86 Ill. Adm. Code 130.1960
Finance Companies and Other Lending Agencies – Installment Contracts – Bad Debts
Section 130
Section 130.1960 Finance
Companies and Other Lending Agencies – Installment Contracts – Bad Debts
a) Lending Agencies – When Liable For Tax
Finance
companies and other lending agencies are not relieved from liability for tax in
cases in which they engage in the business of selling to users or consumers
tangible personal property to which they hold or acquire title. Except as
provided in subsection (b), when a lending agency transfers title to a
repossessed car to a user, the lending agency is engaging in the business of
selling tangible personal property at retail and incurs Retailers' Occupation
Tax (ROT) liability on its receipts from those sales. It shall be registered
as a retailer under the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act and shall file returns
and otherwise comply with that Act.
b) Lending Agencies – When Not Liable For Tax
1) Finance companies and other lending agencies are engaged primarily
in the business of financing or acquiring the promissory notes given by
purchasers of automobiles, furniture, refrigerators or other items of tangible
personal property.
2) To guarantee payment of these promissory notes, lending
agencies sometimes take as security chattel mortgages upon the tangible
personal property. When the purchaser of the automobile or other tangible
personal property fails to meet its obligation, the lending agency repossesses
the property and sells it to satisfy the obligation evidenced by the notes. In
connection with these sales, the lending agency acts as agent for the owner of
the repossessed property if the owner is known or disclosed to the purchaser
and if the lending agency does not take title to the property; the lending
agency, under these circumstances, is not liable for payment of any ROT with
respect to the proceeds from these sales.
3) Even if the lending agency does title a repossessed motor
vehicle in its name, if the original buyer, after the expiration of the
redemption period provided for in the Retail Installment Sales Act [815 ILCS
405], is granted permission to redeem and to resume possession of the vehicle
and to continue performance under the buyer's original installment contract
without any change in the terms of the contract, and the lending agency
re-endorses the repossession title to the original buyer, the transaction is
not regarded as a sale and so is not taxable.
c) Installment Sales
1) When a retailer of tangible personal property sells an
installment contract or "paper" to a third party, the difference
between the selling price of the tangible personal property and the selling
price of the installment contract or "paper" is a cost of doing
business and is therefore not deductible in computing ROT liability. ROT is
measured by the total selling price of the tangible personal property purchased
from the retailer for use or consumption. Upon sale of the installment
contract or "paper" to a third party, ROT becomes due based on the
entire selling price to the purchaser of the tangible personal property, with
credit allowed for any tax already remitted to the Department based on the
receipts from the sale of the tangible personal property. As an illustration,
a computer vendor enters into an installment sales contract with a business for
a computer system. The selling price of the computer system is $120,000 and
the contract requires monthly installment payments of $10,000 for one year.
After the business makes the first payment, the computer vendor sells the
installment contract to a bank for $90,000. Upon the sale of the installment
contract to the bank, the computer vendor incurs ROT on $120,000 (the entire
selling price to the original purchaser), with credit allowed for the tax that was
remitted on the first $10,000 payment made by the business.
2) For purposes of this Section, "paper" means any
instrument of indebtedness that was acquired by the retailer from the purchaser
of the tangible personal property. Sales of "paper" to a third party
includes the sale of accounts receivable as well as assignments or sales of the
actual instruments of indebtedness themselves.
d) Bad Debts
1) Definitions. For purposes of this
subsection (d):
A) "Bad debt" means any portion of a debt arising
from a taxable sale at retail that is:
i)
found to be worthless
or uncollectible;
ii) has been charged off
in
the retailer's or lender's books and records;
and
iii)
has, except as provided in subsections
(d)(2)(F) and (G), been claimed as a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code, U.S. Code: Title 26. For information on calculation of the bad debt
deduction
see
subsection
(d)(4)
.
B) "
Retailer" means a person
who holds
itself
out as being engaged (or who habitually engages) in
selling tangible personal property at retail with respect to such sales and
includes a retailer's affiliates.
C) "
Lender" means a person,
or an affiliate, assignee, or transferee of that person, who owns or has owned
a private-label credit card account or an interest in a private-label credit
card receivable that the person purchased directly from a retailer who remitted
the tax imposed under the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act; originated pursuant to
that person's contract with the retailer who remitted the tax imposed under the
Retailers' Occupation Tax Act; or acquired from a third party.
