KY Insurance Advisory Opinion 2021-03
AO 2021-0003 Implementation of 21 SB 44
PUBLIC PROTECTION CABINET
Andy Beshear
Department of Insurance
Ray A. Perry
Governor
P.O. Box 517
Secretary
Frankfort, Kentucky 40602-0517
1-800-595-6053
Sharon P. Clark
http://insurance.ky.gov
Commissioner
ppc.ky.gov
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY
ADVISORY OPINION
2021-0003
The following Advisory Opinion is to advise the reader of the current position of the Kentucky
Department of Insurance (the “Department”) on the specified issue. The Advisory Opinion is
not legally binding on either the Department or the reader.
TO:
ALL HEALTH INSURERS AUTHORIZED TO OFFER HEALTH BENEFIT
PLANS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
FROM:
SHARON P. CLARK, COMMISSIONER
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
RE:
IMPLEMENTATION OF 21 SB 44
DATE:
August 25, 2021
* * * * * * *
This Advisory Opinion is intended to provide guidance on the implementation of 21 RS SB 44,
An Act relating to access to health care. This Act requires insurers to accept premium and costsharing payments made on behalf of an insured from:
• A state or federal government program, including payments made by programs operating
in accordance with title XXVI of the federal Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. sec.
300ff et seq., as amended
• An Indian tribe, tribal organization, or urban Indian organization; and
• A program conducted by an organization that certifies that the organization is:
o Exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. sec 502(a), as amended;
o Described in 26 U.S.C. sec 170(b)(1)(A)(i) or (vi); and
o Operating in compliance with applicable federal laws, including the False Claims
Act, 31 U.S.C. secs. 3720 to 3722.
Under section 1(4)(b) of the Act, the Act does not require insurers to accept payments made by,
or on behalf of, any organization that receives funding in any form from a health care provider,
as defined in KRS 304.17A-005, which includes the following:
• Advanced practice registered nurse licensed under KRS Chapter 314;
• Chiropractor licensed under KRS Chapter 312;
• Dentist licensed under KRS Chapter 313;
• Facility or service required to be licensed under KRS Chapter 216B;
• Home medical equipment and services provider licensed under KRS Chapter
• 309;
• Optometrist licensed under KRS Chapter 320;
• Pharmacist licensed under KRS Chapter 315;
• Physician, osteopath, or podiatrist licensed under KRS Chapter 311;
• Physician assistant regulated under KRS Chapter 311; and
• Other health care practitioners as determined by the department by administrative
regulations promulgated under KRS Chapter 13A.1
Based on legislative testimony, the language in Section 1(4)(b) is intended to be a narrow
exemption that would prohibit a non-profit organization that is affiliated with a health care
provider from providing premium or cost-sharing assistance to an insured that it also serves as a
patient. Further, based on discussions with the proponents of the amendment, this language was
intended to prevent health care providers who can submit claims under a health benefit plan from
paying the premiums for the health plan.
In considering the implementation of the exemption in Section 1(4)(b) of SB 44, the Department
has reviewed guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of
Inspector General regarding the operation of independent charity patient assistance programs.
On May 30, 2014, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector
General’s Supplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity Patient Assistance
Programs was published in the Federal Register at 79 FR 31120. While this advisory relates to
patient assistance programs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, it sets forth guiding
principles for patient assistance programs operated by independent charities that provide cost
sharing assistance for prescription drugs to assist patient assistance programs in avoiding
activities that could be considered a violation of the federal anti-kickback law. The federal law
makes it a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive any
1 The Department has filed 806 KAR 17:580 which proposed to add pharmacies to the list of providers
remuneration to induce or reward the referral or generation of business reimbursable by any
federal health care program. [1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act, 42 CFR 1003.101]
Under the federal anti-kickback law, “remuneration” includes the transfer of anything of value,
directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind. Based on the 2014 Special Advisory
Bulletin, the federal anti-kickback law is interpreted to cover any arrangement where one
purpose of the remuneration is to give or obtain money for the referral of services or to induce
further referrals. Civil penalties can be imposed against any person that offers or transfers
remuneration to a beneficiary that the benefactor knows or should know is likely to influence the
beneficiary to order or receive from a particular provider, practitioner, or supplier any item or
service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, by Medicare or a state health care
program. A violation determination requires an individualized evaluation of all of the relevant
facts and circumstances, including the parties’ intent. Relevant factors for the analysis are the
nature, structure, sponsorship, and funding of the particular patient assistance program.
Based on the Department’s understanding of the legislative intent of SB 44 Section 1(4)(b), a
similar prohibition against inappropriate remuneration to entities identified in Section 1(2)(c)
was envisioned. Accordingly, the Department expects organizations identified in Section 1(2)(c)
of SB 44 to act independently from any donors in their nature, structure, sponsorship, and
funding, ensuring that the determination of an insured’s eligibility for assistance does not depend
directly or indirectly on the insured’s use of any particular provider or service.
In construing the Act, the Department will review funding from health care providers to an
organization to ensure that:
• The organization does not function as a conduit for payments or other benefits from the
insurer to the provider;
• The health care provider does not impermissibly influence the insured’s choice of
services through the organization;
• The health care provider does not exert any direct or indict influence or control over the
assistance provided to insureds; and
• The organization is not providing assistance to insureds in a manner that facilitates undue
increases in costs to the health plan.
Please contact the Department at (502) 564-6026 with any questions about this Advisory Opinion.