PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. (a) Projects With Chief’s Reports.—The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this subsection: (1) Barnegat inlet to little egg inlet, new jersey.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 26, 2000, at a total cost of $51,203,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,282,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,921,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $1,751,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,138,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $613,000. (2) Port of new york and new jersey, new york and new jersey.— (A) In general.—The project for navigation, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 2, 2000, at a total cost of $1,781,234,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $743,954,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,037,280,000. (B) Non-federal share.— (i) In general.—The non-Federal share of the costs of the project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind services or materials. (ii) Credit.—The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of execution of a cooperation agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (b) Projects Subject to Final Report.—The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the Chief is completed not later than December 31,2000: (1) False pass harbor, alaska.—The project for navigation, False Pass Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $15,552,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,374,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,178,000. (2) Unalaska harbor, alaska.—The project for navigation, Unalaska Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000, except that the date for completion of the favorable report of the Chief of Engineers shall be December 31, 2001, instead of December 31, 2000. (3) Rio de flag, flagstaff, arizona.—The project for flood damage reduction, Rio de Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona, at a total 114 STAT. 2577cost of $24,072,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,576,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,496,000. (4) Tres rios, arizona.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona, at a total cost of $99,320,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $62,755,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $36,565,000. (5) Los angeles harbor, california.—The project for navigation, Los Angeles Harbor, California, at a total cost of $153,313,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $43,735,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $109,578,000. (6) Murrieta creek, california.—The project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Murrieta Creek, California, described as alternative 6, based on the District Engineer’s Murrieta Creek feasibility report and environmental impact statement dated October 2000, at a total cost of $89,846,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,556,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $64,290,000. (7) Pine flat dam, california.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Pine Flat Dam, California, at a total cost of $34,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $22,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $12,000,000. (8) Santa barbara streams, lower mission creek, california.—The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara streams, Lower Mission Creek, California, at a total cost of $18,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,100,000. (9) Upper newport bay, california.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Upper Newport Bay, California, at a total cost of $32,475,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $21,109,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,366,000. (10) Whitewater river basin, california.—The project for flood damage reduction, Whitewater River basin, California, at a total cost of $28,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,100,000. (11) Delaware coast from cape henlopen to fenwick island.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Coast from Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, at a total cost of $5,633,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,661,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,972,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $920,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $460,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $460,000. (12) Port sutton, florida.—The project for navigation, Port Sutton, Florida, at a total cost of $7,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,700,000. (13) Barbers point harbor, hawaii.—The project for navigation, Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii, at a total cost of $30,003,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,524,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,479,000. (14) John myers lock and dam, indiana and kentucky.—The project for navigation, John Myers Lock and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky, at a total cost of $181,700,000. The costs of 114 STAT. 2578construction of the project shall be paid ½ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and ½ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (15) Greenup lock and dam, kentucky and ohio.—The project for navigation, Greenup Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Ohio, at a total cost of $175,500,000. The costs of construction of the project shall be paid ½ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and ½ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. (16) Ohio river, kentucky, illinois, indiana, ohio, pennsylvania, and west virginia.— (A) In general.—Projects for ecosystem restoration, Ohio River Mainstem, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, at a total cost of $307,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $200,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $107,700,000. (B) Non-federal share.— (i) In general.—The non-Federal share of the costs of any project under this paragraph may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind services or materials. (ii) Credit.—The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under this paragraph the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of execution of a cooperation agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (17) Morganza, louisiana, to gulf of mexico.— (A) In general.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Morganza, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico, at a total cost of $550,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $358,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $192,000,000. (B) Credit.—The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for interim flood protection after March 31, 1989, if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (18) Monarch-chesterfield, missouri.—The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri, at a total cost of $58,090,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $37,758,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $20,331,500. (19) Antelope creek, lincoln, nebraska.—The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska, at a total cost of $46,310,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $23,155,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,155,000. (20) Sand creek watershed, wahoo, nebraska.—The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, at a total cost of $29,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,870,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $12,970,000. (21) Western sarpy and clear creek, nebraska.—The project for flood damage reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear 114 STAT. 2579Creek, Nebraska, at a total cost of $15,643,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,518,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,125,000. (22) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, cliffwood beach, new jersey.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, at a total cost of $5,219,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,392,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,827,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $110,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $55,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $55,000. (23) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, port monmouth, new jersey.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Port Monmouth, New Jersey, at a total cost of $32,064,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,842,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,222,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $173,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $86,500 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $86,500. (24) Dare county beaches, north carolina.—The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Dare County beaches, North Carolina, at a total cost of $71,674,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,588,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,086,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $34,990,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $17,495,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $17,495,000. (25) Wolf river, memphis, tennessee.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Wolf River, Memphis, Tennessee, at a total cost of $9,118,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,849,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,269,000. (26) Duwamish/green, washington.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, at a total cost of $112,860,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,360,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $39,500,000. (27) Stillagumaish river basin, washington.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Stillagumaish River basin, Washington, at a total cost of $23,590,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,680,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,910,000. (28) Jackson hole, wyoming.— (A) In general.—The project for ecosystem restoration, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, at a total cost of $52,242,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,957,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $18,285,000. (B) Non-federal share.— (i) In general.—The non-Federal share of the costs of the project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind services or materials. (ii) Credit.—The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of execution of 114 STAT. 2580a cooperation agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.