32 Ill. Adm. Code 332.210
Technical Criteria for Byproduct Material Disposal Sites - Siting Criteria
Section 332
Section 332.210 Technical
Criteria for Byproduct Material Disposal Sites − Siting Criteria
a) Byproduct material shall be disposed of in a manner that
provides containment of the material by preventing disturbances and dispersion
by natural forces, and by doing so without active maintenance. In evaluating a
byproduct material disposal site, the Agency shall consider:
1) Remoteness from populated areas;
2) Hydrologic and other natural conditions as they contribute to
continued immobilization and isolation of contaminants from groundwater
sources; and
3) Potential for minimizing erosion, disturbances, and dispersion
by natural forces over the long term.
b) The disposal site selection shall be an optimization, to the
maximum extent achievable, of the features listed in subsection (a). At a
minimum, however:
1) The disposal site shall not be within a distance of 2.5 km
(1.5 miles) from the boundary of any municipality without the consent of the
governing body of the municipality. The disposal area must incorporate a
distance between any waste disposal unit and the control boundary that is of adequate
dimensions to carry out required environmental monitoring activities and
remediation activities if necessary. In most cases, a distance of 100 meters
would be adequate;
2) The tailings and waste disposal site shall not be located in a
100-year flood plain, as defined in the rules of the Illinois Department of
Transportation, 92 Ill. Adm. Code 706.Subpart C;
3) The characteristics of the disposal site shall allow
prediction, analysis and monitoring of any migration of effluents, e.g., the
site geology must be simple enough to allow reliable hydrological modeling;
4) The depth to the water table at the disposal site shall not
permit groundwater intrusion, perennial or otherwise, into the waste;
5) The natural characteristics of the disposal site, such as
hydrology, geology, and topography, shall contribute to continued
immobilization and containment, and shall ensure that waste will be contained
within the disposal site boundary for a period of at least 1,000 years after
the decommissioning;
6) The disposal site shall not be located where other facilities,
activities or land uses could adversely impact the ability of the site to meet
the technical criteria of this Part, or mask the environmental impacts of the
disposal area;
7) The disposal area structure shall not be located above a
geologic fault system. The disposal site geology must be stable; i.e., mass
wasting, erosion, slumping, or land sliding shall not adversely affect the
long-term containment; and
8) The disposal area shall not be located near a capable fault
that could cause a maximum credible earthquake larger than the disposal area
could reasonably be expected to withstand. As used in this Part, the term
"capable fault" has the same meaning as defined in section III(g) of
10 CFR 100, appendix A, in effect on January 1, 1989, exclusive of subsequent
amendments or editions. The term "maximum credible earthquake" means
an earthquake that would cause the maximum vibratory ground motion based upon
an evaluation of earthquake potential considering the regional and local
geology and seismology and specific characteristics of local subsurface
material.
c) When evaluating disposal sites, the Agency shall place
emphasis on containment of byproduct material, a matter having long-term
impacts, as opposed to consideration only of short-term convenience, impacts or
benefits. While containment of byproduct material will be a function of both
site and engineering design, major consideration shall be given to siting
features that pertain to the long-term nature of the hazards.
d) To avoid the proliferation of small byproduct material
disposal sites and reduce perpetual surveillance obligations, byproduct
material from in situ extraction operations, such as residues from solution evaporation
or contaminated control processes, and wastes from small remote aboveground
extraction operations shall be disposed of at existing large byproduct material
disposal sites; unless, considering the nature of the wastes, such as their
volume and specific activity, and the cost and environmental impacts of
transporting the wastes to large disposal sites, such offsite disposal is
demonstrated to be impracticable or the advantages of onsite burial clearly
outweigh the benefits of reducing the perpetual surveillance obligations.