HAR §18-238-4. relating to producers

(f) Application of the rules contained in subsections (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section may be illustrated by the following examples. Example 1: “A” purchases and imports a container load of merchandise from an out-of-state seller for resale in Hawaii to “X”, a retail discount store. “A’s” records further disclose that other imports and purchases made by “A” are sold to various other retail stores. Thus, because all sales are at the wholesale level, all such imports and purchases from an out-of-state seller are exempt from the use tax. Example 2: “B”, who is in the business of manufacturing food items, imports food preservatives and food containers. The preservatives are to be incorporated into the manufactured product while the containers are used to make the finished product marketable. “B” has an agreement to sell all of his manufactured products exclusively to “S”, a large retail supermarket with many branches. Because all sales are at the wholesale level, “B” is exempt from the use tax. “B”, however, will be taxed on the activity of a manufacturer as provided under the general excise tax law. Example 3: “C” is engaged in a scientific contract with the United States. To complete this construction project, certain scientific equipment and supplies which are to become an integral part of the project are imported because they are not available in Hawaii. On the basis of the fact that the imported properties are to become an integral part of the project, no use tax shall be levied or collected on the equipment and supplies imported by “C”. Example 4: Assume the same facts in Example 3 except that “C” is engaged in an operation and maintenance scientific contract with the United States and imports supplies which are to be entirely consumed during the performance of the service contract. On the basis of the fact that the imported supplies are to be entirely consumed in the performance of the contract, no use tax shall be levied or collected on the supplies imported by “C”. Example 5: If “A” and “B” in Examples 1 and 2 were also engaged in selling their merchandise and products at the retail level, use tax at the rate of one-half of one per cent would apply on the imports and purchases (for resale at retail) plus four per cent general excise tax on their subsequent sale at the retail level. If “C” in Example 3 is involved in other construction projects which do not meet the provisions of section 237-26, HRS, “C” would be subject to the use tax at the rate of one-half of USE TAX LAW § 18-238-2 238- 3 (Unofficial Compilation as of 12/31/2025) one per cent on the landed value of the tangible personal property imported and incorporated into such nonscientific projects. If “C” in Example 4 is involved in other operation and maintenance contracts which do not meet the provisions of section 237-26, HRS, “C” would be subject to the use tax at the rate of four per cent on the landed value of the supplies imported for use in such nonscientific contracts. Example 6: Service business. A tire recapper, “D”, who recaps tires belonging to other persons is subject to the use tax at the rate of four per cent in respect of tangible personal property (that is consumed in performance of a service) which: (1) “D” imports and incorporates into such tires; or (2) is transferred to “D” by another person who is not taxable under the general excise tax law in respect of such transfer and which is incorporated into such tires. Example 7: Manufacturer. A tire recapper, “E”, who recaps tires for “E’s” own stock for resale is not subject to the use tax in respect of tangible personal property which: (1) “E” imports or acquires and incorporates into such tires; or (2) is transferred to “E” by another person who is not taxable under the general excise tax law in respect of such transfer and which is incorporated into such tires. (g) Basis of Property. (1) Purchase price or landed value. Except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of section 238-2, HRS, and these rules, the basis of property shall be the purchase price of the tangible personal property if the purchase and sale are consummated in Hawaii or landed value of the tangible personal property if the purchase and sale are consummated outside of Hawaii or if there is no purchase price applicable thereto. (2) Deduction for trade-in; depreciation, etc. The time of accrual of the tax in the case of an automobile imported into the State for use shall be at the time the automobile comes to rest in the State and ceases its character as an article in interstate commerce. The landed value for purposes of the use tax basis shall be the landed cost in the State. Such landed cost shall consist of invoice price plus freight, insurance, custom duty, and any other charges incident to landing the motor vehicle in the State, less: (1) trade-in allowance for old car; (2) any charges for license plates outside Hawaii; and (3) a depreciation allowance of ten per