00-0103
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0103
April 19, 2000
OPINION 00-103
Mr. Jeffrey L. Wesley
Chief of Police
P.O. Box 847
Denham Springs, LA 70726
Dear Chief Wesley:
This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General in regard to
receiving compensation as the director of E911 for Livingston Parish Communications
District while serving as police chief for the City of Denham Springs.
You state that you are the appointed Chief of Police for the City of Denham Springs in
civil service. You also state that as the director of the Parish Communication District you
oversee the day-to-day operations of E911 which entails coordination of assignments,
implementation of software and equipment, hearing citizen's complaints, public education
and quality control. For the latter position you have received no compensation except a
per diem for attendance at monthly meetings as a member of the Livingston Parish
Communication District.
Accordingly, you ask whether you can receive compensation from the parish
communication district while being paid as Chief of Police by the City of Denham Springs.
We note in R.S. 33:9101 the governing authority of any parish may by ordinance create
communications districts which shall be a political subdivision of the state. When a
district is created in a parish, the governing authority may appoint a board of commis-
sioners or may serve as the governing authority of a district, and has the authority to
employ such employees as deemed necessary.
Pertinent to your inquiry are the provisions of R.S. 42:63(E) which provide as follows:
No person holding a full-time appointive office or full-time employment in
the government of this state or of a political subdivision thereof shall at the
same time hold another full-time appointive office or full-time employment in
the government of the state of Louisiana, in the government of a political
subdivision thereof, or in a combination of these. (Emphasis added.)
Mr. Jeffrey L. Wesley
OPINION 00-103
Page 2
Therefore, there would be no prohibition as an appointed Chief of Police in holding a
"part-time" appointive office or employment in the government of this State or a political
subdivision thereof. However, "full-time" and "part-time" must be determined in
accordance with the definitions set forth in R.S. 42:62(4) and (5) of the dual officeholding
statute which provide as follow:
(4) "Full time" means the period of time which a person normally works or
is expected to work in an appointive office or employment and which is at
least seven hours per day of work and at least thirty-five hours per week of
work.
(5) "Part time" means the period of time which a person normally works or
is expected to work in an appointive office or employment which is less than
the number of hours of work defined in this Section as full time.
We hope this sufficiently answers your inquiry, but if we can be further assistance, do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Attorney General
By:_________________________
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General
RPI/bbr
Mr. Jeffrey L. Wesley
OPINION 00-103
Page 3
OPINION 00-103
78 - Officers - Dual Officeholding
R.S. 42:62
R.S. 42:63
R.S. 33:9101
There is no prohibition as appointed Chief of Police in holding a "part-time" appointive
office or employment as the director of E911, but a full-time position is prohibited.
Mr. Jeffrey L. Wesley
Chief of Police
P.O. Box 847
Denham Springs, LA 70726
Date Received: March 13, 2000
Date Released: April 19, 2000
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General