KY Insurance Advisory Opinion 1999-08
Any Willing Provider Law
The following Advisory Opinion is to advise the reader of the current position of the Kentucky
Department of Insurance ("the Department") on the specified issue. The Advisory Opinion is not legally
binding on either the Department or the reader.
Kentucky Department of Insurance
Advisory Opinion 99-08
In re: Any Willing Provider Law
RELEVANT FACTS AND STATUTES: Recently the Department has seen some issues regarding the
application of the any willing provider law. The statutes involved are KRS 304.17A-005(17), 304.17A-
005(18), 304.17A-005(22), 304.17A-270, and 304.17A-525.
DEPARTMENT’S POSITION: KRS 304.17A-270 contains the any willing provider law. The statute says:
A health insurer shall not discriminate against any provider who is located within the geographic
coverage area of the health plan and is willing to meet the terms and conditions for
participation established by the health insurer, including the Kentucky State Medicaid program
and Medicaid partnerships.
The first step is to determine if the plan with which the provider seeks to contract is a health benefit
plan [defined in KRS 304.17A-005(17)] offered by an insurer [defined in KRS 304.17A-005(22)]. If step
one is satisfied, the second step is to determine if the provider seeking a contract with the health
benefit plan is included in the definition of provider found in KRS 304.17A-005(18). Finally, if the first
two steps are met and the provider is located in the geographic coverage area of the health benefit plan,
the provider cannot be excluded if he/she is willing to meet the terms and conditions of contracting with
the insurer.
KRS 304.17A-525 requires insurers to develop relevant, objective standards for initial consideration of
providers and for providers to continue as a participating provider in the health benefit plan. It requires
the terms and conditions to be based on relevant, objective standards.
The Department considers standards to be relevant and objective if the standards are uniformly applied
to all providers within a given provider category (e.g., physicians) and based upon criteria that are
reasonably related to the provider category for the provision of services. Examples include, but are not
limited to, medical licensure, specialty board certification, medical malpractice history, valid DEA
number, and hospital privileges.
The Department considers standards to not be relevant and objective if the standards are based upon
criteria that are not reasonably related to the provision of services by that provider category. Examples
include, but are not limited to, required membership in a certain professional organization, professional
enhancements, a medical degree from a certain university, a certain age, race, gender, sexual
orientation and disability. The Department considers limiting the number of providers in a provider
category, based upon the determination that the insurer's network is adequate to be contrary to the
law.
The Department will consider all circumstances in determining if standards are relevant and objective.
The examples listed above are not an exclusive list. The Department may determine that a particular
term and condition is not based on relevant and objective criteria, and in violation of the any willing
provider law, based on a reason other than listed in this Advisory Opinion. This Opinion is intended to
serve as a guide for plans in developing terms and conditions.
During the litigation in Health Maintenance Organization Association of Kentucky, Inc. et al. v. George
Nichols III, Civil Action No. 97-24 the Department was precluded from enforcing the statute because the
Court issued a stay on the enforcement of the law. However, the case was decided in the Department’s
favor in August of 1998 and the stay is no longer in effect. The Department is now enforcing the any
willing provider law.
Any questions concerning this matter may be directed to Shaun T. Orme, Counsel for the Department at
(502)564-6032.
___________________________________
George Nichols III
Commissioner
____________________________________
Date