77 Ill. Adm. Code 1110.250
Subacute Care Hospital Model
Section 1110
Section 1110.250
Subacute Care Hospital Model
a) Introduction
1) This
Section contains review criteria that pertain to the subacute care hospital
model category of service. Definitions pertaining to this Subpart are
contained in the Act, in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 and 1130, and in the
Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. The subacute care hospital model
category of service is a demonstration program that is authorized by the
Alternative Health Care Delivery Act. These subacute care hospital model review
criteria are utilized in addition to the applicable review criteria of this Subpart
C and 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1120. This Subpart also contains the methodology the
State Board will utilize in evaluating competing applications, if any, for the
establishment of any subacute care hospital models.
2) A
facility at any time may be caring for subacute patients. A permit must be
obtained to establish a subacute care hospital model. Existing hospitals and
long term care facilities providing subacute care are not required to obtain a
permit,
provided, however, that the facilities shall not hold themselves out
to the public as subacute care hospitals
(Section 15 of the Alternative
Health Care Delivery Act). Establishment of a subacute care hospital model
category of service occurs when a facility holds itself out to the general
public as a subacute care hospital. In these instances, failure to obtain a
permit will result in the application of sanctions as provided for in the
Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act.
3) As
the purpose of the demonstration project is to evaluate the subacute care
hospital model for quality factors, access and the impact on health care costs,
each applicant approved for the category of service will be required to
periodically submit data necessary for evaluating the model's effectiveness.
4) Applications
received for the subacute care hospital model shall be deemed complete upon
receipt by HFSRB. Due to the comparative nature of the subacute care hospital
model review, applicants will not be allowed to amend the application or
provide additional supporting documentation during the review process. The
application as submitted to HFSRB shall serve as the basis for all standard and
prioritization evaluation.
b) Review Criteria
1) Distinct
Unit
The applicant
must document that the proposed unit or health care facility will be primarily
self-contained and physically distinct and will have nursing staff dedicated to
service within only that unit. Auxiliary personnel and contracted professional
personnel must be available for care of unit patients but need not be dedicated
to providing service to only the subacute care hospital model. Documentation
shall include a physical layout of the unit detailing travel patterns to ancillary
and support services and to patient and visitor access and a detailed summary
of all shared services and how costs for those services will be allocated
between the model and the hospital or long term care facility. Also, the
applicant must provide a detailed staffing plan that includes staff
qualifications, staffing patterns for the proposed subacute care hospital and
the manner in which non-dedicated staff services will be provided.
2) Contractual Relationship
The applicant
must document the capability to handle cases of complications, emergencies or
exigent circumstances.
A) An applicant must document, for a model to be located in a
currently licensed long term care facility, the capability through the
existence of a contractual relationship (which includes a transfer agreement)
with a general acute care hospital.
B) An applicant must document, for a model to be located on a
designated site previously licensed as a hospital (see 77 Ill. Adm. Code 740(c)),
capability through the existence of a contractual arrangement (transfer
agreement) with a general acute care hospital.
C) An applicant must document, for a model to be located in a
licensed hospital, that the emergency capability continues to exist in
accordance with the requirements of hospital licensure.
3) Unit Size
The applicant
must document that the number of subacute care beds proposed will equal or
exceed the minimum number established for the planning area. The minimum
subacute care hospital unit size is 10 beds in rural planning areas (as defined
in 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100.720(a)) and 30 beds in all other planning areas.
c) HFSRB Evaluation. HFSRB shall evaluate each application for
the subacute care hospital model category of service based upon compliance with
the conditions set forth in subsections (c)(1), (2) and (3).
1) HFSRB Prioritization of Hospital Applications
A) All hospital applications for each planning area shall be rank
ordered based on points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart B –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) In rural areas an applicant shall be awarded 25 Points if
documentation is provided that the subacute care hospital model will provide
the necessary financial support for the facility to provide continued acute
care services. The documentation shall consist of:
• Factors within the facility or area that will prevent the
facility from complying with the minimum financial ratios established in 77
Ill. Adm. Code 1120 within the next 2 years;
• Historical documentation that the facility has failed to
comply with the minimum financial ratios in each of the last 3 calendar years;
and
• Projected revenue from the subacute hospital care model and
the positive impact of that revenue on the financial position of the applicant
facility. The applicant must explain how the revenue will impact the
facility's financial position, causing the facility to comply with the
financial viability ratios of 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1120. Alternatively,
documentation can be provided showing that projected revenue from the subacute
hospital model will be sufficient to operate the subacute care hospital care
model in compliance with the financial viability ratios of 77 Ill. Adm. Code
1120, or that the applicant facility has entered into a binding agreement with
another institution that guarantees the financial viability of the subacute
hospital care model in accordance with the ratios established in 77 Ill. Adm.
