44 Ill. Adm. Code 1120.2005
General Provisions
Section 1120
Section 1120.2005 General
Provisions
a) Late Bids or Proposals, Late Withdrawals and Late
Modifications
1) Definition. Any bid or proposal received after the time and
date for receipt, and at other than the specified location, is late. A bid that
is delivered to the wrong location but that is subsequently delivered to the
correct location by the date and time specified shall be considered, but the
IOC shall not be responsible for ensuring such subsequent delivery. Any
withdrawal or modification of a bid or proposal received after the time and
date set for opening of bids or proposals is late. If received at other than
the specified location, the submission is late.
2) Treatment. No late bid or proposal, late modification, or
late withdrawal will be considered unless the CPO, and not a designee,
determines it would have been timely but for the action or inaction of IOC
personnel directly serving the procurement activity (e.g., providing the wrong
address).
3) Records. Records shall be made and, in accordance with the
State Records Act [5 ILCS 160], kept for each late bid or proposal, late
modification, or late withdrawal.
4) Other Submissions. Any other submission that has a time or
date deadline shall be treated in the same manner as a late bid.
b) Extension of Time
1) The Procurement Officer may, prior to the date or time for
submitting or modifying, extend the date or time for the convenience of the
IOC. Reasons for extension include, but are not limited to, allowing
additional time for submissions to account for inclement weather or accidents
and for other such reasons.
2) All notices under this subsection (b) will be provided
electronically and posted on the Illinois Procurement Bulletin.
c) Electronic and Facsimile Submissions
1) The IFB or RFP may state that electronic and facsimile machine
submissions will be considered if they are received at the designated office
by the time and date set for receipt. Any required attachments will be
submitted as stated in the IFB or RFP.
2) Electronic submissions authorized by specific language in the
IFB or RFP will be opened in accordance with electronic security measures in
effect at the IOC at the time of opening. Unless the electronic submission
procedures provide for a secure receipt, vendor assumes risk of premature
disclosure due to submission in unsealed form.
3) Fax submissions authorized by specific language in the IFB or
RFP will be placed in a sealed container upon receipt and opened as other
submissions. Vendor assumes risk of premature disclosure due to submission in
unsealed form.
d) Intent to Submit
The IFB or RFP
may require that vendors submit, by a certain time and date, a notice of their
intent to submit a bid or proposal in response to the IFB or RFP. Bids and
proposals submitted without complying with the notice of intent requirement may
be rejected.
e) Only One Bid or Proposal Received
If only one
bid or proposal is received, an award may be made to the single bidder or
offeror if the CPO finds that the price submitted is fair and reasonable, and
that either other prospective bidders had reasonable opportunity to respond or
there is not adequate time for resolicitation. Otherwise:
1) new bids or offers may be solicited, including under sole
source (Section 1120.2025) or emergency (Section 1120.2030) procedures;
2) the procurement may be canceled.
f) Alternate or Multiple Bids or Proposals
Alternate bids or proposals may be accepted if:
1) permitted by the solicitation and in accordance with
instructions in the solicitation; or
2) only one vendor responded, in which case the alternate
submission may be evaluated and treated in accordance with Section 1120.2025;
or
3) the low bidder, who has met all requirements of the
solicitation, has provided a lower cost alternative that meets all of the
material requirements of the specifications.
g) Multiple Items
An IFB or RFP
may call for pricing of multiple items of similar or related type with award
based on individual line item, group total of certain items, or grand total of
all items.
h) "All or None" Bids or Proposals
All or none
bids or proposals may be accepted if the evaluation shows an all or none award
to be in the State's best interest.
i) Conditioning Bids or Proposals Upon Other Awards
Any bid or
proposal that is conditioned upon receiving award of the particular contract
being solicited and one or more other State contracts shall:
1) be rejected unless the vendor removes the condition; or
2) be evaluated and award made to that vendor if the vendor is
also independently evaluated as the winner of the other IFBs or RFPs, provided
the agency need not delay procurement actions to accommodate the vendor's all
or none condition.
j) Clarification of Bids and Proposals
The Procurement
Officer may request that a vendor clarify its bid or proposal as a part of the
evaluation process. A vendor shall not be allowed to materially change its bid
or proposal in response to a request for clarification.
k) Extension of Time on Indefinite Quantity Contracts.
The time of
performance of an indefinite quantity contract may be extended upon agreement
of the parties, provided the extension is for 90 days or less and the Procurement
Officer determines in writing that it is not practical to award another contract
at the time of the extension. A clarification is not an opportunity for
discussion or for submission of Best & Finals as authorized elsewhere in
this Part.
l) Increase in Quantity on Definite Quantity Contracts
1) The quantity that may be ordered from a definite quantity
contract without additional notice and competition may be increased by up to
20% provided the Procurement Officer determines that separate bidding for the
additional quantity is not likely to achieve lower pricing.
2) The quantity may be increased by any percentage provided the
dollar value of the increase does not exceed the small purchase threshold
applicable to the type of good or service.
m) Subsequent Purchase
Request
If, within 30 days after making an
award to a particular vendor pursuant to a competitive sealed bid on behalf of
IOC, the CPO receives a purchase request for the same item and for the same or
lesser quantity, the CPO may contract with that vendor on the same terms and
conditions, including price, without additional notice and competition, if such
a contract is acceptable to the vendor.
n) Novation or Change of Name
1) Assignment. No IOC contract is transferable, or otherwise
assignable, without the written consent of the Procurement Officer; however, a vendor
may assign monies receivable under a contract after due notice to the IOC.
Assignment may require the execution of a contract with the assignee and, in those
cases, the assignee must meet all requirements for contracting with the IOC.
2) Recognition of a Successor in Interest; Novation. When in the
best interest of the State, a successor in interest may be recognized in a
novation agreement in which the transferor and the transferee agree that:
A) the transferee assumes all of the transferor's obligations;
B) the transferee meets all requirements for contracting with the
State;
C) the transferor waives all rights under the contract as against
the IOC; and
D) unless the transferor guarantees performance of the contract by
the transferee, the transferee shall, if required by the IOC, furnish a
satisfactory performance bond.
3) Change of Name. A vendor may submit to the Procurement
Officer a written request to change the name in which it holds a contract with
the State. The name change shall not alter any of the terms and conditions of
the contract or the obligations of the vendor.
o) Contracting for Installment Purchase Payments, Including
Interest.
Contracts may
provide for installment purchase payments, including interest charges, over a
period of time. The interest rate may not exceed that established by law,
including the Bond Authorization Act [30 ILCS 305].
p) Use of Source Selection
Method that is Not Required
If IOC uses a method of source
selection that it is not required by law to use (e.g., use of competitive
sealed bid for a small purchase), the IOC is not bound to strict compliance
with the Code and the rules governing the method of source selection used.
q) Vendor Signature
A bid or proposal submitted
unsigned will be evaluated if the vendor submits a written signature acceptable
to the Procurement Officer within the time specified by the CPO.
r) Stringing
Dividing or planning procurements
to avoid the use of competitive procedures (stringing) is prohibited.
s) Confidential Data
Vendors must clearly identify any
information that is exempt from the disclosure requirement of the Freedom of
Information Act [5 ILCS 140] and must request special handling of that
material. It is the sole obligation of vendors to redact confidential
information from bids or offers submitted to IOC. Failure to submit redacted
copies will result in the release of bids or offers in response to requests
made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
t) Documentation of
Procurement Actions
1) The
Procurement Officer shall maintain in the procurement or associated contract
file all substantive documents and records of communications that pertain to
the procurement and any resulting contract. This shall include, as applicable,
but is not limited to:
A) Procurement
Bulletin postings;
B) Solicitation
documents (e.g., IFBs) and all amendments, clarifications and Best & Final
requests;
C) Vendor's
responses, including clarifications and responses to Best & Final requests;
D) Evaluation
materials (e.g., scoring guidelines and forms, completed score sheets for
individual evaluators (including notes), evaluation committee's combined score
sheets, evaluation committee's recommendations, and management's decision);
E) Protests
and resolutions;
F) Contracts
and any orders, changes, amendments, renewals or extensions.
2) All
information from subsection (t)(1), less any information exempt from disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act, shall be prepared and made available for
inspection and copying, with information from subsections (t)(1)(A) through (D)
made available on the date any award is posted to the Bulletin.
u) Communications Related
to Procurement
1) Any
IOC employee who receives a written or oral communication that imparts or
requests material information or makes a material argument regarding potential
action concerning a procurement matter, including but not limited to an
application, contract or project, shall report the communication to the IOC
PPB.