D) "
Private-label Credit
Card" means a charge card or credit card that carries, refers to, or is
branded with the name or logo of a retailer and may only be used to make
purchases from that retailer or that retailer's affiliates.
E) "
Affiliate" means an
entity affiliated under section 1504 of the Internal Revenue Code, or an entity
that would be an affiliate under that section had the entity been a
corporation.
[35 ILCS 120/6d]
2) Bad Debt Claimed by Retailers
A) In case a retailer repossesses any tangible personal property
and subsequently resells that property to a purchaser for use or consumption,
the retailer's
gross receipts from that sale are
subject to ROT. The retailer is entitled to a bad debt credit with respect to
the original sale in which the default has occurred to the extent to which it
has paid ROT on a portion of the price that the retailer does not collect, or
that the retailer is not permitted to retain because of being required to make
a repayment of that portion to a lending agency under a "with
recourse" agreement.
B) Retailers of tangible personal property other than motor
vehicles, watercraft, trailers and aircraft that must be registered with an
agency of this State may obtain this bad debt credit by taking a deduction on
the returns they file with the Department for the month in which the federal
income tax return or amended federal income tax return on which the receivable
is written off is filed, or by filing a claim for credit as provided in
subsection (d)(2)(E).
C) Because retailers of motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers and
aircraft do not pay ROT to the Department on retail sales of motor vehicles,
watercraft, trailers and aircraft with monthly returns, but remit the tax to
the Department on a transaction by transaction basis, they are unable to take a
deduction on the returns that they file with the Department, but may file a
claim for credit with the Department, as provided in subsections (d)(2)(E),
(F), (G) and (d)(5)(B)
on any transaction with
respect to which they desire to receive the benefit of the repossession credit.
D) Retailers who incur bad debt on any tangible personal property
that is not repossessed may also obtain bad debt credit as provided in
subsections (d)(2)(A), (E)
, (F) and (G)
.
E) In the case of tax paid on an account receivable that becomes a
bad debt, the tax paid becomes a tax paid in error, for which a claim for
credit may be filed in accordance with Section 6 of the Retailers' Occupation
Tax Act, on the date that the federal income tax return or amended return on
which the receivable,
including as provided in
subsections (d)(2)(F) and (G),
is written off is filed.
F)
Ordinarily,
a deduction for uncollectible debts is allowed only for a retailer who uses the
gross sales (accrual) method of accounting to keep its books and records and to
file its federal income tax and sales and use tax returns. However, in the
limited situation in which a cash basis retailer
has prepaid the tax, such retailer is allowed to claim a bad debt
deduction if the debt:
i) has been found to be worthless or
uncollectible; and
ii) would be eligible to be both
charged off in the retailer's books and records
and
claimed as a deduction under the Internal Revenue Code if the retailer had kept
accounts on an accrual basis.
G) Likewise, retailers who use the gross sales
method for filing their sales tax returns, but who file their income tax
returns on a cash basis are allowed to claim a bad debt deduction if the debt:
i) has been found to be worthless or
uncollectible; and
ii) has been charged off in the retailer's books
and records and would be eligible to be claimed as a deduction under the
Internal Revenue Code on the income tax return filed by the retailer if its
income tax return was not filed on the cash basis.
EXAMPLE:
ABC
Auto Inc.
reports
on the cash method of accounting and is in the business of making retail sales
of automobiles. On occasion,
ABC Auto Inc
. will
itself finance sales for some of its customers and pay the full amount of sales
tax upfront so that its customers can obtain license plates. In 2020, ABC Auto
Inc. financed a sale to a customer and paid the sales tax upfront. The
customer never made a payment, and in 2021 the debt was found to be worthless.
If
ABC Auto Inc.
reported on the accrual method,
the debt would be eligible to be both charged off as a bad debt in the
retailer's books and records and claimed as a deduction
pursuant
to the Internal Revenue Code
. Therefore, ABC Auto Inc. can file a claim
for the sales taxes it paid out-of-pocket to the Department. For purposes of
filing a claim with the Department, the bad debt will be considered claimed as
a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code on the 2021 income tax return
filed by
ABC Auto Inc.