Code 1120 for a period of at least 5 years, regardless of the financial ratios
of the applicant facility.
v) Location in a medically underserved area (as defined by the
Department of Health and Human Services (section 332 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 USC 254E)) as a health professional shortage area) – 3 Points.
vi) A multi-institutional system arrangement exists for the
referral of subacute patients under which the applicant facility serves as the
receiving facility for the system. A multi-institutional system consists of a
network of licensed hospitals and long term care facilities located within the
planning area and within 60 minutes travel time of the applicant that are
interrelated by contractual agreement that provides for an exclusive best
effort arrangement concerning the transfer of patients between facilities.
Best effort arrangement means that the referring facility will encourage and
recommend to its medical staff that patients requiring subacute care will be
transferred only to the applicant facility – 1 Point per each additional
facility in the multi-institutional system, to a maximum of 10 Points.
vii) The existence of Medicare and Medicaid certification at the
applicant facility and historic volume at the applicant facility. The
following point allocation will be applied:
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 10% and 25% of total facility patient days – 2
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 26% and 50% of total facility patient days – 4
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid patient
days exceeded 50% of total facility patient days – 6 Points.
viii) For each of the last 5 calendar years, the applicant facility
documents a case mix consisting of ventilator cases, head trauma cases,
rehabilitation patients including spinal cord injuries, amputees and patients
with orthopaedic problems requiring subacute care, or patients with multiple
complex diagnoses that included physiological monitoring on a continual basis,
of such magnitude that, if placed in the proposed subacute facility, these
patients would have constituted an annual occupancy exceeding 75%. If a
multi-institutional system, as defined in subsection (c)(1)(A)(vi), has an
exclusive best efforts agreement, then each of the cases listed in this
subsection (c)(1)(A)(viii) from such signatory facilities may be counted in
computing the 75% annual occupancy threshold – 5 Points.
ix) The applicant institution has documented that, during the last
calendar year, at least 25% of all patient days of the applicant facility were
reimbursed through contractual relationships with PPOs or HMOs – 3 Points.
x) If the applicant institution, over the last 5 calendar year
period, has been issued a notice of revocation of license from IDPH or has been
decertified from the federal Title XVIII or XIX programs – Loss of 25 Points.
xi) The applicant institution is accredited by The Joint
Commission – 3 Points and 1 additional Point if accreditation is "with
commendation".
xii) Staff support for the subacute care hospital model:
• Full time Medical Director exclusively for the model – 1
Point.
• Physical therapist, 2 full-time equivalents (FTEs) or more –
1 Point.
• Occupational therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
• Speech therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
xiii) In areas where competing applications have been filed, 3
Points will be allocated to the applicant with the lowest positive mean net
margin over the last 3 fiscal years. Each applicant must submit copies of the
audited financial reports of the applicant facility for the latest 3 fiscal
years.
B) Required Point Totals – Hospital Applications
A hospital
application for the development of a subacute care hospital model must obtain a
minimum of 50 Points for approval. The applicant within the planning area
receiving the most points shall be granted the permit for the category of
service if the minimum point total has been exceeded. In the case of tie
scores, HFSRB shall base its decision on considerations relating to location,
scope of service and access.
2) State
Board Prioritization – Long Term Care Facilities
A) All long term care applications for each planning area shall be
rank ordered based on points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart B –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) The applicant has had an Exceptional Care Contract with the
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services for at least 2 years in
the past 4 years – 3 Points.
v) Location in a medically underserved area (as defined by the
federal Department of Health and Human Services (section 332 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 USC 254E)) as a health professional shortage area) – 3
Points.
vi) The existence of Medicare and Medicaid certification at the
applicant facility and historic volume at the facility. The following point
allocation will be applied:
• In the last calendar year or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 10% and 25% of total facility patient days – 3
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days were between 26% and 50% of total facility patient days – 6
Points.
