KY Insurance Advisory Opinion 2012-05
Co-Pay Parity
1
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
OFFICE OF INSURANCE
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY
ADVISORY OPINION
2012-05
The following Advisory Opinion is to advise the reader of the current position of the Kentucky
Department of Insurance (the “Department”) on the specified issue. The Advisory Opinion is not
legally binding on either the Department or the reader.
TO:
ALL HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT
BUSINESS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
FROM:
SHARON P. CLARK, COMMISSIONER KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF
INSURANCE
RE:
CO-PAY PARITY
DATE:
JULY 26, 2012
* * * * * * * * * *
On June 8, 2011, KRS 304.17A-177 went into effect. That statute established certain
limitations on the amount of copayment or coinsurance that can be charged for services rendered
by occupational or physical therapists. Following the enactment of KRS 304.17A-177, the
Department has received complaints and inquiries regarding the extent of the statutorily-prescribed
limitations and the application thereof. Specifically, there is a question as to whether the
copayment/coinsurance limitation only applies to services rendered by occupational or physical
therapists during an office visits, or whether it applies to all services rendered by occupational or
physical therapists, regardless of the nature of the services rendered.
2
KRS 304.17A-177(1) states,
[A]n insurer shall not impose a copayment or coinsurance amount charged
to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by an
occupational therapist licensed under KRS Chapter 319A or a physical
therapist licensed under KRS Chapter 327 that is greater than the
copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for the services
of a physician or an osteopath licensed under KRS Chapter 311 for an
office visit.
The inquiries regarding this statute stem from the reference to an “office visit” at the end
of section (1). Insurers have interpreted this reference in such a way as to limit the application of
the statute only to “office visits” where an occupational or physical therapist evaluates or reevaluates the insured. Under this interpretation, copay parity exists only for “office visits” and
all other services provided by occupational or physical therapist fall outside the purview of KRS
304.17A.177, leaving insurers free to establish whatever copay is deemed appropriate.
It is a well-settled principal of statutory interpretation that words must be assigned their
plain meaning and should not be construed in such a way as to add restrictive language where
none exists. See, Bailey v. Reeves, 662 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. 1984). By interpreting KRS 304.17A-
177(1) as set forth above, insurers have greatly restricted the application of the statute. The
services to which the statute applies are: “services rendered for each date of service by an
occupational therapist licensed under KRS Chapter 319A or a physical therapist licensed under
KRS Chapter 327.” (Emphasis added). There is no language whatsoever which limits
application of the statute only to office visits where an occupational or physical therapist
evaluates or re-evaluates the insured. Nor is there any language which suggests that copay parity
is only meant to exist for corresponding services, i.e. copays for office visits with occupational or
physical therapists cannot exceed copays for office visits with physicians or osteopaths. The
reference in the statute to an “office visit” is only meant to give context to the maximum amount
that insurers are permitted to charge as a copayment. Per the statute, insurers shall not impose a
copayment or coinsurance that exceeds the copayment or coinsurance amount charged by
physicians or osteopaths for an office visit. That language establishes a cap on the amount of the
copayment or coinsurance but does not modify or restrict the scope of occupational or physical
therapy services covered by the statute.
Based on the above, the Department interprets KRS 304.17A-177(1) to apply to all
services rendered by occupational or physical therapists, regardless of the nature of those
services or the environment in which they are offered.
3
Please contact the Department’s Health and Life Division at (502) 564-6088 with
questions about the Advisory Opinion.
/s/ Sharon P. Clark _
Sharon P. Clark, Commissioner
Department of Insurance