KY Insurance Advisory Opinion 2011-04
Non-Admitted Insurance on Multi-State Risks - HB 167
1
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Frankfort, Kentucky
ADVISORY OPINION
2011-04
The following Advisory Opinion is to advise the reader of the current position of the
Kentucky Department of Insurance (the “Department”) on the specified issue. The
Advisory Opinion is not legally binding on either the Department or the reader.
TO:
ALL SURPLUS LINES BROKERS TRANSACTING NON-ADMITTED
INSURANCE ON MULTI-STATE RISKS
FROM:
SHARON P. CLARK, COMMISSIONER
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
DATE:
JUNE 3, 2011
RE:
NON-ADMITTED INSURANCE ON MULTI-STATE RISKS – HB 167
************************************************************************
The 111th United States Congress enacted the Non-Admitted and Reinsurance
Reform Act of 2010, Title V, Subtitle B of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, referred to hereinafter as NRRA. NRRA established certain
rules and requirements regarding the placement of non-admitted insurance business on
multi-state risks. In particular, NRRA specified that no state, other than the Home State
of an insured, may require any premium tax payment for non-admitted insurance. NRRA
further suggested that each state adopt nationwide uniform requirements, forms, and
procedures, such as an interstate compact, that provide for the reporting, payment,
collection, and allocation of premium taxes for non-admitted insurance. NRRA becomes
effective July 21, 2011.
During the 2010 Kentucky General Assembly, HB 167 was enacted. This bill
authorizes the State of Kentucky to become a Compacting State and to comply with the
2
rules and requirements established by the Surplus Lines Insurance Multi-State
Compliance Compact Commission (the “Commission”).
Sections 2, 3, and 4 of HB 167 amend provisions of KRS 91A.080, KRS 136.392
and 304.10-180 to establish one uniform tax rate that would apply to non-admitted
insurance on multi-state risks. This uniform tax rate is in lieu of separate taxes imposed
by local governments, the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet, and the Department of Insurance.
Section 5 of HB 167 provides that Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the bill will take effect only
upon the following:
1. Legislative enactment of the compact into law by two compacting states; and
2. The Commission becomes effective, which shall occur when:
a. There are a total of ten compacting and contracting states; or
b. There are compacting and contracting states representing greater than
40% of the surplus lines insurance premium volume based on records
of the percentage of surplus lines insurance.
At the time of publication of this Advisory Opinion, Sections 2, 3, and 4 are not
effective and are not expected to become effective by June 8, 2011, the date that most
legislation passed by the 2010 Kentucky General Assembly will be effective.
Consequently, this Advisory Opinion clarifies the Department’s expectations up to and
until Sections 2, 3, and 4 of HB 167 become effective. This Advisory Opinion also
outlines those provisions of NRRA that preempt current Kentucky state law governing
non-admitted insurance on multi-state risks.
After July 21, 2011, NRRA preempts the following provisions of Kentucky law:
1. Home State
NRRA provides that the placement of non-admitted insurance shall be subject to
the statutory and regulatory requirements solely of the insured’s Home State1.
This provision of the NRRA prevents the Kentucky Department of Insurance
from applying provisions of KRS Chapter 304, Subtitle 10 to non-admitted
insurance or surplus lines transactions where Kentucky is not the Home State of
the insurance risk. Rather, the statutory and regulatory requirements of the
insured’s Home State will govern these transactions.
1 Home State is defined as (1) the state in which an insured maintains its principal place of business or, in
the case of an individual, the individual’s principal residence or (2) if 100% of the insured risk is located
outside of the principal place of business or resident state, the state to which the greatest percentage of the
insured's taxable premium for that insurance contract is allocated.
3
2. Licensure Requirements
NRRA provides that no state, other and an insured’s Home State, may require a
surplus lines broker to be licensed in order to sell, solicit, or negotiate nonadmitted insurance with respect to such insured.
Kentucky law at KRS 304.10-040 provides that if certain insurance coverages
cannot be procured from authorized insurers, such coverage may be procured
from unauthorized (or non-admitted) insurers provided the insurance must be
procured through a licensed surplus lines broker. KRS 304.10-040 is preempted
by NRRA to the extent that Kentucky can no longer require a surplus lines broker
license where Kentucky is not the “Home State” and where the non-admitted
insurance risk is only partially located in Kentucky.
