ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

SEC. 352. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS. (a) Consistency With Reports.—Congress finds that the project modifications described in this section are in accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled “Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development”, or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. (b) Modifications.— (1) Sacramento area, california.—Section 219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840) is amended to read as follows: “(23) Sacramento area, california.—$45,000,000 for regional water conservation, recycling, reliability, and resiliency projects in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, California.” . (2) South perris, california.—Section 219(f)(52) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking “ $25,000,000” and inserting “ $50,000,000”. (3) Madison and st. clair counties, illinois.—Section 219(f)(55) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by striking “ $10,000,000” and inserting “ $45,000,000”. (4) Southern and eastern kentucky.—Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1226) is amended— (A) in subsection (g), by inserting “Boyd, Carter, Elliott, Lincoln,” after “Lee,”; and (B) in subsection (h), by striking “ $40,000,000” and inserting “ $100,000,000”. (5) Desoto county, mississippi.—Section 219(f)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 119 Stat. 282; 119 Stat. 2257; 122 Stat. 1623) is amended by striking “ $75,000,000” and inserting “ $130,000,000”. (6) Jackson county, mississippi.—Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 1494; 121 Stat. 1258) is amended— (A) in subsection (c)(5), by striking “water supply and” and inserting “water supply, projects for stormwater and drainage systems, and”; and (B) in subsection (e)(1), by striking “ $32,500,000” and inserting “ $57,500,000”. (7) St. louis, missouri.—Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 337; 121 Stat. 1233) is amended by striking “ $35,000,000” and inserting “ $70,000,000”. (8) Midwest city, oklahoma.—Section 219(f)(231) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1266) is amended by striking “ $2,000,000” and inserting “ $5,000,000”. (9) South central pennsylvania.—Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121 Stat. 1146) is amended— (A) in subsection (g)(1), by striking “ $200,000,000” and inserting “ $400,000,000”; and (B) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting “Beaver, Jefferson,” after “Washington,”. (10) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.—Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat. 3818) is amended by striking “ $89,550,000” and inserting “ $110,000,000”. (11) El paso county, texas.—Section 219(f)(269) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1268) is amended by striking “ $25,000,000” and inserting “ $75,000,000”. (12) Western rural water.—Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat. 1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681) is amended— (A) by striking the section heading and inserting “western rural water.”; (B) in subsection (b), by inserting “Arizona,” before “rural Idaho”; (C) in subsection (c), by inserting “Arizona,” before “Idaho”; and (D) in subsection (i), by striking “for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000, to remain available until expended.” and inserting the following:“, to remain available until expended— “(1) for the period beginning with fiscal year 2001, $435,000,000 for Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and Wyoming; and “(2) $150,000,000 for Arizona.” . (13) Central west virginia.—Section 571(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 371; 121 Stat. 1257) is amended by striking “ $20,000,000” and inserting “ $100,000,000”. (14) Southern west virginia.—Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 110 Stat. 3727; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by striking “ $40,000,000” and inserting “ $120,000,000”. (c) Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.—Section 5032(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114, 121 Stat. 1205) is amended by striking “15” and inserting “20”. (d) Cape Arundel Disposal Site, Maine.—Section 1312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3821) is amended by striking “December 31, 2021” and inserting “September 30, 2024”.