HAR §12-46-318
HAR §12-46-318. Defenses
Length: 755 wordsOfficial source
Cite as Haw. Code R. § 12-46-318
(a)
Adverse impact.
It
may be a defense to a claim that a facially-neutral
practice, policy, or action has the effect of
discriminating against a person because of a protected
basis for an owner, any other person, real estate
broker, or salesperson charged with discrimination to
establish that there is a business necessity for the
practice, policy, or action.
(b)
Specific activity permitted.
It may be a
defense to a claim that a practice, policy, or action
discriminates against a person because of a protected
basis for an owner, any other person, real estate
broker, or salesperson charged with discrimination to
establish that the alleged discriminatory practice,
policy, or action is specifically permitted under this
subchapter or by sections 515-4 or 515-8, HRS.
(c)
Refusal to allow the use of a particular
assistance animal.
An owner or any other person
engaging in a real estate transaction may refuse to
46-159
C
allow a person with a disability the use of a
particular assistance animal if:
(1)
The animal poses a direct threat to the
health or safety of others and the animal's
owner or handler takes no effective action
to control the animal so that the threat is
mitigated or eliminated;
(2)
The animal would cause substantial physical
damage to the property of others that cannot
be reduced or eliminated by a reasonable
accommodation;
(3)
The presence of the assistance animal would
pose an undue financial and administrative
burden to the owner or person engaging in a
real estate transaction; or
(4)
The presence of the assistance animal would
fundamentally alter the nature of the
operations of the owner or person engaging
in a real estate transaction.
The determination of whether an assistance animal
poses a direct threat and whether the animal's owner
or handler has taken effective action to control the
animal so that the threat is mitigated or eliminated,
must be based on an individualized assessment about
the specific animal in question, such as the animal's
current conduct or recent history of overt acts.
The
determination may not be based on the animal's species
or breed.
Factors to be considered include: the
nature, duration and severity of the risk of injury;
the probability that the potential injury will
actually occur; whether reasonable modifications of
rules, policies, practices, procedures, or services
will reduce the risk; and whether the animal's owner
has taken any action that has reduced or eliminated
the risk, such as obtaining specific training,
medication, or equipment for the animal.
Denial of
the use of a particular animal does not preclude a
request to use a different animal.
Example:
1,6-160
(
Michael, who lives in an apartment building that has a
"no pets" policy, has a disability and requires the
use of Spot, an emotional support dog.
One day while
Michael and Spot are riding in the elevator, Spot
lunges and bites a guide dog owned by Cindy, who is
blind and is in the elevator at the time.
Spot
therefore poses a direct threat to the health and
safety of others.
If the direct threat can be
mitigated, for example by having Michael muzzle and
hold Spot by a short leash when Spot is in common
areas, and by having Michael and Spot refrain from
riding in the same elevator and being in the same
common areas as Cindy and her guide dog, Michael may
continue to use Spot.
However, if the direct threat
from Spot cannot be mitigated, or if Spot's continued
presence would cause an undue financial and
administrative burden, the apartment manager may deny
Michael's use of Spot, though Michael may then request
the use of a different emotional support animal." [Eff
10/15/93; am 10/6/13; comp
J
(Auth:
HRS §§368-3, 515-9(7))
(Imp: HRS §§515-1, 515-2, 515-
3, 515-4, 515-5, 515-6, 515-7, 515-9, 515-16, 515-17)
t;6-161
r
(
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Amendments to and compilation of Chapter 12-46, Hawaii
Administrative Rules, on the Summary Page dated
November 19, 2024, were adopted on November 19, 2024,
following a public hearing held on November 4, 2024,
after public notices were given in the Honolulu Star-
Advertiser, Hawaii Tribune Herald, West Hawaii Today
and The Garden Island on September 26, 2024 and
September 30, 2024, and the Maui News from September
26, 2024 through October 2, 2024.
These rules shall take effect ten days after filing
with the Office of the Lieutenant Governor.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy Attorney General
Jade T. Butay
Director of Labor and
Industrial Relations
APPROVED:
Governor
State of Hawai'i
JUL - 9 2025
Filed