HAR §18-235-1.10
HAR §18-235-1.10. Aliens
Cite as Haw. Code R. § 18-235-1.10
(a) “Alien” means an individual who is not a United States citizen.
(b)
An alien is a resident of Hawaii if the alien has permanent resident alien status (green card) and
is domiciled in Hawaii, or resides in Hawaii for other than a temporary or transitory purpose. Thus, like all other
individuals, the status of an alien as a resident or nonresident for Hawaii income tax purposes is determined by all of
the factual circumstances.
(c)
Hawaii has not adopted the federal provisions of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 7701(b)(with
respect to the definition of resident alien and nonresident alien), and therefore, section 7701(b) does not control for
Hawaii income tax purposes. In addition, tax treaties between the United States and foreign countries do not apply to
sub-nation states’ taxing authority and therefore do not control for Hawaii income tax purposes.
(d)
In certain situations, a taxpayer may be considered a nonresident alien for federal income tax
purposes and a resident for Hawaii income tax purposes. In these situations, the special rules applicable to individuals
who are considered nonresident aliens for federal income tax purposes will apply when the individual files a Hawaii
resident income tax return.
Example 1: N, a Hawaii resident, married O, a citizen of Australia, while both were
attending college in Hawaii. Upon their graduation from college, they both found employment in
Hawaii. After their marriage, O filed the required documents and became a permanent resident
alien.
Conclusion: O is deemed to be a resident of Hawaii. O is domiciled in Hawaii and became a
permanent resident alien upon her marriage to N.
Example 2: P is a Japanese national who is domiciled in Japan. In 1995, P moved to Hawaii
to manage a Japanese company’s U.S. business operations. P was admitted by the United States
Immigration and Naturalization Service as a nonimmigrant alien. P’s authorized stay can be
extended periodically. During 1995, P was physically present in Hawaii for more than 200 days
during the taxable year.
Conclusion: P is deemed to be a resident of Hawaii. Although P is in Hawaii as a
nonimmigrant alien, and is domiciled in Japan, P is in Hawaii for other than a temporary or
transitory purpose.
HRS §235-1
§18-235-1.11
INCOME TAX LAW
235- 12 (Unofficial Compilation as of 12/31/2025)
Example 3: Q accepted a tenure track position at the University of Hawaii, and arrived to
begin employment on August 1, 1996. Although Q entered the United States on a nonimmigrant
alien visa, Q intends to remain in the United States as a permanent resident alien and pursue tenure
at the University of Hawaii.
Conclusion: Although Q was not in Hawaii for more than 200 days in 1996, Q is in Hawaii
for other than a temporary or transitory purpose. Therefore, Q should file as a part-year resident
for tax year 1996 even though the 200 day test of the presumption of residency is not met.
Example 4: Mr. and Mrs. R and their son are citizens of Brazil and are in Hawaii on J visas.
Mr. R is a teacher and does not meet the substantial presence test under IRC section 7701(b)(3)
and is, therefore, a nonresident alien for federal income tax purposes. Mr. R files a federal Form
1040-NR on which his filing status is required to be married filing a separate return. IRC section
6013(a)(1) does not allow the filing of a joint return if either spouse was a nonresident alien at any
time during the taxable year. Mrs. R also works part-time in Hawaii. Mr. and Mrs. R and their son
were in Hawaii for more than 200 days in 1996 and will be filing as Hawaii residents. Can Mr. and
Mrs. R file a joint Hawaii resident tax return?
Conclusion: Section 235-93, HRS, provides that a husband and wife, having that status for
purposes of the IRC and entitled to make a joint federal return for the taxable year, may make
a single return jointly of taxes under this chapter for the taxable year. Hawaii has adopted the
provisions of IRC section 6013(a)(1) through section 18-235- 93(a)(2), HAR. IRC section 6013(a)
(1) provides that no joint return shall be made if either the husband or the wife at any time during
the taxable year is a nonresident alien. Accordingly, Mr. and Mrs. R cannot file a joint Hawaii tax
return. Mr. and Mrs. R must each file separate Hawaii resident tax returns.
Example 5: The facts are the same as stated in Example 4. Can Mr. R claim his son as his
dependent on his Hawaii resident tax return?
Conclusion: Section 235-54, HRS, provides that the number of personal exemptions an
individual may claim is in part determined by ascertaining the number of personal exemptions
that the individual may lawfully claim under IRC section 151. IRC section 873(b)(3), limits a
nonresident alien individual to claim, under IRC section 151, a single deduction for personal
exemption unless the taxpayer is a resident of a contiguous country or a national of the United
States. IRC section 152(b)(3) further states that the term “dependent,” for purposes of determining
personal exemptions under IRC section 151, does not include any individual who is not a citizen
or national of the United States unless such individual is a resident of the United States or country
contiguous to the United States. For federal income tax purposes, Mr. R cannot claim his son as a
dependent since his son is not a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, resident alien or resident of a country
contiguous to the United States. Accordingly, Mr. R cannot claim his son as a dependent on his
Hawaii resident tax return.
Example 6: The facts are the same as stated in Example 4. Can Mr. R claim the standard
deduction on his Hawaii resident tax return.
Conclusion: IRC section 63(c)(6), which Hawaii adopts through section 235-2.4(a), HRS,
provides that a nonresident alien individual cannot claim the standard deduction. Accordingly, Mr.
R cannot claim the standard deduction on his Hawaii resident tax return. Mr. R must itemize any
allowable deductions.
Example 7: Mr. and Mrs. S are in Hawaii on H visas. Mr. S is a college professor. Mr. S
meets the federal substantial presence test but files a federal Form 1040-NR to claim the treaty
benefits which exclude his wages as a professor from federal taxation for two years. Mr. and Mrs.
S were in Hawaii for more than 200 days in 1996 and will be filing as Hawaii residents. Will the
treaty also exclude Mr. S’s wages from Hawaii taxation?
Conclusion: The provisions of income tax treaties are between the United States and
the foreign country. Income tax treaties are designed to protect taxpayers from double and
discriminating taxation by either treaty country, and normally do not preempt state tax laws.
Accordingly, the treaty has no effect on Hawaii income tax law and Mr. S’s wages as a professor
are subject to Hawaii income tax. [Eff 2/16/82; am 9/3/94; am and ren §18-235-1.10 8/28/98]
(Auth: HRS §§231-3(9), 235-118) (Imp: HRS §235-2.4, 235-54, 235-93)