86 Ill. Adm. Code 1000.100.3420
Apportionment of Business Income of Insurance Companies (IITA Section 304(b))
TITLE 86: REVENUE
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
PART 100 INCOME TAX
SECTION 100.3420 APPORTIONMENT OF BUSINESS INCOME OF INSURANCE COMPANIES (IITA SECTION 304(B))
Section 100.3420 Apportionment of Business Income of
Insurance Companies (IITA Section 304(b))
a) In
General. Except as otherwise provided in this Section,
business income of
an insurance company for a taxable year shall be apportioned to this State by
multiplying such income by a fraction, the numerator of which is the direct
premiums written for insurance upon property or risk in this State, and the
denominator of which is the direct premiums written for insurance upon property
or risk everywhere.
[IITA Section 304(b)(1)]
b) Insurance
Company. For purposes of the IITA, an "insurance company" means any
taxpayer properly treated as an insurance company for purposes of federal
income taxation under subchapter L of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC sections
801 through 848). (See IITA Section 102.) No other taxpayer may be treated as
an insurance company for purposes of the IITA.
c) Direct
Premiums Written.
"Direct premiums written" means the total
amount of direct premiums written, assessments and annuity considerations as
reported for the taxable year on the annual statement filed by the company with
the Illinois Director of Insurance in the form approved by the National
Convention of Insurance Commissioners
(currently known as the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners)
or such other form as may be prescribed in lieu
of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners form.
1) The
apportionment factor shall take into account only those receipts that are
included in either "gross premiums written" under IRC section
832(b)(4)(A) or "gross amount of premiums" under IRC section
803(a)(1)(A). Only receipts that are included in federal taxable income of the
taxpayer, and that are not subtracted in the computation of base income under a
provision of Section 203 of the IITA, may be included in the apportionment
factor. (See Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago
v. Lenckos, 102 Ill.2d 210 (1984).)
2) Only
direct premiums written for insurance, assessments against mutual policyholders
and consideration for annuity contracts that include elements of insurance are
included in the apportionment factor. Other receipts are excluded from the
apportionment factor, even if included in net income.
3) Examples
of receipts that are excluded from the apportionment factor include:
A) Interest,
dividends and other income from investments.
B) Gains
or losses from the adjustment of reserves, salvage or subrogation.
C) Deposit-type
funds. This is due to the fact that deposit-type funds involve no insurance
risk and are therefore reported separately from premiums, assessments and
annuity considerations on the annual report.
D) Premiums
on which State income taxes are prohibited by federal law.
4) Premiums
rebated or repaid to policyholders and reported as negative amounts on the
annual statement are treated as negative amounts in the computation of the
apportionment factor. However, neither the numerator nor the denominator of
the apportionment factor may be reduced below zero.
d) Insurance
on Property or Risk in this State. A direct premium is written for insurance
upon property or risk in this State and included in the numerator of the
apportionment factor if it is allocated to this State in the annual statement filed
by the insurance company with the Director of Insurance. If an insurance
company does not file an annual statement with the Director of Insurance or if
any direct premiums written by an insurance company are not allocated to a
specific state on its annual statement, that insurance company shall include in
the numerator of its apportionment factor the direct premiums written for
insurance on property or risk in this State, determined in accordance with the
determination of gross taxable premium written under Section 409(1) of the
Illinois Insurance Code [215 ILCS 5/409(1)], provided that the determination
shall be made without allowing the exceptions in that Section 409(1) for
premiums on annuities, premiums on which State premium taxes are prohibited by
federal law, premiums paid by the State for Medicaid eligible insureds, premiums
paid for health care services included as an element of tuition charges at any
university or college owned and operated by the State of Illinois, premiums on
group insurance contracts under the State Employees Group Insurance Act of 1971
[5 ILCS 375], or premiums for deferred compensation plans for employees of the
State, units of local government or school districts.
e) Reinsurance.
If the principal source of premiums written by an insurance company consists
of premiums for reinsurance accepted by it, the business income of such company
shall be apportioned to this State by multiplying such income by a fraction,
the numerator of which is the sum of direct premiums written for insurance upon
property or risk in this State, plus premiums written for reinsurance accepted
in respect of property or risk in this State, and the denominator of which is
the sum of direct premiums written for insurance upon property or risk everywhere,
plus premiums written for reinsurance accepted in respect of property or risk
everywhere.
(IITA Section 304(b)(2))
1) The
principal source of premiums written by an insurance company consists of
premiums for reinsurance accepted by the taxpayer for a taxable year if the
premiums written for reinsurance accepted that would be includable in the
denominator of the apportionment fraction for the taxable year under this
subsection (e) exceed the direct premiums written for insurance that would be
includable in the denominator of the apportionment fraction under this
subsection (e).
2) Property
or risk in this State. An insurance company may determine the amount of
premiums
written for reinsurance accepted in respect of property or risk in this State
by consideration of each premium written, or the premiums
may, at the
election of the company, be determined on the basis of:
A)
the
proportion which premiums written for reinsurance accepted from companies
commercially domiciled in Illinois bears to premiums written for reinsurance
accepted from all sources
;
or
B)
the
proportion which the sum of the direct premiums written for insurance upon
property or risk in this State by each ceding company from which reinsurance is
accepted bears to the sum of the total direct premiums written by each such
ceding company for the taxable year.
3) The
election to determine the portion of reinsurance premiums accepted in respect
of property or risk in this State for a particular tax year, by consideration
of each premium written or by either of the alternative methods outlined in
subsection (e)(2), shall be made by using the chosen method on the taxpayer's
return for the taxable year. For taxable years ending prior to December 31,
2011, the election may be made or changed at any time.
The election made by
a company for its first taxable year ending on or after December 31, 2011 is
binding for that company for that taxable year and for all subsequent taxable
years, and may be altered only with the written permission of the Department,
which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(IITA Section 304(b)(2))
A) A
request for permission to alter an election shall be submitted to the
Department as a request for a private letter ruling under 2 Ill. Adm. Code
1200.110, and permission to alter an election shall be granted by private
letter ruling. Requests may be made for the change to take effect for a taxable
year ending prior to the date the request is filed, provided that the request
shall be granted only if the statute of limitations for assessment of
additional tax is open for that taxable year and every subsequent taxable year
as of the date the Department responds to the request. The taxpayer and the
Department may agree in writing to extend the statute of limitations under IITA
Section 905(f) in order to allow the Department time to process the request.
B) If
permission to alter an election is denied, the taxpayer may challenge the
denial by filing its return for each taxable year to which the requested
alteration was to apply and for which a return has not been filed, using the
previously-elected method, and:
i) paying
the excess of its tax liability shown on the return over the liability that
would be shown using the requested method under protest pursuant to Section
2a.1 of the State Officers and Employees Money Disposition Act [30 ILCS
230/2a.1] and filing a complaint as provided in that Act; or
ii) by
filing a refund claim for that taxable year and any subsequent year for which a
return has been filed, using the method requested and filing a protest with the
Department or a petition with the Illinois Independent Tax Tribunal in response
to a denial of the claim.