HAR §16-88-81
HAR §16-88-81. care providers, for the purpose of patient evaluation
Cite as Haw. Code R. § 16-88-81
(2)
Patient records shall include the following:
(A) Identifying data (e.g., name, age, sex, occupation,
nationality, etc.);
(B)
Description of the patient's chief complaint, preferably in
the patients' own words;
(C)
History of the present illness including any concurrent
medical problems;
(D)
Past medical history (e.g., previous illnesses, surgeries,
medications,
hospitalizations,
childhood
illnesses,
accidents, injuries, pregnancies, etc.);
(E)
Current health status (e.g., allergies, current medications
and supplements, immunization history, tobacco, alcohol
or recreational drug use, exercise and leisure activities,
sleep habits, diet, environmental hazards, etc.);
(F)
Family
history
(e.g.,
familial
tendencies,
genetic
predispositions, infectious diseases, etc.);
(G)
Psychosocial disposition (e.g., brief biography, family and
home situation, occupation, lifestyle, emotional make-up,
stressors, typical daily events, etc.);
(H) Review of systems or written positive findings and
pertinent negatives;
(I)
Patient's general appearance, vital signs, and the results of
the rest of the examination whether it is regional or
comprehensive; and
(J)
Results of any laboratory studies.
(g)
Diagnostic criteria.
A naturopathic physician shall use
conventional medical diagnostic criteria in the establishment of a diagnosis,
taking into account all information recorded in subsection (f)(2). Other
diagnostic criteria may be used, including those of non-western medical
traditions. All diagnostic criteria shall be consistent with other health care
disciplines that utilize the same criteria. A naturopathic physician may use a
combination of conventional and other diagnostic criteria. A naturopathic
physician utilizing diagnostic criteria other than conventional diagnostic criteria
shall also apply conventional forms when:
(1)
A patient is also being evaluated by another health care provider
for the same or a related condition, in order to maintain
continuity among the different disciplines of medicine and to
assure quality patient care;
88-21
§16-88-81
(2)
Faced with a life threatening or degenerative illness with the
possibility that interventional therapies may be needed;
(3)
The naturopathic physician knows that a patient will need referral
for the same or other illnesses;
(4)
A patient requests it; or
(5)
As required by State law.
(h)
Assessment.
A naturopathic physician shall begin a written
assessment with a summary of the patient's medical history and physical
examination that recaps the findings in a way that supports the differential
diagnosis or working diagnosis. The assessment shall include an explanation of
the analysis and reasoning for the assessment that includes:
(1)
The type of care that is needed (e.g., immediate, acute, chronic,
long or short-term);
(2)
A discussion of naturopathic considerations; and
(3)
A patient's ability to respond to treatment based on past medical
history and the naturopathic physicians' subjective assessment.
(i)
Treatment plan. A naturopathic physician shall develop a specific
written health plan for each patient that is:
(1)
Rational and is:
(A)
Based on identified needs;
(B)
Realistic in its goals;
(C)
Practical in light of the patient's condition and situation;
(D)
In the best interest of the patient;
(E)
Logical in sequence and internally consistent;
(F)
Prioritized to the patient's most pressing conditions;
(G) Compatible with other therapies the patient may be
undergoing;
(H)
Cost effective;
(I)
Flexible to accommodate new developments, findings, and
(J)
Experimental only with informed consent and only in
areas of a naturopathic physician's expertise.
(2)
Based on proper assessment, including:
(A) Ruling out or identifying life-threatening or hidden
conditions with appropriate history, examination and
testing, including referral for specialized evaluation, when
appropriate; and
(B)
Allowing for timely on-going reassessment.
(3)
Based on naturopathic principles including:
(A)
Stimulating a patient's vital force to promote healing or,
in special instances, supplementing or replacing the action
88-22
§16-88-81
of the vital force when the patient is unable to respond to
curative treatment;
(B)
Removing the cause of conditions, when known;
(C)
Choosing treatments that pose the least risk of patient
harm;
(D)
Individualizing treatments to the whole patient, including
referral to appropriate health care providers for
specialized therapies;
(E)
Educating a patient to participate responsibly in his or her
own health care and to learn the principles for building of
health and preventing future disease;
(F)
Involving, when appropriate, others significant to a patient
in the treatment plan; and
(G)
Prevention of disease.
(4)
Self-critical, but is not limited to:
(1)
A mechanism for timely evaluation of plan effectiveness;
and
(2)
A mechanism for timely modification of failed plans,
including referral to other appropriate health care
providers.
