SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. (a) In General.—The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s): (1) Haleyville, alabama.—Project for flood damage reduction, Haleyville, Alabama. (2) Weiss lake, alabama.—Project for flood damage reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama. (3) Fort yukon, alaska.—Project for flood damage reduction, Fort Yukon, Alaska. (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.—Project for flood damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona. (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.—Project for flood damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas. (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, California. (7) Borrego springs, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Borrego Springs, California. (8) Colton, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Colton, California. (9) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California. (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California. (11) Ontario and chino, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California. (12) Santa venetia, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California. (13) Whittier, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California. (14) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.—Project for flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California. (15) Bibb county and city of macon levee, georgia.—Project for flood damage reduction, Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, Georgia. (16) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.—Project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana. (17) St. francisville, lousiana.—Project for flood damage reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana. (18) Salem, massachusetts.—Project for flood damage reduction, Salem, Massachusetts. (19) Cass river, michigan.—Project for flood damage reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan. (20) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.—Project for flood damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota. (21) Marsh creek, minnesota.—Project for flood damage reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota. (22) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.—Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota. (23) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.—Project for flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri. (24) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.—Project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey. (25) Canisteo river, addison, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, New York. (26) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York. (27) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New York. (28) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, New York City, New York. (29) East valley creek, andover, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York. (30) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.—Project for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, New York. (31) Little yankee and mud run, trumbull county, ohio.—Project for flood damage reduction, Little Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull County, Ohio. (32) Little neshaminy creek, warrington, pennsylvania.—Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, Pennsylvania. (33) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, pennsylvania.—Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania. (34) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.—Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, Pennsylvania. (35) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, pennsylvania.—Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania. (36) Surfside beach, south carolina.—Project for flood damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina. (37) Sandy creek, jackson county, tennessee.—A project for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee. (38) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.—Project for flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas. (39) Dilley, texas.—Project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas. (40) Cheyenne, wyoming.—Project for flood damage reduction, Cheyenne, Wyoming. (b) Special Rules.— (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.—The Secretary may proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that the project is located within the boundaries of the flood control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41). (2) Ontario and chino, california.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (3) Santa venetia, california.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California, referred to in subsection (a)(12) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible and shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (4) Whittier, california.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, referred to in subsection (a)(13) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.—The Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the project for flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in subsection (a)(14) and, if the Secretary determines that the plan meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. (6) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.—In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, referred to in subsection (a)(16) the Secretary shall— (A) provide a 100-year level of flood protection at the Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman sites along the St. Mary's River; and (B) allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (7) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.—In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(22) the Secretary may consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the project and shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the project. (8) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection (a)(24) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible. (9) Sandy creek, tennessee.—Consistent with the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, on the West Tennessee Tributaries project, in carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Tennessee, referred to in section (a)(37)— (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an authorized channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries project; and (B) the project shall not be considered to be part of the West Tennessee Tributaries project. (10) Dilley, texas.—The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to in subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.