89 Ill. Adm. Code 336.105
The Administrative Appeal Hearing
Section 336.105 The Administrative Appeal Hearing
The administrative appeal hearing shall consist of a
pre-hearing conference and a hearing date during which testimony is taken and
evidence is received. The appellant or the appellant's authorized
representative shall be prepared to participate at all pre-hearing conferences
and hearings. Hearings shall be recorded; however, any party wishing to have
the proceedings recorded by a certified court reporter may do so at the party's
own expense.
a) Pre-Hearing
Conference
The pre-hearing conference shall
be convened by telephone unless the ALJ and the parties agree that the
pre-hearing conference shall be held in person. The ALJ shall place all
telephone calls. The cost of telephone calls will be borne by the Department.
The AHU shall arrange for the appellant to use a telephone at a Department
Field Office if the appellant has previously notified the Department that
he/she does not have access to a telephone.
1) At
the pre-hearing conference, the ALJ shall provide the parties with standard
admonishments that shall include a statement of the rights of the parties and
the right to have a timely hearing within the applicable timeframe, as well as
the setting of dates for the administrative appeal hearing.
2) During
the pre-hearing conference, the appellant and the Department should be prepared
to discuss:
A) potential witnesses;
B) exhibits that might be
offered;
C) timeframes for the
administrative appeal hearing;
D) any potential motions that
could be filed;
E) any
other issues that would impact the timing and length of the administrative
appeal hearing, such as, but not limited to, whether any of the witnesses
require a special accommodation or a translator; and
F) The Department's
legal representative and the appellant and his or her representative have an
affirmative duty to determine if there is, and to report to the ALJ before any
hearing is scheduled, any pending criminal case or juvenile court case
concerning the circumstances that gave rise to the indicated report.
b) The ALJ shall address
the following issues during the pre-hearing conference:
1) If
the appellant asserts, at the pre-hearing conference, that he or she is a child
care worker who was not afforded an Administrator's Teleconference during the
child abuse and neglect investigation (see 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300 (Reports of
Child Abuse and Neglect)), the appellant may request a review of the
investigation. The ALJ may request documentation to validate the child care
worker status of the appellant. The review shall be conducted jointly by the
Division of Child Protection and the Office of Legal Services and shall
determine if the case should be unfounded or if a hearing date will be set.
The review must be conducted within 14 days from the date of the pre-hearing
conference in which the appellant claims he or she is a child care worker who
was not afforded an Administrator's Teleconference during the child abuse and
neglect determination. Any time expended for the review process will be
attributed to the appellant and not to the Department (see Section
336.220(a)(1) or (2)).
2) Whether
parties have exchanged lists of the names of persons who may provide testimony
during the administrative hearing.
3) Whether
children may testify or be involved in the hearing.
A) Either
party requesting that a child be subpoenaed to testify or be involved in the
hearing process must demonstrate at the pre-hearing conference that:
i) the
child's testimony or involvement is essential to a determination of an issue on
appeal;
ii) the
likelihood of inflicting emotional harm to the particular child involved can be
minimized with conditions and restrictions and the child's testimony is
necessary for the interests of justice; and
iii) no
alternatives, such as stipulations or transcripts from prior court hearings,
exist that may be used as a substitute for the child's testimony.
B) In
determining whether a child will testify, the ALJ must consider, when
available, the opinion of the child's treating clinician regarding the impact
on the child if the child is permitted to testify or not permitted to testify,
and how any negative impact could best be minimized for the particular child.
i) The
ALJ must balance the hardship on the child, taking into account possible
restrictions or modifications described in subsection (c)(3)(B)(ii), against
the interests of justice and the harm to the child if an appeal is improperly denied
or an indicated finding is improperly expunged.
ii) If
an ALJ allows a child to testify, the ALJ may set any conditions or
restrictions, and may use any techniques allowed in any juvenile, civil or
criminal court (including but not limited to in camera interviews, video
conferences, questions submitted in writing, exclusion of parties to the
proceeding (including but not limited to the parents), or change of hearing
room or location) that will help minimize any emotional impact on the child.
4) Whether:
A) the
parties agree to hold the hearing by telephone or video conference;
B) whether
witnesses should be scheduled to testify at specific times;
C) there
are any witnesses, such as medical professionals, that should be permitted to
testify telephonically; and
D) whether
there are any non-professional witnesses who should be allowed to testify telephonically.
5) Whether
the parties have or will have exchanged records or documents prior to the
administrative hearing.
6) Whether
the parties can agree upon any facts as true.
7) Motions
Filed by Any Party
A) Any
motions from the appellant or the Department shall be filed with the ALJ and
served upon the AHU and the opposing party within a reasonable time prior to
the hearing.
B) Any
motion that is consistent with administrative practice and procedure and does
not infringe upon the Director's authority may be heard.
C) Motions
filed shall be filed in accordance with any motion practice and timelines
established by the ALJ responsible for hearing the case.
D) If
any party believes that a finding in a juvenile court proceeding is dispositive
to an issue on a pending administrative appeal, he or she may file a motion,
with supporting documentation, requesting the appropriate relief.
8) The
need of either party for an interpreter in his/her preferred language or for
communication assistance.
9) Whether
any juvenile or criminal cases related to the indicated finding on appeal are
pending in circuit court. If the ALJ discovers during the pre-hearing
conference that there is a pending juvenile or criminal case arising from the
same set of facts as the indicated finding, the appeal will be dismissal as premature.
The perpetrator shall be informed orally that, within 60 days after the
conclusion of any criminal court action in the circuit court, or after
adjudication in any juvenile court action concerning the circumstances that
give rise to an indicated report, he or she may again file a request, except
that there shall be no such right to a hearing on the ground of the report's
inaccuracy if there has been a court finding of child abuse or neglect or a
criminal finding of guilt as to the perpetrator. The dismissal order shall
also state that the perpetrator may file an administrative appeal within 60
days after the conclusion of the criminal court action in circuit court or
after adjudication in any juvenile court action, except that there shall be no
right to an administrative appeal if there has been a court finding of child abuse
or neglect or a criminal finding of guilt as to the perpetrator.
10) Upon
notification from the Department's legal representative or the perpetrator that
a criminal or juvenile court action is pending, based on the same facts or
circumstances as the administrative expungement appeal, the appeal will be
dismissed as premature. The dismissal order shall state that the perpetrator
may file an administrative appeal within 60 days after the conclusion of the
criminal court action in circuit court or after adjudication in any juvenile
court action, except that there shall be no right to an administrative appeal
if there has been a court finding of child abuse or neglect or a criminal
finding of guilt as to the perpetrator.