cent for normal use outside Hawaii, but this rate may be adjusted depending upon the mileage and condition of the car. The landed value of the motor vehicle shall not include any retail sales tax paid to another state or local government. (A) When the motor vehicle has been used prior to bringing it into the State, the landed value for purposes of the use tax basis may be reduced by applying a depreciation allowance for normal use of the motor vehicle outside of the State. The depreciation allowed depends on the mileage and condition of the motor vehicle. No depreciation is allowed for a motor vehicle brought in to the State within 90 days of its date of purchase. The 90 day period shall not include any shipping time or any time during which a motor vehicle was placed in storage prior to its import into the State. (B) For purposes of depreciation, the calculation of the landed value of a motor vehicle used prior to its importation into the State also may include the cost of any repairs or replacement parts added to the motor vehicle to maintain or increase its value during the taxpayer’s use of the motor vehicle prior to shipping the motor vehicle into the State. The department of taxation may require an explanation and supporting information for any depreciation reduction of the landed value of a motor vehicle. Taxpayers who believe a depreciation allowance is warranted may use the depreciation schedule printed on the back of the Use Tax Return (Form G-26). (C) Section 238-3(h), HRS, allows a credit against the Hawaii use tax for the combined amount of sales or use taxes imposed by and paid to another state (or any subdivision thereof) on tangible personal property before it is imported into the State. Accordingly, a taxpayer may receive a credit up to the amount of Hawaii use tax due (4 percent of the landed value of the motor vehicle) for any sales or use taxes paid by the taxpayer to another state upon the purchase or use of the motor vehicle. The calculation of the credit shall not include any other taxes paid to other states, such as taxes on manufacturing, license fees, or transfer taxes. The amount of credit also shall not exceed the amount of use tax imposed by the State of Hawaii on such tangible personal property. To substantiate the claim for the credit allowance, the § 18-238-2 USE TAX LAW 238- 4 (Unofficial Compilation as of 12/31/2025) department of taxation may require copies of receipts or vouchers indicating the payment of the sales or use taxes to another state. (3) Temporary use. Temporary use of property shall not include any property located in or in use within the State for a period exceeding 365 days. (4) Labor charges. Labor charges for the repair or reconditioning of tangible personal property shall be included in the purchase price or landed value of the tangible personal property for purposes of determining the use tax basis. (5) Although the sales transaction may be based outside of Hawaii, which is merely a method or means of determining who is to pay the freight from that particular point, primary consideration should be given to the place of delivery of the tangible personal property. Whether the general excise tax or the use tax would be applicable depends upon where the place of delivery of the tangible personal property is located and whether the seller has nexus. (6) Application of the rules contained in paragraphs (1) and (5) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1: A contract is executed in Hawaii by a local consumer and a dealer doing business in Hawaii with the place of delivery in San Francisco and the purchaser arranging for the shipment of the merchandise into Hawaii directly with a common carrier. The use tax of four per cent is applicable. Because the sale is consummated outside of Hawaii, the tax shall be based on the landed value of the merchandise; such value shall include the freight, insurance and handling charges and the seller is required to collect such taxes as provided by section 238-6, HRS, and §18-238-6. Example 2: A local wholesaler purchases machinery through a dealer doing business in Hawaii. Although the transaction is F.O.B. San Francisco (the purchaser ultimately paying the freight), the actual place of delivery of the merchandise is in Honolulu. Because the dealer is doing business in Hawaii and the sale is consummated in Hawaii, the use tax is not applicable. However, the general excise tax is applicable to the dealer and the gross receipts of the dealer should include the freight, insurance and handling charges. (h) Deduction and Credit Procedures. (1) General Rule. (A) Section 238-2(1), HRS, provides that if a licensed wholesaler, jobber or manufacturer is also engaged in business as a retailer, a use tax of one-half of one per cent shall apply on all imports and purchases, but the director shall refund to the taxpayer in the manner provided in section 231-23(d), HRS, such amount of tax as the taxpayer shall to the satisfaction of the director, establish to have been