32 Ill. Adm. Code 605.40
Experience of the Firm; Performance History Requirements
Section 605
Section 605.40 Experience of
the Firm; Performance History Requirements
a) The Agency shall select as contractor a proposer who has
demonstrated an ability to design, develop, construct, operate and close a
low-level radioactive waste disposal facility that incorporates the best
available management technologies that are economically reasonable,
technologically feasible and environmentally sound. When evaluating whether a
proposer has demonstrated this ability, the Agency shall evaluate the
proposer's experience developing and operating a low-level radioactive waste
storage, treatment or disposal facility. If a proposer does not have experience
in both the development and operation of a low-level radioactive waste disposal
facility, the Agency shall evaluate the proposer's experience as either a
low-level radioactive waste disposal facility developer or as a disposal
facility operator, or the proposer's experience in radioactive materials
management, hazardous materials management, nuclear fuel cycle facility design,
construction, or operation, or other related experience presented by the proposer.
b) The proposer shall provide a complete performance history of
its activities as described in subsection (a). When evaluating the proposer's
experience, the Agency shall consider for each project:
1) general information about the project, including:
A) the facility and its location;
B) the capacity of the facility;
C) the actual performance of the facility;
D) the type of storage, treatment or disposal method used;
E) the proposer's role in the project (i.e., design, construction,
operation);
F) project initiation and completion dates;
G) current facility status and, if closed, the reason for closure;
H) the proposer's client;
I) current facility manager business address and phone;
2) the complexity and scope of the previous project, such as, but
not limited to, the previous projects' budget, duration, staffing and
regulatory complexity;
3) the success of the project, i.e., whether the proposer met the
objectives of the project in a timely manner, without exceeding anticipated
costs and in a manner consistent with regulatory requirements, as well as
whether the client was satisified with the proposer's performance;
4) whether the proposer has ever forfeited a performance bond or
neglected to fulfill contract responsibilities;
5) whether the proposer has ever initiated or defended litigation
arising from the activities, as described in the performance history, as well
as the nature and outcome of the litigation;
6) the proposer's history with respect to licensing and
regulatory compliance, including any record of safety violations or other compliance
problems; and
7) any other information provided by the proposer.