3. Exempt Commercial Purchaser
NRRA provides that a surplus lines broker seeking to procure or place nonadmitted insurance in a state for an exempt commercial purchaser2,3 shall not be
required to satisfy any state requirement to make a diligent search to determine
whether the full amount or type of insurance sought by such exempt commercial
purchaser can be obtained from admitted insurers if:
a. The broker procuring or placing the surplus lines insurance has
disclosed to the exempt commercial purchaser that such insurance may
or may not be available from the admitted market that may provide
greater protection with more regulatory oversight; and
b. The exempt commercial purchaser has subsequently requested in
writing the broker to procure or place such insurance from a nonadmitted insurer.
2 An “exempt commercial purchaser” is defined by the NRRA as any person purchasing commercial
insurance that, at the time of placement, meets the following requirements:
a.
The person employs or retains a qualified risk manager to negotiate insurance coverage;
b.
The person has paid aggregate nationwide commercial property and casualty insurance premiums
in excess of $100,000 in the immediately preceding 12 months;
c.
The person meets at least one of the following criteria:
i.
The person possess a net worth in excess of $20 million, as adjusted in accordance with
the footnote 3;
ii.
The person generates annual revenues in excess of $50 million, as adjusted in accordance
with footnote 3.
iii.
The person employees more than 500 full-time equivalent employees per individual
insured or is a member of an affiliated group employing more than 1,000 employees in
the aggregate;
iv.
The person is a not-for-profit organization or public entity generating annual budgeted
expenditures of at least $30 million, as adjusted in accordance with footnote 3; or
v.
The person is a municipality with a population in excess of 50,000 persons.
3 Adjustment: Effective on the fifth January 1 occurring after the date of the enactment of [the NRRA] and
each fifth January 1 occurring thereafter, the amounts in c.i, c.ii, and c.iv. of footnote 2 above shall be
adjusted to reflect the percentage change for such 5-year period in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor.
4
Kentucky law, at KRS 304.10-040(2) requires that a diligent effort be made to
procure insurance on all risks from among the insurers authorized to transact and
actually write that kind and class of insurance before an insurance risk may be
procured from the non-admitted market. To the extent that a prospective insured
meets the definition of an exempt commercial purchaser, Kentucky’s due
diligence requirement in 304.10-040 is preempted.
Further, Kentucky law at KRS 304.11-020(2)(c) provides a definition of an
exempt commercial policyholder. The definitions of an exempt commercial
purchaser under the NRRA and an exempt commercial policyholder under
Kentucky law differ slightly. To the extent that an insured meets the definition of
an exempt commercial purchaser under the NRRA, federal law will govern the
multi-state non-admitted insurance transaction covering the exempt commercial
policyholder. In this event, the surplus lines broker placing the coverage shall
comply with the taxation requirements applicable to other multi-state nonadmitted insurance transactions.
4. Taxation on Non-Admitted Insurance on Multi-State Risks
NRRA provides that the placement of non-admitted insurance shall be subject to
the statutory and regulatory requirements solely of the insured’s Home State.
Kentucky law, at KRS 304.10-180, provides that each surplus lines broker shall
pay a 3% surplus lines tax, a premium surcharge tax in accordance with KRS
136.392, and local government premium taxes in accordance with KRS 91A.080
on surplus lines insurance placed with an unauthorized insurer. KRS 304.10-
180(2) provides that if a surplus lines policy covers risks or exposures only
partially in the State of Kentucky, the tax payable shall be computed upon the
proportion of the premium which is properly allocable to the risks or exposures
located in Kentucky. To the extent that Kentucky is not the “Home State,” the
taxes imposed by KRS 304.10-180 are preempted. However, where Kentucky is
the Home State, the taxes imposed by KRS 304.10-180 are applicable on the
premium associated with the entire multi-state risk. KRS 304.10-180(2) related to
the apportionment of premium on multi-state risks is preempted by NRRA in its
entirety.
Section 1, Article IV of HB 167 provides that each compacting state may charge
its own rate of taxation on the premium allocated to such state based on the
applicable Allocation Formula provided that the state establishes one single rate
of taxation applicable to all non-admitted insurance transactions on multi-state
risks. When the Commission becomes effective, Sections 2, 3, and 4 of HB 167
establish one tax rate of 11.8% applicable to non-admitted insurance on multistate risks. The surplus lines broker will be required to collect this tax and remit it
to the Department of Insurance.
5
Questions regarding this Advisory Opinion may be directed to the Property &
Casualty Division at (502) 564-6046.
/s/ Sharon P. Clark .
Sharon P. Clark, Commissioner
Kentucky Department of Insurance
On this 3rd day of June, 2011