H)
For
information on claiming a deduction or refund for tax previously paid, see
subsection (d)(5)
.
3) Private-label Credit Cards – Bad Debt
on and after July 31, 2015
A) On and after July 31, 2015,
with
respect to the payment of taxes on purchases made through a private-label
credit card, if consumer accounts or receivables are found to be worthless or
uncollectible, the retailer may claim a deduction on a return in an amount
equal to, or may obtain a refund of, the tax remitted by the retailer on the
unpaid balance due if:
i)
the accounts or receivables have
been charged off as bad debt on the lender's books and records on or after
January 1, 2016;
ii)
the accounts or receivables have
been claimed as a deduction pursuant to Section 166 of the Internal Revenue
Code on the federal income tax return filed by the lender; and
iii)
a deduction was not previously
claimed and a refund was not previously allowed on that portion of the account
receivable.
B) The deduction or refund allowed under
subsection (d)(3)(A):
i)
does not apply to credit sale
transaction amounts resulting from purchases of titled property;
ii)
includes only those credit sale
transaction amounts that represent purchases from the retailer whose name or
logo appears on the private-label credit card used to make those purchases;
iii)
may only be taken by the taxpayer,
or its successors, that filed the return and remitted tax on the original sale
on which the deduction or refund claim is based; and
iv)
includes all credit sale
transaction amounts eligible under
subsection (d)(3)(B)(ii)
that are
outstanding with respect to the specific private-label credit card account or
receivable at the time the account or receivable is charged off, regardless of
the date the credit sale transaction actually occurred.
4) Bad Debt Calculation
A) If the amount of an account found to be worthless
is comprised in part of nontaxable receipts, such as interest, insurance, and
other charges exempt from sales or use tax, and in part of taxable receipts
upon which tax has been paid, a bad debt deduction may be claimed only with
respect to the unpaid amount upon which tax has been paid.
B) Accounts found to be worthless include
receivables written off as uncollectible
by a retailer
or lender
who uses the bad debt reserve method or allowance for doubtful
account method of recognizing bad debt expenses pursuant to the Internal
Revenue Code.
C) No deduction is allowed for expenses incurred in
attempting to enforce collection of any account receivable, or repossession
expenses.
D) No deduction is allowed for payments of late
fees, and other penalty charges that occur when customers do not comply with
the terms of the sales contract.
E) The fair market value of repossessed property is
not factored into a bad debt calculation.
F)
For purposes of computing the deduction or refund, payments
on the accounts or receivables shall be prorated against the amounts outstanding
on the accounts or receivables
. For
information on claiming a deduction or refund using an alternative method, see
subsection (d)(4)(G).
i) For revolving credit loans involving private
label credit cards, retailers may calculate the uncollectible taxable amount by
applying the percentage of charges that went to taxable purchases to the
outstanding balance on the account.
Example:
ABC Retailer Inc. allows customers to finance purchases using a private label
credit card. During the time the card was active, the customer had the
following charges added to the customer's account:
Charge
Amount
Percentage
Taxable
Merchandise:
$10,000
87.7%
IL State and local sales taxes:
$800
7.0%
Interest
fees:
$500
4.4%
Late
fees:
$100
0.9%
Total:
$11,400
The
outstanding balance at the time of the charge off was $1,000. Applying the
87.7% merchandise proration percentage to the $1,000 charge off amount results
in an uncollectible taxable amount of $877. (The merchandise proration
percentage is calculated by dividing the charge item amount by the total charge
amount).
ii) For installment loans, the formula for
calculating the uncollectible taxable amount is the unpaid balance when the
receivable is charged off divided by the total amount of the finance contract
multiplied by the taxable amount financed.