(j)
Consent to treatment. A naturopathic physician shall inform a
patient of the patient's right to informed consent and freedom of choice in health
care and present the patient with all the options for medical care in an unbiased
manner. A naturopathic physician may express his or her opinion as to the
quality of the different types of health care options, or if requested to by the
patient.
(k)
Patient participation. A naturopathic physician shall encourage
patient participation in a patient's own health care as it is recognized that such
participation leads to better compliance and a faster recovery. The naturopathic
physician shall assess whether a patient has the ability to participate; provided
that this assessment shall include the:
(1)
Ability of the patient to understand the nature of the illness;
(2)
Ability of the patient to understand the medical options available
and their consequences;
(3)
Patient's mental status; and
(4)
Ability of the patient to make an informed consent.
(l)
Goals and priorities of the naturopathic physician and patient.
The naturopathic physician, patient, or a combination of both shall set the goals
and priorities. If in the opinion of the naturopathic physician, a patient makes a
88-23
§16-88-81
choice that may be harmful to the patient, the naturopathic physician shall
document this in the patient's records, and:
(1) Inform the patient of such, and offer to continue or resume treating
the patient if the patient so desires;
(2) Refuse to participate further in the health care of the patient by both
verbal and written notice to patient; or
(3) Refer the patient to another health care provider.
(m)
Family participation. Family members may participate in setting
goals and priorities at the discretion of the patient or naturopathic physician. In
the event that a patient is unable to make choices for himself or herself or
participate in the patient's health care, the patient's spouse, parent, eldest or
designated child, or court appointed guardian or advocate shall participate on the
patient's behalf.
(n)
Progress review. A naturopathic physician shall determine when
health care plans should be reviewed, and shall be reviewed in the event the
patient fails to progress.
(o)
Patient progress assessment. A naturopathic physician shall
assess patient progress using subjective evaluation and objective measurement of
progress when appropriate. Subjective evaluation of assessment is solicited
from the patient, recorded by the physician, and is a gauge of progress.
Objective measurement of progress can be determined by the restoration of
function or decrease in symptoms using such methods as physical
measurements, function scales, or by appropriate diagnostic, laboratory, and
imaging methods.
(1)
A naturopathic physician shall measure patient progress against
the naturopathic physician's prognosis to determine the
naturopathic physician's response to a patient's treatment.
(A) If the assessed progress is deemed appropriate, the
treatment plan should be continued. Treatment would be
discontinued when sufficient progress had been achieved,
or revised, based upon the patient's response;
(B)
Lack of appropriate progress could indicate the need for
reevaluation of the treatment plan or the need for
reevaluation of the condition or underlying basis of the
condition being treated; or
(C)
In cases where no progress is made, at some point the
determination to refer the patient for consultation with
another health care provider may be necessary. The
timing of such determination is based in part upon the
prognosis in the patient's case. A referral for this purpose
88-24
§16-88-81
shall be made in a timely manner, to preserve the health
of the patient.
(2)
A naturopathic physician may consult with a patient's family
members in the assessment of progress. A naturopathic physician
shall encourage the patient to seek a second opinion if the patient
disagrees with the naturopathic physician's assessment of
progress. The naturopathic physician shall inform the patient of
the patient's progress, through family or individual conferences,
periodic or yearly evaluations, by letter or phone consultation;
refer the patient to another health care provider if no progress is
being made after a reasonable length of time; and change the
treatment protocol based upon reevaluation of the case.
(p)
The failure to comply with any of the provisions of this section
shall subject a licensee to discipline under chapter 455, HRS, and this chapter.
[Eff and comp 4/13/12] (Auth: HRS §455-6) (Imp: HRS §§455-6, 455-11)
88-25
Amendments to and compilation of chapter 16-88, Hawaii Administrative
Rules, on the Summary page dated February 10, 2012, were adopted on February
10, 2012, following a public hearing held on February 10, 2012, after public notice
was given in the Star Advertiser, The Garden Island, The Maui News, West
Hawaii Today, and Hawaii Tribune-Herald on January 8, 2012.
They shall take effect ten days after filing with the Office of the
Lieutenant Governor.
/s/ Michael L. Traub, N.D.
MICHAEL L. TRAUB, N.D., Chairperson
Board of Naturopathic Medicine
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date 3/15/12
/s/ Rodney J. Tam
Deputy Attorney General
APPROVED:
Date 3/27/12
/s/ Kealii S. Lopez
KEALII S. LOPEZ, Director
Commerce and Consumer Affairs
APPROVED:
Date 3/30/12
/s/ Neil Abercrombie
NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Governor
State of Hawaii
April 3, 2012
Filed
88-27
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Amendment and Compilation of Chapter 16-88
Hawaii Administrative Rules
February 10, 2012
SUMMARY
1.
A new