00-0331
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0331
November 16, 2000
OPINION NUMBER 00-331
Ms. Myra M. Kattengill
Clerk of Council
St. Bernard Parish Council
8201 West Judge Perez Drive
Chalmette, Louisiana 70043
Dear Ms. Kattengill:
On behalf of the St. Bernard Parish Council, you have requested an opinion of this
office regarding a salary increase recently taken by the Parish President. According to
your correspondence, the St. Bernard Parish President, Mr. Charles Ponstein,
increased his annual salary of $45,000 to $70,000. This action was apparently taken
sometime in June, and was made retroactive to January 10, 2000, the date of the
commencement of the Mr. Ponstein’s second consecutive term of office as Parish
President.
According to your correspondence, the Saint Bernard Parish Home Rule Charter, at
Article III, Executive Branch, Section 3-04(A), Compensation, pertinently provides:
“The salary of the first president elected under this charter shall be
$45,000.00 per annum. The council may by ordinance increase or
decrease the salary for the office of parish president provided that such an
increase or decrease shall not become effective during any term of the
current parish president at the time of the adoption of such an ordinance.”
On December 15, 1998, you advise that the St. Bernard Council adopted Ordinance
SBPC #403-12-98, which became effective on January 31, 1999. That ordinance
amended the St. Bernard Parish Code of Ordinances to add section 2-6, entitled Parish
President’s Salary, which section pertinently provides:
“(a) That the salary of the Parish President shall be increased to 70,000
per annum.
(b) Such an increase shall not become effective during any term of the
current parish president at the time of the adoption of this ordinance.”
Specifically, the Council requests that this office address the following three questions:
(1) “Do the provisions of the St. Bernard Parish Home Rule Charter bind upon Mr.
Ponstein, the second parish president to serve under the charter, currently serving
out his second term of office since January 10, 2000?”
90-A-2 Public Funds - Loan, Pledge or Grants
Pertains to salary increase of the St. Bernard Parish
President.
Opinion Number 00-331
Ms. Myra M. Kattengill, Clerk of Council
St. Bernard Parish Council
Page -2-
(2) “Is Mr. Ponstein’s unilateral action raising his salary in conflict with Ordinance SBPC
#403-12-98, adopted December 15, 1998 as Mr. Ponstein was the parish president
at the time the ordinance was adopted as is evident by his signature on the
ordinance?”
(3) “Can a governing authority retroactively pay an elected public official under the
provisions of State Law?”
In response to your first question, we interpret the language of the St. Bernard Parish
Home Rule Charter and ordinance as cited above to mean that no pay raise for the
parish president may be effective during the current term in which the pay raise is
enacted. However, a pay raise may be effective prospectively for the new term for which
the parish president is re-elected. We do not believe the drafters of the home rule
charter intended to permanently freeze the compensation of a president who could be
re-elected for a number of terms. In such a case, a president would never be eligible for
a pay increase as long as he was in office.
Regarding the second issue, the president’s action was not unilateral but was consistent
with and authorized by the parish ordinance as cited above. Obviously, the council
intended the parish president’s compensation to be increased for the new term
beginning January of 2000 regardless if the then (in 1998) parish president was re-
elected or whether a new successor became parish president. The language of the
ordinance tracks the home rule charter provisions and our interpretation, in answer to
your first question, likewise applies to the ordinance.
Thirdly, looking at the facts presented, the council’s ordinance became effective and
operative with the beginning of the new term in January of 2000. Thus, there was no
retroactivity involved and the parish president was merely collecting the salary due to
him from the beginning of the new term.
We trust the foregoing sufficiently addresses your concerns. Please do not hesitate to
contact us if we can be of assistance to you or the Parish of St. Bernard in the future.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Attorney General
RPI/jrw
OPINION NUMBER 00-331
Syllabus
90-A-2 Public Funds - Loan, Pledge or Grants
Pertains to salary increase of the St. Bernard Parish President.
Ms. Myra M. Kattengill
Clerk of Council
St. Bernard Parish Council
8201 West Judge Perez Drive
Chalmette, Louisiana 70043
Date Received:
Date Released: November 16, 2000
Richard P. Ieyoub
Attorney General