Example:
XYZ Auto Inc. sells an automobile for $20,000. The tax due on the sale at 6.25%
is $1,250. The customer makes a $1,000 down payment and finances the remaining
amount of the purchase price plus the sales taxes through XYZ Auto Inc. The
applicable loan details are as follows:
Total Amount Financed:
$20,250
Taxable Amount Financed:
$19,000
Total Interest Payments:
$10,000
Total Finance Contract:
$30,250
The
customer makes $5,000 in payments but then stops paying with the unpaid balance
of the total finance contract being $25,250. ($30,250 - $5,000). XYZ Auto
Inc. determines the loan is uncollectible. The uncollectible taxable amount is
calculated as follows:
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
=
(unpaid balance when charged off
/ total amount of the finance contract) x taxable amount financed
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
=
$25,250/$30,250 x $19,000
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
=
$15,860
G) The Department may allow an alternative method of
substantiating the deduction or refund where the volume and character of the
uncollectible accounts would warrant use of alternative computations and the
Department finds that, subject to the provisions of this Section, the method
used fairly and equitably
i) prorates the taxable and nontaxable elements of
a bad debt; and
ii) computes the amount of sales tax imposed and
remitted with respect to the taxable charges remaining unpaid on the bad debt.
H) In situations where
the books and records of the retailer or lender support an allocation of the
bad debt allowance among multiple states, an allocation of the bad debt is
allowed between Illinois and the other state or states.
5) Bad Debt Procedural Requirements –
Record Keeping – Limitations
A) Retailers of tangible personal property other
than motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers, and aircraft that must be registered
with an agency of this State may obtain this bad debt credit by taking a
deduction on the returns they file with the Department for the month in which
the federal income tax return or amended federal income tax return on which the
receivable is written off is filed.
Failure to take
the deduction on the proper return will not in itself prevent the allowance of
a deduction or refund provided an amended return for that month or claim for
refund is filed with the Department within the statute of limitations as
provided in subsections (d)(2)(A) and (B).
i) When a retailer who uses the
bad debt reserve or allowance for doubtful account method
of recognizing bad debt expenses takes a deduction on the federal income tax
return prior to writing off the receivable in its books and records, the
retailer may take a deduction on the return filed with the Department for the
month in which the federal income tax return or amended federal income tax
return covering the period in which the receivable is written off in its books
and records is filed.
ii) If the bad debt deduction exceeds the amount of
the taxable sales on the Form ST-1 return for the period in which the
retailer's federal income tax return is filed or amended, the taxpayer is
allowed to carry forward the unclaimed portion of the bad debt deduction and
apply it to succeeding Form ST-1 returns until it has been deducted in its
entirety.
iii) Any amount of a bad debt deduction taken that
is subsequently collected by the retailer, in whole or part, shall be included
in the first return filed after the collection, and the tax shall be paid with
the return.
B) Because retailers of motor vehicles, watercraft, aircraft,
and trailers do not pay Retailers' Occupation Tax to the Department on retail
sales of motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers and aircraft with monthly
returns, but remit the tax to the Department on a transaction-by-transaction
basis, they are unable to take a deduction on the returns that they file with
the Department but instead may file a claim for credit with the Department, as
provided in Section 6 of the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act, using Form ST-557,
available at https://tax.illinois.gov/.
C)
The retailer and lender shall
maintain adequate books, records or other documentation supporting the charge
off of the accounts or receivables for which a deduction was taken or a refund
was claimed under Sections 6 or 6d of the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act,
including,
but not limited to, a copy of that part of the federal return on which the
deduction was claimed
, including any
supporting statements or schedules
.
D) If a retailer or lender does not charge
off an account receivable that is found to be worthless or uncollectible as a
bad debt in its books and records and does not claim a deduction pursuant to
the Internal Revenue Code on its federal income tax return or amended return,
or, for cash basis retailers, the account receivable would
not be eligible to be claimed as a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code on its federal income tax return or amended return if the retailer or
lender filed a federal income tax return on an accrual basis,
the tax paid on that bad debt or receivable will
not be considered a tax paid in error. Thus, the retailer will not be able to
file a deduction or claim for credit in accordance with Sections 6 or 6d of the
Retailers' Occupation Tax Act.
E)
For purposes of the deduction or
refund allowable under Section 6d of the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act, the
limitations period for claiming the deduction or refund shall be the same as
the limitations period set forth in Section 6 of the Retailers' Occupation Tax
Act for filing a claim for credit, and shall commence on the date that the
accounts or receivables have been claimed as a bad debt deduction pursuant to
section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code on the federal income tax return filed
by the lender, regardless of the date on which the sale of the tangible
personal property actually occurred.
[35 ILCS 120/6d].