00-0293
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0293
December 13, 2000
OPINION 00-293
Mr. William E. Tilley
District Attorney
30th Judicial District
P.O. Box 1188
Leesville, LA 71446
Dear District Attorney Tilley:
This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General in regard to
the legality of certain of the provisions of your General Office Policy. Specifically, you
question the following provisions:
5. COMPENSATORY TIME OR PAY
Effective January 1, 1997, the District Attorney and all full-time employees
can elect to receive either compensatory time or compensatory pay for each
hour worked in excess of seven hours per day computed by calendar month.
Compensatory pay will be paid at 150% of the hourly rate of pay of that
person's gross annual salary divided by 1820 (52 x35) hours. One and one-
half (1 - 1/2) hours compensatory time will be awarded for each hour worked
in excess of thirty-five (35) hours per week or fraction thereof.
Compensatory time can be accumulated and taken as vacation time or, if
elected, compensatory pay can be paid annually or upon resignation,
termination of employment, or retirement. Effective February 1, 2000
compensatory time or compensatory pay will be computed and paid for each
hour worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day computed by calendar
month.
33. REIMBURSEMENT FOR LEGAL FEES AND COURT COSTS
A. If the District Attorney or an assistant district attorney is sued either in his
individual capacity or official capacity, or if he is named as a party in a lawsuit
during or after his tenure in office due to events occurring during his
employment or term of office and an attorney is retained to represent his
interests, the Office of District Attorney, Thirtieth Judicial District, will
District Attorney William E. Tilley
OPINION 00-293
Page 2
reimburse to him for all legal fees, court costs, and related expenses incurred
by the District Attorney or assistant district attorney.
The Office of District Attorney should make every reasonable effort to obtain
reimbursement of the fees and costs from the Vernon Parish Criminal Court
Fund in appropriate cases.
B. Any full time employee, assistant district attorney and/or the District
Attorney shall be entitled to collect all legal fees, court costs, and related
expenses incurred by him to enforce these provisions which are made
retroactive and effective on January 1, 1997. These provisions are
applicable whether legal proceedings arise during or after cessation of
employment.
C. These provisions concerning legal representation will not be applicable if
full legal representation is made available through insurance policies carried
by the Office of District Attorney.
With respect to Sec. 5 (Compensatory Time or Pay) of your general office policy, this office
has recognized that under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 USC 201 et seq, that overtime
is generally required unless the employee is excepted by law, and there are several
exemptions. It was noted in Atty. Gen. Op. No. 94-144 that one exemption is for a
"professional" who is employed at an annual salary, as opposed to an hourly wage earner.
In the latter opinion, this office further observed as follows:
However, even if exempted by the FLSA, this office believes that the case of
Knecht v. Board of Trustees, 591 So. 2d 690 (1991) is applicable and
dispositive of the instant matter. In Knecht, certain unclassified state
employees sued the Board of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities
for payment of compensatory time. The plaintiffs in the case accrued
compensatory time under the Board's policy which was an implementation of
an Executive Order. The Board some years later suspended its policy.
Plaintiffs, thereafter, neither accrued compensatory nor took compensatory
leave but the accrued leave remained noted on their check stubs. Plaintiffs
later sued for payment of compensatory leave.
The court in Knecht held that, under the above facts among others, once an
employee worked overtime pursuant to the compensatory leave policy, a
bilateral contract was complete, and the Board was obligated to grant paid
leave subject only to the approval of the employer as to the particular time at
which the leave was to be taken. Knecht, supra 694.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
District Attorney William E. Tilley
OPINION 00-293
Page 3
Under Knecht, unclassified employees herein had a right to accrue and use
compensatory leave under the regulations attached hereto. The employees
by the performance of work under the terms contained therein obtained a
vested right to its accrual and use.
Similarly, in Atty. Gen. Op. No. 98-144 this office was in receipt of a request concerning the
Fair Labor Standards Act and overtime compensation for a court employee. The court
employed an Information Systems Analysts who was informed he would receive overtime
compensation. This office concluded that the employee as a computer systems analyst
would fall within the exemption for a professional under the Fair Labor Standards Act , but
with reliance upon Knecht, supra, noted that the employee was told when hired he would
be paid overtime, a binding contract was formed and he was owed overtime from the date
of his employment until the effective date of the new policy that provided all Information
Systems Analyst were exempt under FLSA. This office stated that when an employer
leads an employee to reasonably expect to receive compensatory time off or payment a
binding contract was formed, and the subject employee is owed overtime compensation.
Therefore, following the reasoning of the court and opinions of this office, we would
conclude while attorneys in the District Attorney's office would be exempt from overtime
compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a contract may be established to
provide for such payments. However, we do not find that the District Attorney could make
such a commitment that would require payment by the state or the parish governing
authority who by statute is obligated for the salaries. However, this office has determined
that the Criminal Court Fund could be used for the expenses of the office of the District
Attorney, including salaries, finding that there could be very little doubt that supplemental
pay for district attorneys and his assistants can be a necessary expense of that office.
Atty. Gen. Op. No. 87-244.
District Attorney William E. Tilley
OPINION 00-293
Page 4
Accordingly, we find that overtime compensation for the Assistant District Attorneys may be
paid under agreement by the District Attorney with the Assistant District Attorneys despite
that there is an exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act. However, the overtime for
the District Attorney himself cannot be considered a bilateral binding agreement when
simply included in the General Office Policy. In light of the statutory law establishing the
salary of the District Attorney, we cannot conclude that overtime for the District Attorney
can be termed a necessary expense of the office by including it in the General Office
Policy. Payment of overtime for the District Attorney would require the agreement of the
parish governing authority to constitute a bilateral agreement to remove the District
Attorney from the exemption that otherwise denies him overtime as a professional under
FLSA.
With respect to Section 33 [Reimbursement for legal fees and court costs] of your office
policy, as written, the policy is a contract between the District Attorney's office and the
employee. Said contract provides greater coverage than the state presently provides to its
employees under R.S. 13:5108.1 et seq. As you are aware, the District Attorney's office is
not covered under R.S. 13:5108.1 et seq.; R.S. 42:1441 et seq. provides requirements for
insurance coverage for certain public officers, including the district attorney.
While it is our opinion that the District Attorney's office may choose to provide greater or
different coverage to its employees, it is also our opinion that Article 7, Section 14 of the
1974 Louisiana Constitution may not be violated in doing so. In this regard, the District
Attorney would be prohibited from providing coverage to his employees for any non-job
related activity or liability. Thus, the present policy should be amended to clarify that
coverage is only extended to the employee while he is engaged in the performance of the
duties of his office or employment. See for example, R.S. 13:5108.1, as amended by
Louisiana Acts 2000, First Extraordinary Session, No. 65, enclosed herein for your
information and review.
We hope this sufficiently answers your inquiry.
Sincerely yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Attorney General
By:____________________________
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General
.
District Attorney William E. Tilley
OPINION 00-293
Page 5
OPINION 00-293
22 District & Prosecuting Attorneys
R.S. 13:5108.1
Overtime compensation may be
paid Assistant District Attorneys
by contract agreement , but
overtime for the District Attorney
would require agreement with the
parish governing authority to
be a bilateral agreement.
Mr. William E. Tilley
District Attorney
30th Judicial District
P.O. Box 1188
Leesville, LA 71446
Date Received: Aug. 29, 2000
Date Released: December 13, 2000
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General