56 Ill. Adm. Code 2920.5
Ineligibility To Receive Benefits Due To Performing Full-Time Work Or Due To The Receipt Of Various Income Whose Sum Is Equal To Or Greater Than The Individual's Weekly Benefit Amount
Section 2920
Section 2920.5 Ineligibility
To Receive Benefits Due To Performing Full-Time Work Or Due To The Receipt Of
Various Income Whose Sum Is Equal To Or Greater Than The Individual's Weekly
Benefit Amount
a) An individual shall be ineligible for benefits with respect to
any week for which the individual receives or is entitled to receive any of the
following payments whose aggregate amount is equal to or exceeds such
individual's weekly benefit amount:
1) Payments made during an announced shutdown for inventory or
vacation purposes which are treated as wages under Section 2920.25;
2) Payments made in connection with any separation or layoff as,
or in the nature of, vacation pay, vacation pay allowance, or pay in lieu of
vacation treated as wages under Section 2920.30 which are made during a period
designated by the employer;
3) Holiday pay treated as wages under Section 2920.35;
4) Wages for services performed by an individual for any week of
less than full time work except those wages for "services performed by an
individual in self-employment" as defined by Section 2920.1.
A) Example 1: An individual files for benefits after a layoff and
the weekly benefit amount is $130.00. The individual is eligible to receive 3
days of vacation pay at $50.00 per day during the week in question, an amount
which would be treated as wages under Section 2920.25. The individual is
ineligible to receive benefits or waiting week credit under this subsection
with respect to that week because the entitlement to $150.00 in vacation pay
treated as wages under Section 2920.25 exceeds the weekly benefit amount.
B) Example 2: An individual files for benefits after a layoff.
The weekly benefit amount is $130.00. The individual performs services which
are not employment under Section 212 of the Act. Even if the individual
receives or is entitled to receive payments for these services in amounts in
excess of the weekly benefit amount, the individual is not ineligible for benefits
under this subsection because the services performed by the individual were in
self-employment and hence the remuneration received for these services does not
render the individual ineligible for benefits under subsection (a)(4). The
individual may, however, be ineligible under Section 500 of the Act, if he is
not able to, available for, or actively seeking work.
C) Example 3: An individual files for benefits after a layoff.
The weekly benefit amount is $130.00. With respect to the week in question,
the individual is entitled to receive 1 day of holiday pay of $50.00 per day,
an amount which would be treated as wages under Section 2920.35, and 2 days of
vacation pay at $50.00 per day, an amount which would be treated as wages under
Section 2920.30. The individual is ineligible to receive benefits during that
week under this subsection because the entitlement to the sum of $150.00 in
holiday and vacation pay exceeds the weekly benefit amount.
D) Example 4: An individual files for benefits after a layoff.
The weekly benefit amount is $130.00. The individual is entitled to receive
$100.00 in vacation pay treated as wages under Section 2920.30 for that week
and also receives $50.00 in wages for services performed in employment during
that week. The individual's services are for less than full-time work. The
individual is ineligible for benefits for that week under this subsection
because the entitlement to $100.00 in vacation pay plus the receipt of $50.00
in wages for performing services for less than full-time work equals $150.00,
an amount which exceeds the weekly benefit amount.
b) In addition to the ineligibility for benefits imposed by the
provisions of subsection (a), an individual shall be ineligible for benefits
with respect to any week in which he performs full-time work regardless of
whether the amount of wages received during that week equal or exceed the
weekly benefit amount because the individual is not unemployed as required by
Section 239 of the Act.
Example: An individual receives $137.00 in wages for
performing services in full-time work. His weekly benefit amount is $150.00.
The individual is ineligible for benefits under subsection (b) even though the
wages are less than his weekly benefit amount because such individual is
performing full-time work. The individual would also not be eligible for
reduced benefits under Sections 2920.10 and 2920.15.
c) An individual shall be ineligible for benefits with respect to
any week or weeks for which such individual receives any of the following
payments whose aggregate amount is equal to or exceeds his weekly benefit amount.
Mere entitlement to such payments shall not render the individual ineligible
under this subsection.
1) Disqualifying retirement pay under Section 2920.70.
Example: An individual receives a weekly pension of $200.00,
all of which is disqualifying under Section 2920.70. The individual's weekly
benefit amount is $130.00. The individual is ineligible to receive benefits
under this subsection because the receipt of $200.00 in disqualifying
retirement pay exceeds his weekly benefit amount.
2) Workers' compensation paid for temporary disability arising
out of or in connection with employment under the laws of Illinois, of another
state, or of the United States, as defined by Section 606 of the Act.
d) In addition to the ineligibility for benefits imposed by the
provisions of subsections (a), (b), and (c), an individual shall be ineligible
for benefits with respect to any week or weeks in which the aggregate amount of
any payments treated as wages referred to in subsections (a)(1), (2) and (3),
plus any of the disqualifying payments referred to in subsection (c), is equal
to or exceeds such individual's weekly benefit amount.
1) Example 1: An individual receives workers' compensation
payments of $60 per week for temporary disability, and the disability does not
render the individual unable to or unavailable for work. The individual is
also entitled to receive two days of vacation pay at $50 per day with respect
to that week. The individual's vacation pay is treated as wages under Section
2920.30. The individual's weekly benefit amount is $130. This individual is
ineligible for benefits under subsection (d) because the aggregate amount of
the disqualifying payments for that week ($60 + $100 = $160) exceeds his weekly
benefit amount.
2) Example 2: An individual receives $60.00 per week of
retirement pay all of which is disqualifying under Section 2920.70 and is also
entitled to receive 1 day of vacation pay at $50 per day treated as wages under
Section 2920.30 with respect to that week. The individual also receives $65 in
wages for performing less than full-time work during that week. The
individual's weekly benefit amount is $130. Since the aggregate of his
disqualifying retirement pay and his vacation pay ($60 + $50 = $110) is less
than the individual's weekly benefit amount of $130, the individual is not
ineligible for benefits under this subsection. Amounts paid or payable to an
individual as wages for performing services for less than full-time work
referred to in subsection (a)(4) do not make the individual ineligible to
receive benefits in this situation because, when added to the individual's
vacation pay, they do not exceed the individual's weekly benefit amount as
required by subsection (a). Rather these amounts reduce the individual's
benefits in accordance with the formula given in Section 2920.10. Similarly,
since the individual's receipt of $60 in retirement pay is disqualifying but is
not considered wages under Section 611 of the Act, these amounts reduce the
individual's benefits in accordance with the formula given in Section 2920.10,
but do not make the individual entirely ineligible to receive any benefits
under this subsection.
3) Example 3: An individual wins a lottery prize of $1000.
Since lottery prizes are not awarded for services performed by the individual
for an employer, this amount would not constitute disqualifying income under
this Section.