90-1

Opinion 90-1

Year: 1990Length: 973 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Idaho Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-1

( .. " .. __ . 1 _ ~ _ STATE OF IDAHO OFFICE OF iHE ATTORNEY GENERAL JIM JONES ATTORNEY GENERAL BOiSe: 83720 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 90-1 TELEPHONE 12081 334-2400 TO: The Honorable Lydia Justice Edwards Idaho state Treasurer Statehouse Mail Per Request for Attorney General's Opinion QUESTION PRESENTED: Are interest earnings upon license revenues in the fish and game account required to be credited to the fish and game account? CONCLUSION: Yes. Regulations of the U.S. Fish and wildlife Service (50 CFR 80) were amended effective May 17, 1989, to require this result as a condition to remain eligible to receive federal aid funds (pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson Act funds). Since the state is receiving such federal aid funds, it should credit interest earnings on revenues from fish and game license fees to the fish and game account. ANALYSIS: Idaho Code § 67-1210 provides, in pertinent part, with respect to interest earnings on state accounts: The interest received on all such investments, unless otherwise specifically required by law, shall be paid into the general account of the state of Idaho. The Honorable Lydia Justice Edwards Page 2 Provided, unless otherwise specifically provided by _-~statut~-j funds received by the state pursuant to a federal law, regulation, or federal-state agreement which governs disposition of interest earned upon such funds shall be classified in the agency asset fund provided by section 57-811, Idaho Code. Any interest earned upon such funds shall be accounted for separately to give effect to the federal law, regulation, or federal-state agreement. Thus, interest earnings upon balances in the various state accounts are credited to the general account unless otherwise specifically required by law, including federal laws and regulations. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 36-1801 and 36-1802, the state assents to the provisions of the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell- Johnson Acts, which provide aid to the states for wildlife restoration and fish restoration projects. Those federal acts (16 U.S.C. 777 and 16 U.S.C. 669i) and the regulations implementing them (50 CFR 80) provide that revenues from license fees paid by hunters and fishermen shall not be diverted to purposes other than administration of the state fish and wildlife agency. 50 CFR 80.4(a) was amended effective May 17, 1989, to provide: License revenues include income from: . . . (3) Interest , dividends, or other income earned on license revenues. since license revenues may not be diverted and since license revenues are defined to include interest earnings thereon, the state is now required to credit the fish and game account with interest earnings upon license revenues. We have also considered the required timing of our implementation of the requirement to credit interest earnings to the fish and game account. The effective date of the federal amendments is described in the Federal Register of April 17, 1989, page 15209, in pertinent part, as follows: The effective date of this revision is 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, it is recognized that some states may need to enact legislation to meet the requirements of this provision. Therefore, for those states a period not to exceed 3 years after the effective date of the rule will be -, The Honorab~e Lydia Justice Edwards Page 3 allowed in order to enact the needed legislation. All .--other states will need to be in compliance, and remain in compliance, on or after the effective date. Idaho statutes do allow crediting of interest to the fish and game account for the current fiscal year. As noted previously, Idaho Code § 67-1210 authorizes the crediting of interest as required by federal regulations. consequently, no legislation is required to implement a change in procedures to begin crediting the fish and game account with interest earnings from the fish and game account. However, as discussed below, crediting interest to the fish and game account for interest lost during the last fiscal year would require legislation. Idaho Const. art. 7, § 13, provides: No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in pursuance of appropriations made by law. since appropriations are made on a fiscal year basis, it is not a violation of Idaho Const. art 7, § l3, to make necessary corrections in accounts within a fiscal year. By making corrections within a fiscal year, each account merely receives the correct amount of revenue for the fiscal year and the correct amount of revenue is available for the legislative appropriations made from each account. However, the result is not the same for corrections beyond a fiscal year. Idaho Code § 67-3604 requires the state auditor to close his accounts as to all appropriations on July 1 of each year. Thus, in state v. Adams, 90 Idaho 195, 409 P.2d 415 (1965), the Idaho Supreme Court held that Idaho Const. art. 7, § 13, prohibited the state from refunding to a county the state's share of a court-ordered refund of taxes collected wrongfully in prior years without a legislative appropriation. Accordingly, for the current fiscal year, necessary corrections in accounts can be made to reflect interest earnings due to the fish and game account. A legislative appropriation would be required to credit the f ish and game account with interest earned in the last fiscal year. AUTHORITIES CONSIDERED: I. Constitutions Idaho Constitution, art. 7, § 13. ( The Honorable Lydia Justice Edwards page 4 2. statutes 16 U.S.C. 777. 16 U.S.C. 669i. Idaho Code § 36-1801. Idaho Code § 36-1802. Idaho Code § 67-1210. Idaho Code § 67-3604. 3. Cases state v. Adams, 90 Idaho 195, 409 P.2d 415 (1965). 4. Other Federal Register, April 17, 1989, page 15209. 50 CFR 80 (Regulation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). DATED this 31st day of May, 1990. JIM JONES Attorney General state of Idaho Analysis by: DAVID G. HIGH Deputy Attorney General Chief, Business Regulation and State Finance Division
90-1: Opinion 90-1 | Justis AI