate. (11) Amite river and tributaries, Louisiana.— The project for flood control, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated August 27, 1991, as modified by the letter of the Secretary, dated January 28, 106 STAT. 48031992, at a total cost of $65,902,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,951,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $32,951,000. (12) Saugus river and tributaries, Massachusetts.— The project for flood control, Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated August 1, 1990, at a total cost of $95,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $61,360,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $34,340,000. (13) Las vegas wash and tributaries, Nevada.— The project for flood control, Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries, Nevada: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $204,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $144,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $60,300,000. The Secretary is further authorized to construct recreation features as proposed in the draft Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement for Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries (Flamingo and Tropicana Washes), dated July 1990, at a total cost of $10,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,000,000. (14) Morehead city harbor, north Carolina.— The project for navigation, Morehead City Harbor, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 21, 1991, at a total cost of $10,030,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,360,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,670,000. (15) West onslow and new river inlet, north Carolina.— The project for flood control, West Onslow and New River Inlet, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated November 19, 1991, at a total cost of $14,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,500,000. (16) Lackawanna river at olyphant, Pennsylvania.— The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at Olyphant, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $11,354,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,691,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,663,000. (17) Lackawanna river at scranton, Pennsylvania.— The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $15,117,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,344,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,773,000. (18) Locks and dams 2, 3, and 4, Monongahela river, Pennsylvania.— The project for navigation, Locks and Dams 2, 3, and 4, Monongahela River, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of $556,400,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be paid 1/2 from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 1/2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (19) Rio grande de loiza, Puerto rico.— The project for flood control, Rio Grande De Loiza, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated March 5, 1992, at a total cost of $122,285,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $97,009,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,276,000. 106 STAT. 4804 (20) Sargent beach, Texas.— The project for navigation, Sargent Beach, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 25, 1992, at a total cost of $67,667,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be paid 1/2 from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and ¥2 from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (21) Shoal creek, Austin, Texas.— The project for flood control, Shoal Creek, Austin, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 16, 1992, at a total cost of $6,808,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,106,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,702,000. (22) Sandbridge beach, Virginia beach, Virginia.— The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $8,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,750,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,100,000.