35 Ill. Adm. Code 310.703
Criteria
Section 310
Section 310.703Â Criteria
a)        General Criteria. A request for an FDF determination may be
approved only if the following are true:
1)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â There is an applicable categorical pretreatment standard that specifically
controls the pollutant for which alternative limits have been requested;
2)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Factors relating to the discharge controlled by the
categorical pretreatment standard are fundamentally different from the factors
considered by USEPA in establishing the standards; and
3)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The request for an FDF determination is made in accordance
with the procedural requirements in Section 310.711 and 310.712.
b)        Criteria Applicable to Less Stringent Limits. An FDF
determination request for the establishment of limits less stringent than
required by the standard may be approved only if the following are true:
1)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The alternative limit requested is no less stringent than
justified by the fundamental difference;
2)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The alternative limit will not result in a violation of
prohibitive discharge standards prescribed by or established under Sections
310.201 through 310.213, or 35 Ill. Adm. Code 307;
3)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The alternative limit will not result in a non-water quality
environmental impact (including energy requirements) fundamentally more adverse
than the impact considered during the development of the pretreatment
standards; and
4)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Compliance with the standards (either by using the
technologies upon which the standards are based or by using other control
alternatives) would result in a non-water quality environmental impact
(including energy requirements) fundamentally more adverse than the impact
considered during the development of the standards.
c)        Criteria Applicable to More Stringent Limits. An FDF
determination request for the establishment of limits more stringent than
required by the standards may be approved only if the following are true:
1)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The alternative limit request is no more stringent than
justified by the fundamental difference; and
2)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Compliance with the alternative limit would not result in a
non-water quality environmental impact (including energy requirements)
fundamentally more adverse than the impact considered during development of the
standards.
BOARD NOTE: Â Â Derived from 40 CFR 403.13(c) (2003).