2025-22
Kansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2025-22
Cite as Kan. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 2025-22
September 18, 2025
ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2025-22
The Honorable Vicki Schmidt
Kansas Insurance Commissioner
Kansas Department of Insurance
1300 SW Arrowhead Road
Topeka, Kansas 66604
Re:
Insurance—Public Adjusters Licensing Act—Definitions
Insurance—Public Adjusters Licensing Act—License Required;
Limitations; Exceptions
Synopsis:
The Public Adjusters Licensing Act defines public adjusting only in the
context of helping to settle first-party claims under commercial lines
insurance contracts. Because the Act has a narrow focus and does not
prohibit public adjusting for claims under other types of insurance
contracts, the Act neither regulates nor prohibits public adjusting for
claims arising under residential lines insurance contracts. Cited
herein: K.S.A. 40-5502; 40-5503.
*
*
*
Dear Commissioner Schmidt:
As Kansas Insurance Commissioner, you ask whether the Public Adjusters
Licensing Act prohibits residential public adjusting, or whether this practice is
unregulated by the Act.1 Public adjusters, generally speaking, are hired by
policyholders (as opposed to insurance companies) to assist them in the claims
1 K.S.A. 40-5501 et seq.
Hon. Vicki Schmidt
Page 2
settlement process.2 Although the general practice of public adjusting is not
necessarily limited to certain types of insurance policies, the Act only addresses
public adjusting for first-party claims under “commercial lines insurance
contracts.”3 As explained below, our analysis concludes that the Act neither
prohibits nor regulates public adjusting for residential lines insurance contracts.
Your question turns on statutory interpretation. In this exercise, we look to the
“plain and unambiguous” meaning of the relevant statutes.4 We can neither
“speculate” nor “read into the statute[s] language not readily found there.”5
Statutory interpretation must strive, “as far as practicable, to reconcile the different
[statutory] provisions [of the Act] so as to make them consistent, harmonious, and
sensible.”6
In 2009, the Kansas Legislature passed the Act to “govern the qualifications and
procedures for the licensing of public adjusters” and to “specif[y] the duties of and
restrictions on public adjusters.”7 In other words, the Act, as its name suggests, is a
licensing law. K.S.A. 40-5502(l) provides:
“Public adjuster” means any individual who:
(1) For compensation or any other thing of value, and solely in relation
to first party claims arising under insurance claims or contracts that
insure the real or personal property of the insured, aids or acts on
behalf of an insured in negotiating for, or effecting the settlement of, a
claim for loss or damage covered by and limited to commercial lines
insurance contracts;
(2) advertises for employment as a public adjuster of insurance claims
or directly or indirectly solicits business or represents to the public
that such person is a public adjuster of first party insurance claims for
losses or damages to real or personal property covered by and limited
to commercial lines insurance contracts; or
(3) for compensation or any other thing of value, investigates or adjusts
losses or advises an insured about first party claims for losses or
damages to real or personal property of the insured covered by and
2 See 46A C.J.S. Insurance § 1883 (May 2025 update) (“Public adjusters are hired to assist in
presenting a claim to an insurance company and to assist in any dispute that might arise.”); cf.
K.S.A. 40-5514(f)(2) (discussing respective roles of company, independent, and public adjustors).
3 K.S.A. 40-5502(l)(1); see also K.S.A. 40-5502(l)(2), (3) (materially similar).
4 In re Est. of Strader, 301 Kan. 50, 55, 339 P.3d 769 (2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
5 Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
6 In re Marriage of Ross, 245 Kan. 591, 584, 783 P.2d 331 (1989).
7 K.S.A. 40-5501.
Hon. Vicki Schmidt
Page 3
limited to commercial lines insurance contracts, for another person
engaged in the business of adjusting losses or damages covered by and
limited to commercial lines insurance contracts.8
K.S.A. 40-5503(a) mandates that “[a] person shall not act as or represent that such
person is a public adjuster in this state unless the person is an individual licensed
as a public adjuster in accordance with this act.” In other words, unlicensed
individuals may not aid or act on behalf of insureds in seeking to settle first-party
claims under commercial lines insurance contracts.
Together, K.S.A. 40-5502(l) and K.S.A. 40-5503(a) establish that the Act is limited
to licensing and regulating public adjusting only for first-party claims arising under
commercial lines insurance contracts. The plaint text of the Act provides that it is a
limited licensing regulation targeting a certain type of public adjusting. There is no
corresponding prohibition against, nor any references to, public adjusting outside
commercial lines insurance contracts. There also is not any provision or indication
that the Legislature intended to prohibit public adjusting for all types of claims
except for first-party claims under commercial lines insurance contracts.
Accordingly, it would be inappropriate to read such a prohibition into the Act.9
Therefore, the Act does not address, and does not prohibit, residential public
adjusting.
We note that K.S.A. 40-5503(c) provides certain instances when “a license as a
public adjuster shall not be required.” And some of the exceptions are not
necessarily confined to instances where insureds seek assistance with first-party
claims under commercial lines insurance contracts.10 Arguably, this could indicate
that the Act prohibits public adjusting outside the narrow, licensed exception. But
given K.S.A. 40-5502(l)’s narrow focus and the lack of any prohibition on public
adjusting in other contexts, we believe this argument isolates and puts too much
weight on the exceptions, resulting in a strained interpretation of the Act.11 If the
exceptions are broader than necessary, the Legislature may have “employed a belt
and suspenders approach” to ensure certain practices are not accidentally caught up
in the Act.12
8 (emphases added).
9 See In re Est. of Strader, 301 Kan. at 55.
10 K.S.A. 40-5503(c).
11 See State v. Wilson, 267 Kan. 550, 557, 987 P.2d 1060 (1999) (recognizing “that courts will not give
strained meanings to legislative language through a process of imaginative hypothesizing; a
common-sense interpretation of the statute is the guiding principle”).
12 See Atl. Richfield Co. v. Christian, 590 U.S. 1, 14 n.5 (2020); cf. Rimini St., Inc. v. Oracle USA,
Inc., 586 U.S. 334, 346 (2019) (“Sometimes the better overall reading of the statute contains some
redundancy.”).
Hon. Vicki Schmidt
Page 4
In conclusion, the Act neither regulates nor prohibits public adjusting for claims
under residential lines insurance contracts. We note, however, that public adjusting
outside the Act is not wholly unrestrained. Public adjusting, whether under the Act
or not, cannot cross over into the unauthorized practice of law, and public adjusters
are subject to liability under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act if they engage in
unlawful conduct toward consumers.13
Sincerely,
/s/ Kris W. Kobach
Kris W. Kobach
Attorney General
/s/ Adam T. Steinhilber
Adam T. Steinhilber
Assistant Solicitor General
13 See generally State ex rel. Stovall v. Martinez, 27 Kan. App. 2d 9, 996 P.2d 371 (2000).