Summary Information Not Available

August 9, 2000 OPINION 00-223 Honorable Larry G. Cox Sheriff & Ex-Officio Tax Collector Parish of Madison 100 North Cedar Street Tallulah, LA 71282-3891 Dear Mr. Cox: This office is in receipt of your opinion request wherein you asked the following question: May the sheriff require the payment of a bond fee in accordance with R.S. 33:1432(9) when an officer accepts a promise to appear on a traffic violation which releases the alleged offender on his own recognizance? The provisions of Louisiana Driver’s License Law, LSA-R.S. 32:411.1 et seq. will govern our response to the aforementioned question. Note that this statute was enacted after Attorney General Opinion 91-289 which stated in pertinent part that the sheriff could not collect an appearance bond authorized by R.S. 33:1432(9). LSA-R.S. 32:411.1A(4) states in pertinent part: Whenever any person who resides in this state is arrested and charged with a violation of the Louisiana Highway Regulatory Act or any municipal or parish ordinance regulating traffic in any parish or municipality such person shall be released on his own recognizance upon signing the promise to appear section of the traffic citation. This shall only apply to such persons who are not wanted for failure to appear in connection with other traffic citations or for whom a warrant has been issued for any other reason. If the offender fails to pay the fine by mail in advance of adjudication and fails to appear at the time and date indicated on the citation, the court may impose an additional penalty in an amount not to exceed the amount of the fine for the original violation. OPINION 00-223 8 BONDS – Surety LSA-R.S. 32: 411; LSA-R.S. 32:411.1 We conclude that the legislative intent was to not allow the sheriff to collect a bond fee when an offender signs the promise to appear section on a traffic citation. Honorable Larry G. Cox OPINION 00-223 Page 2 The law permits the court to add additional fees if the named defendant does not pay the fine by mail, in advance of adjudication, nor appear at the time indicated in the citation. However, the statute does not permit the collection of a bond fee when the offender is being released on his own recognizance upon signing the promise to appear section of the citation. Therefore having the offender pay a bond fee would be inconsistent with the overall effect of R.S. 32:411.1. For this reason it is our opinion that the legislative intent was to not allow the sheriff to collect a bond fee when an offender signs the promise to appear section on a traffic citation. Very truly yours, RICHARD P. IEYOUB ATTORNEY GENERAL BY:__________________________ MARTY WHITE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION 00-223 8 BONDS – Surety LSA-R.S. 32: 411; LSA-R.S. 32:411.1 We conclude that the legislative intent was to not allow the sheriff to collect a bond fee when an offender signs the promise to appear section on a traffic citation. Honorable Larry G. Cox Sheriff & Ex-officio Tax Collector Parish of Madison 100 North Cedar Street Tallulah, LA 71282-3891 Date Received: Date Released: August 9, 2000 MARTY WHITE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL