82-012
Power of a County to Provide Police Protection
Cite as Ill. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-012
5
STATE B STATE
TYRONE C. FAHNER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD
May 14, 1982
FILE NO, 82-012
COUNTIES:
Power of a County to
Provide Police Protection
-
Honorable Gary L. Spencer
State's Attorney, Whiteside County
Whiteside County Court House
Morrison, Illinois 61270
Dear Mr. Spencer:
I have your letter in which you inquire whether, in
view of the powers and duties vested in the office of sheriff
by the Illinois Constitution of 1970, statute, and the common
law, a non-home-rule county possesses the authority to create a
police agency of the county which is independent of the
sheriff. For the reasons hereinafter stated, it is my opinion
that a non-home-rule county possesses no power to create such
an agency.
Honorable Gary L. Spencer - 2.
The office of sheriff is created by the Constitution.
(Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, § 4(c).) The sheriff is the
principal executive officer of his county, and may exercise the
powers of a sheriff at common law, except as such common law
powers have been altered by the Constitution, statute, or
ordinance. (Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, § 4(d); People V.
Nellis (1911), 249 Ill. 12, 23; Dahnke V. People (1895), 57
Ill. App. 619, 627, aff'd 168 Ill. 102 (1897).) Statutory
provisions pertaining to the powers and duties of the office of
sheriff are largely declaratory of common law. (People V.
Cermak (1925), 239 Ill. App. 195, 199.) A county may not, by
ordinance, alter duties of a sheriff which are imposed by
statute. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 34, par. 429.18.)
By statute, the sheriff is conservator of the peace in
his county, with the duty to keep the peace and the power to
pursue, apprehend, and arrest offenders. (Ill. Rev. Stat.
1979, ch. 125, pars. 17, 81, 82.) The sheriff is required to
serve, execute, and return all warrants, process, orders and
judgments within his county, which are legally directed or
delivered to him. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 125, par. 15.)
The sheriff is required, in person or by deputy, to attend upon
all courts held in his or her county. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979,
ch. 125, par. 19, as amended by P.A. 82-472, effective
January 1, 1982.) The sheriff is the warden of the county
Honorable Gary L. Spencer - 3.
jail, with the duty to receive and confine all persons com-
mitted to his custody by any competent authority. (Ill. Rev.
Stat. 1979, ch. 75, pars. 2, 4.) To assist in the performance
of the duties of his office, the sheriff is authorized to
appoint one or more deputies, not exceeding the number allowed
by the county board of his county. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch.
125, par. 7.) Duly appointed deputy sheriffs may perform any
and all of the duties of the sheriff, in the name of the
sheriff, and the acts of his deputies are held to be the acts
of the sheriff. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 125, par. 12.)
Non-home rule counties, being mere creatures of the
State, can exercise only those powers expressly delegated by
the constitution or statute, or those which arise by necessary
implication from expressly-granted powers. (Ill. Const. 1970,
art. VII, § 7; Heidenreich V. Ronske (1962), 26 Ill. 2d 360,
362; 1973 Ill. Att'y Gen. Op. 18, 19.) Counties are granted no
specific statutory power to create or form police agencies
separate from the office of sheriff, nor is this power neces-
sarily implied from the power to furnish police services to the
county. (See, Connelly V. County of Clark (1973), 16 Ill. App.
3d 947, 949.) Rather, counties have the general statutory
power to provide police protection through the office of the
sheriff. 1980 Ill. Att'y Gen. Op. 60, 62.
Furthermore, it is well established that when the
constitution or statutes of the State create an office,
Honorable Gary L. Spencer - 4.
prescribe the duties of its incumbent, and provide for his
compensation and expenses, no person or board has the authority
to expend, or to authorize the expenditure of other public
funds for the purpose of performing the duties which are imposed upon such officer. (Ashton V. County of Cook (1943), 384
Ill. 287, 300; Stevens V. Henry County (1905), 218 Ill. 468,
478-79; Abbott V. County of Adams (1919), 214 Ill. App. 201,
206.) The creation and operation of an independent county
police agency to provide police protection to the county would
obviously require the expenditure of public funds to perform
duties already imposed upon the sheriff. Thus, the creation of
such an agency would exceed the authority of the county board
to expend public funds. Instead, if additional manpower is
necessary to provide adequate police protection within a
county, sufficient funds should be appropriated to the sheriff
to augment the number of his deputies, to enable him to perform
the duties and functions ascribed to his office. See, People
V. Cermak (1925), 239 Ill. App. 195, 201.
For the reasons hereinabove stated, it is my opinion
that a non-home-rule county is without power to create an independent agency or other police body to perform all or part of
the duties and functions imposed upon the office of sheriff.
Very truly yours,
ATTORNEY GENERAL