• In the last calendar or fiscal year, Medicare/ Medicaid
patient days exceeded 50% of total facility patient days – 9 Points.
vii) For each of the last 2 calendar years, the applicant
institution documents a casemix consisting of ventilator cases, head trauma
cases, rehabilitation patients including stroke cases, spinal cord injury,
amputees and patients with orthopaedic problems requiring subacute care, or
patients with multiple complex diagnoses that included physiological monitoring
on a continual basis, of such magnitude that, if placed in the proposed
subacute facility, these patients would have constituted an annual occupancy
exceeding 50%. If a multi-institutional system, as defined in subsection (c)(2)(A)(xiii),
has an exclusive best efforts agreement, then each of the cases listed in this
subsection (c)(2)(A)(vii) from the signatory facilities may be counted in
computing the 50% annual occupancy threshold – 5 Points.
viii) The applicant has documented that, during the last calendar
year, at least 20% of all patient days of the applicant facility were
reimbursed through contractual relationships with PPOs or HMOs – 3 Points.
ix) If the applicant, over the last 5 year period, has been issued
a notice of revocation of license from IDPH or decertified from the federal
Title XVIII or XIX programs – Loss of 25 Points.
x) Staff support for the subacute care hospital model:
• Full time Medical Director exclusively for the model – 1
Point.
• Physical therapist, 2 FTEs or more – 1 Point.
• Occupational therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
• Speech therapist, 1 FTE or more – 1 Point.
xi) In areas where competing applications have been filed, 3
Points will be allocated to the application with the lowest positive mean net
margin over the last 3 fiscal years. Each applicant must submit copies of the
audited financial reports of the applicant facility for the latest 3 fiscal
years.
xii) The applicant institution is accredited by the Joint
Commission – 3 Points and 1 additional Point if accreditation is "with
commendation".
xiii) A multi-institutional system arrangement exists for the
referral of subacute patients under which the applicant facility serves as the
receiving facility for the system. A multi-institutional system consists of a
network of licensed hospitals and long term care facilities located within the
planning area and within 60 minutes travel time of the applicant that are interrelated
by contractual agreement that provides for an exclusive best effort arrangement
concerning the transfer of patients between facilities. Best effort
arrangement means the referring facility will encourage and recommend to its
medical staff that patients requiring subacute care will only be transferred to
the applicant facility – 1 Point per each additional facility in the
multi-institutional system to a maximum of 10 Points.
B) A long term care facility's application for the development of a
subacute care hospital model must obtain a minimum of 50 Points for approval.
The applicant within the planning area receiving the most points shall be
granted the permit for the category of service if the minimum point total has
been exceeded. In the case of tie scores, HFSRB shall base its selection on
considerations relating to location, scope of service and access.
3) HFSRB Prioritization of Previously Licensed Hospital
Applications in Chicago
A) All applications for sites previously licensed as hospitals in
Chicago shall be rank ordered based upon points awarded as follows:
i) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of Subpart C –
10 Points.
ii) Compliance with all review criteria of subsection (b) – 10
Points.
iii) Compliance with all applicable review criteria of 77 Ill.
Adm. Code 1120 – 10 Points.
iv) Documentation that the proposed number of beds will be
utilized at an occupancy rate of 75% or more within 2 years after permit
approval. Documentation shall consist of historical subacute caseload from one
or more referral facilities whose subacute caseload, in the future, would be
transferred to the subacute model for care, anticipated caseload from physician
referrals to the unit, and demographic studies projecting the need for subacute
service within the primary market of the proposed subacute hospital care model
– 10 Points.
B) Required Point Totals – Previously Licensed Hospitals
The applicant
within the planning area receiving the most points shall be granted the permit
for the category of service. In the case of tie scores, HFSRB shall base its
selection on considerations relating to location, scope of service and access.
d) Project Completion
1) Since the purpose for establishment of this category of
service is to evaluate the alternative delivery model for effectiveness, these
projects are not complete until the model is evaluated and the decision made to
adopt or not adopt the model as an ongoing licensed level of service separate
from an alternative delivery model. A discontinuation permit will not be
required of a facility holding a subacute care hospital model permit if the
facility elects to discontinue the model but retain licensed subacute care
beds. The subacute care hospital model project shall be considered complete as
of the date IDPH is notified of the discontinuation. If, during the course of
the model evaluation period, an approved provider of the subacute hospital care
model elects to discontinue the category of service, a replacement provider of
the same type may be approved by the State Board. If a need for an additional
subacute care hospital model exists, applications shall be approved in
accordance with subsection (c). Any alteration to the subacute care hospital
model during the life of the permit is subject to State Board review.
2) All assurances and charges for service presented in the
application shall be in effect for the life of the permit unless altered with
the approval of the State Board.
3) A subacute care hospital model shall have 24 months from the
date of permit issuance to become operational. Failure to begin operation in
this time period shall result in the permit becoming null and void.