paid by the taxpayer on such imports and purchases sold by the taxpayer as a wholesaler or manufacturer. (B) Section 238-4, HRS, provides that if a licensed producer who is an importer or purchaser of certain property, as specified in §18-238-4(b), is also engaged in business as a retailer, or in any manner other than as a wholesaler, a use tax of one-half of one per cent shall apply, the same as in the case of a purchaser who is a licensed retailer. (C) In lieu of the refund method provided in section 231-23(d), HRS, a taxpayer described in this paragraph (1) may elect to compute the tax liability for purposes of this chapter under one of the methods described in paragraph (2). (2) Permissible methods. The taxpayer may receive a deduction or credit, as the case may be, for imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers that were sold by the taxpayer as a wholesaler, jobber, manufacturer or producer if the taxpayer computes the taxpayer’s liability under any of the following methods: (A) Method A (Direct Cost Method). Determine the total amount of imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. Ascertain from your records, category by category, the landed cost of the wholesale and manufacturing sales included in imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. Deduct this amount from the total imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month and compute and pay the use tax on the remaining balance. Total amount and deductions must be reflected on monthly tax returns. Example - A car dealer 1. Total retail sales for the month $75,000 2. Total wholesale sales for the month $15,000 USE TAX LAW §18-238-3 238- 5 (Unofficial Compilation as of 12/31/2025) 3. Total imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month $50,000 4. Compute cost of automobiles and accessories sold at wholesale during the month which has been included in item 3, item by item, or category by category Cost Model “X” sedans $4,000 Model “Y” delivery trucks 6,000 Model “Z” station wagons 2,000 Accessories 1,000 Total cost of wholesale sales to be excluded from the use tax basis $13,000 5. Balance subject to the use tax $37,000 (B) Method B (Percentage of wholesale sales to total sales method). Determine the total amount of imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. Ascertain the percentage of wholesale sales to total sales for the month. Apply the percentage so determined to the total amount of imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. This amount would be the amount excluded from the use tax base. Example: 1. Total retail sales for the month $85,000 2. Total wholesale sales for this month $15,000 3. Total imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month $50,000 4. Percentage of wholesale sales to total sales ($15,000 ÷ $100,000) 15% 5. Total purchases to be excluded from the use tax base ($50,000 x fifteen per cent) $ 7,500 6. Imports and purchases subject to the use tax for the month ($50,000 - $7,500) $42,500 It will be permissible for a taxpayer to use the cost of sales to arrive at the percentage ratio for the exclusion of imports or purchases from unlicensed sellers for wholesale sales to compute the use tax base, if the taxpayer has accurate records to support these costs of sales figures. A schedule of these computations must be attached to the monthly tax returns. (C) Method C (Gross profit percentage method). Determine the total amount of imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. Ascertain by gross profit percentage method the cost of wholesale sales included in imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month. Deduct this amount from the total amount of imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month and compute the use tax on the remaining balance. Example: 1. Total imports and purchases from unlicensed sellers for the month $50,000 2. Total wholesale sales for the month $10,000 The average gross profit percentage as determined by taxpayer’s records 40% Gross profit on wholesale sales $ 4,000 3. Cost of wholesale sales for the month ($ 10,000 - $4,000) 6,000 4. Balance subject to use tax for the month $44,000 Method C may be utilized only if taxpayer has good records and accounting data to compute proper gross profit percentage. (D) Method D (Other methods). The taxpayer may utilize any other method that will reflect the taxpayer’s correct tax liability, provided such method is submitted to and approved by the director. (3) Special rules for paragraph (2). The taxpayer must select and use the method that will clearly reflect the taxpayer’s correct tax liability. Whatever method is used must be used consistently. Permission to change method must have the consent of the director. However, the director may change the method used by the taxpayer anytime the director finds that the method used by the taxpayer does not reflect the taxpayer’s correct tax liability. [Eff 2/16/82; am 5/26/98 ] (Auth: HRS §§231-3(9), 238-16) (Imp: HRS §§238-2, 238-4)