2) A
communication must be reported if it is material, if it regards a potential
action, if it relates to a procurement matter and if it is not otherwise
excluded from reporting.
A) Materiality
i) "Material
information" is information that a reasonable person would deem important
in determining his or her course of action. It is information pertaining to
significant issues, including, but not limited to, price, quantity and terms of
payment or performance.
ii) A "material
argument" is a communication that a reasonable person would believe was
made for the purpose of influencing a decision relating to a procurement
matter. It does not include general information about products, services or
industry best practices, or a response to communications initiated by an
employee of the IOC for purposes of providing information for the evaluation of
new products, trends, services or technologies.
iii) In
determining whether a communication is material, the State employee may
consider:
• Whether
the information conveyed is new or already known to the IOC (or repeated or
restated privately) and other participants in the communication; and
• The likelihood
that the information would influence a pending procurement matter.
B) A "potential
action" is one that a reasonable person would believe could affect the
initiation, development or outcome of a procurement matter.
3) This
Section does not apply to the following communications:
A) Communication
regarding the procurement of items that have a contract value less than the
small purchase amount stated in Section 1120.2020;
B) Communications made in a
public forum;
C) Communications
regarding matters of procedure and practice, such as format, the number of
copies required, the manner of filing, and the status of the matter;
D) Communications
regarding the administration and implementation of an existing contract (see 30
ILCS 500/50-39(a));
E) Communication between
the IOC employee and:
i) the
Comptroller;
ii) other State employees
of the IOC;
iii) employees of the
Executive Ethics Commission;
iv) an
employee of another State agency who, through the communication, is either:
• exercising
his or her experience or expertise in the subject matter of the particular
procurement in the normal course of business, for official purposes, and at the
initiation of the purchasing agency or the appropriate CPO; or
• exercising
oversight, supervisory or management authority over the procurement in the
normal course of business and as part of official responsibilities;
F) Unsolicited
communications providing general information about products, services or
industry best practices, prior to those products or services becoming involved
in a procurement matter;
G) Communications
received in response to procurement solicitations pursuant to the Code,
including, but not limited to, vendor responses to an RFI, RFP, Request for
Qualifications or IFB, or a small purchase, sole source or emergency
solicitation, and questions and answers posted to the Bulletin to supplement
the procurement action. This exemption is not applicable unless the
communications are made in accordance with the instructions contained in the
procurement solicitation, procedures or guidelines;
H) Communications
that are privileged, protected or confidential under law;
I) Communications
that are part of the formal procurement process as set out by statute, rule or
procedure, such as the posting of procurement opportunities, the process for
approving a Procurement Business Case (as defined in 2 Ill. Adm. Code
1620.825(i)) or its equivalent, fiscal approval, submission of bids, the
finalizing of contract terms and conditions with an awardee or apparent
awardee, and similar formal procurement processes.
4) Notwithstanding
any exemption provided in subsection (u)(3), an IOC employee must report any
communication that imparts or requests material information or makes a material
argument regarding a potential action concerning a procurement matter if the
employee reasonably believes the communication was made for any improper
purpose, including, but not limited to, providing an improper benefit, monetary
or non-monetary, to any person or entity.
5) As
soon as is practicable, but in no event more than 30 days after receipt of the
communication or the first of a series of communications described in
subsection (u)(2), the State employee shall report the communication in accordance
with Section 50-39 of the Code.
6) For purposes of this
Section, "State employee" means:
A) any
person employed full-time, part-time or pursuant to a personal services
contract with the State and whose employment duties are subject to the direction
and control of an employer with regard to the material details of how the work
is to be performed; or
B) any
appointed or elected commissioner, trustee, director or member of a board of a
State agency; or
C) any
other person appointed to a position in or with a State agency, regardless of
whether the position is compensated.
7) For
purposes of this Section, "public forum" includes any meeting that
satisfies the notice requirements contained in Section 2.02 of the Open
Meetings Act [5 ILCS 120/2.02], but also other public events that are
advertised and generally open to the public. A meeting may be a public forum
even if a reasonable fee is required. Examples include educational seminars
and conferences.