00-0276
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0276
November 17, 2000
Opinion 00-276
Honorable Jimmy Dove
Shreveport City Marshal
Municipal Courts Building
1244 Texas Avenue
Shreveport, LA 71101
Dear Mr. Dove:
This office is in receipt of your opinion request wherein you asked,
“Whether a judge can sentence a defendant to house arrest in lieu of jail on a
driving while intoxicated conviction when the offender’s blood alcohol content is
.15 or over?”
The statute that governs operating a vehicle while intoxicated is La. R.S.
14:98. As defined in La. R.S. 14.2(6), a “misdemeanor” is any crime other than a
felony. La. R.S. 14:2(4) defines a “felony” as any crime for which an offender
may be sentenced to death or imprisonment at hard labor. Under La R.S.
14:98(B)(1), a first offender is not subject to imprisonment at hard labor.
Therefore, first offense D.W.I. is a misdemeanor.
La R.S. 14:98(B)(2) states in pertinent part:
B(2) If the offender had a blood alcohol concentration
of 0.15 percent or more . . . at least forty-eight hours
of the sentence imposed pursuant to Paragraph B(1)
of this Section shall be served without the benefit of
parole, probation, or suspended sentence.
Article 894.2 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure was enacted to
give the courts discretion in sentencing an offender to home incarceration in lieu
of imprisonment. La. C.Cr.P. 894.2 provides in part:
A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law to the
contrary, a defendant may be sentenced to home
incarceration in lieu of imprisonment under the
following conditions:
Honorable Jimmy Dove
Opinion 00-276
Page 2
(1) The defendant is eligible for probation or was
convicted
of
a
misdemeanor
or
a
felony
punishable with or without hard labor.
* * *
(3) The court determines that home incarceration of
the defendant is more suitable than imprisonment
or
supervised
probation
without
home
incarceration.
Since the sentencing provisions of La. R.S. 14:98 (B)(1) indicate that a
first conviction is considered a misdemeanor offense, a first offender may be
sentenced to home incarceration according to the provisions of La.C.Cr.P. Art.
894.2(A)(1).
When the Louisiana Legislature amended La R.S. 14:98 by Acts 1999,
No. 1292, adding Section (B)(2), the amendment included no provision which
would have prohibited the court from sentencing a first offender with a blood
alcohol concentration of 0.15 percent or more to home incarceration in lieu of
imprisonment for the forty-eight hours mandated under La. R.S. 14:98(B)(2). The
lack of a specific provision removing the court’s authority to sentence a
defendant to home incarceration under La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.2 implies that the
legislature did not intend to exclude the possibility of home incarceration where a
defendant is sentenced under La. R.S. 14:98(B)(2).
This conclusion is further supported by the sentencing provisions of
La. R.S. 14:98 (C)(1) and (C)(2) governing convictions for second offense D.W.I.
Section (C)(1) requires that at least forty-eight hours of the minimum thirty-day
sentence be served without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of
sentence. However, Section (C)(1) specifically states, “[n]othing herein shall
prohibit a court from sentencing a defendant to home incarceration, if otherwise
allowed under the provisions of Article 894.2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.”
La. R.S. 14:98(C)(2), also enacted in 1999, contains mandatory
sentencing provisions for second offense D.W.I. which increase the time that
must be served to ninety-six hours when the offender has a blood alcohol
concentration of 0.15 percent or more. Section (C)(2) makes no reference to that
portion of Section (C)(1) which specifically allows for home incarceration in lieu of
the mandatory forty-eight hours in jail required by Section (C)(1).
Honorable Jimmy Dove
Opinion 00-276
Page 3
A conviction under La. R.S. 14:98(C) for second offense D.W.I. is
obviously a more serious offense than a conviction under La. R.S. 14:98(B), as
evidenced by the increased penalties for a second offense. Home incarceration
is available in lieu of the minimum forty-eight hours which a defendant must
serve under La. R.S. 14:98(C)(1) and it appears that a defendant sentenced
under La. R.S. 14:98(C)(2) is also eligible for home incarceration.
If a defendant convicted of second offense D.W.I. may be sentenced to
home incarceration instead of mandatory jail time, then it would be illogical to
conclude that the legislature intended to exclude the option of home incarceration
in sentencing a first offender under La. R.S. 14:98(B)(2). That interpretation of
the statute is further supported by the absence of any specific provision in La.
R.S. 14:98(B)(2) prohibiting the sentence of home incarceration in lieu of the
minimum forty-eight hours a defendant must serve.
Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that when a defendant is
sentenced in accordance with the provisions of La. R.S. 14:98(B)(2), the court is
not prohibited from imposing a sentence of home incarceration under La. C.Cr.P.
art. 894.2 in lieu of the mandatory forty-eight hours which must be served without
benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: _______________________
JULIE COLLINS
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
OPINION 00-276
16
CRIMINAL LAW – CRIMES & OFFENSES
La. R.S. 14:98; La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.2
Because
the
Louisiana
Legislature
made
no
specific
provisions
in
La. R.S. 14:98(B)(2) prohibiting the sentence of home incarceration in lieu of the
minimum forty-eight hours a defendant must serve, the only logical conclusion is
that home incarceration under La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.2 is a legal sentence for a
misdemeanor first under La. R.S. 14:98(B).
Honorable Jimmy Dove
Shreveport City Marshal
Municipal Courts Building
1244 Texas Avenue
Shreveport, LA 71101
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE RELEASED: November 17, 2000
JULIE COLLINS
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL