35 Ill. Adm. Code 730.108
Mechanical Integrity
Section 730
Section 730.108 Mechanical
Integrity
a) The owner or operator must demonstrate mechanical integrity
when required by other Sections. An injection well has mechanical integrity if
both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
1) There is no significant leak in the casing, tubing, or packer;
and
2) There is no significant fluid movement into an underground
source of drinking water through vertical channels adjacent to the injection
bore.
b) One of the following tests must be used to demonstrate the
absence of significant leaks pursuant to subsection (a)(1):
1) Following an initial pressure test, monitoring of the
tubing-casing annulus pressure with sufficient frequency to be representative,
as determined by the Agency, while maintaining an annulus pressure different
from atmospheric pressure measured at the surface; or
2) A pressure test with liquid or gas.
c) One of the following methods may be used to determine the
absence of significant fluid movement pursuant to subsection (a)(2):
1) The results of a temperature or noise log;
2) For Class III injection wells where the nature of the casing
precludes the use of the logging techniques prescribed at subsection (c)(1),
cementing records demonstrating the presence of adequate cement to prevent
migration; or
3) For Class III injection wells where the Agency elects to rely
on cementing records to demonstrate the absence of significant fluid movement,
the monitoring program prescribed by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 730.113(b) must be
designed to verify the absence of significant fluid movement.
d) The Agency may allow the use of a test to demonstrate
mechanical integrity other than those listed in subsections (b) and (c). To
obtain approval, the owner or operator must submit a written request to the
Agency that sets forth the proposed test and all technical data supporting its
use. The Agency must approve the request if the test will reliably demonstrate
the mechanical integrity of wells for which its use is proposed.
e) In conducting and evaluating the tests enumerated in this
Section or others to be allowed by the Agency, the owner or operator and the
Agency must apply methods and standards generally accepted in the industry.
When the owner or operator reports the results of mechanical integrity tests to
the Agency, it must include a description of the test and the method used. In
making its evaluation, the Agency must review monitoring and other test data
submitted since the previous evaluation.
f) The Agency may require additional or alternative tests if the
results presented by the owner or operator pursuant to subsection (e) are not
satisfactory to the Agency to demonstrate that there is no movement of fluid
into or between USDWs resulting from the injection activity.