SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): (1) South upland, san bernadino county, california.—Project for flood control, South Upland, San Bernadino County, California. (2) Birds, lawrence county, illinois.—Project for flood control, Birds, Lawrence County, Illinois. (3) Bridgeport, lawrence county, illinois.—Project for flood control, Bridgeport, Lawrence County, Illinois. (4) Embarras river, villa grove, illinois.—Project for flood control, Embarras River, Villa Grove, Illinois. (5) Frankfort, will county, illinois.—Project for flood control, Frankfort, Will County, Illinois. (6) Sumner, lawrence county, illinois.—Project for flood control, Sumner, Lawrence County, Illinois. (7) Vermillion river, demonade park, lafayette, louisiana.—Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion River, Demonade Park, Lafayette, Louisiana. In carrying out the study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant information from the Lafayette Parish feasibility study and expedite completion of the study under this paragraph. (8) Vermillion river, quail hollow subdivision, lafayette, louisiana.—Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion River, Quail Hollow Subdivision, Lafayette, Louisiana. In carrying out the study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant information from the Lafayette Parish feasibility study and expedite completion of the study under this paragraph. (9) Kawkawlin river, bay county, michigan.—Project for flood control, Kawkawlin River, Bay County, Michigan. (10) Whitney drain, arenac county, michigan.—Project for flood control, Whitney Drain, Arenac County, Michigan. (11) Festus and crystal city, missouri.—Project for flood control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. In carrying out the study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant information from the existing reconnaissance study and shall expedite completion of the study under this paragraph. (12) Kimmswick, missouri.—Project for flood control, Kimmswick, Missouri. In carrying out the study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant information from the existing reconnaissance study and shall expedite completion of the study under this paragraph. (13) River des peres, st. louis county, missouri.—Project for flood control, River Des Peres, St. Louis County, Missouri. In carrying out the study and the project (if any),110 STAT. 3669 the Secretary shall determine the feasibility of potential flood control measures, consider potential storm water runoff and related improvements, and cooperate with the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. (14) Malta, montana.—Project for flood control, Malta, Montana. (15) Buffalo creek, erie county, new york.—Project for flood control, Buffalo Creek, Erie County, New York. (16) Cazenovia creek, erie county, new york.—Project for flood control, Cazenovia Creek, Erie County, New York. (17) Cheektowaga, erie county, new york.—Project for flood control, Cheektowaga, Erie County, New York. (18) Fulmer creek, village of mohawk, new york.—Project for flood control, Fulmer Creek, village of Mohawk, New York. (19) Moyer creek, village of frankfort, new york.—Project for flood control, Moyer Creek, village of Frankfort, New York. (20) Sauquoit creek, Whitesboro, new york.—Project for flood control, Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, New York. (21) Steele creek, village of ilion, new york.—Project for flood control, Steele Creek, village of Ilion, New York. (22) Willamette river, oregon.—Project for non-structural flood control, Willamette River, Oregon, including floodplain and ecosystem restoration.