LAC 46:I.2209. Review Criteria

A. The board’s assessment of proposals submitted will be based upon the proposal's effectiveness in integrating practice and education and upon: 1. outcomes—statements of specific, measurable, and realistic changes that will result from the board award; 2. integration—creation of innovative and effective concepts and methods to integrate non-faculty architect practitioners in the education of students in significant and meaningful ways; 3. impact—achievement of immediate and continuing impact on student education and development and the architecture curriculum and response to specific needs of the students, the school, the institution, and the profession; 4. effectiveness—effectiveness in raising student awareness of issues central to practice and the architect’s responsibility for health, safety, and welfare and responding to relevant issues identified through the NCARB Architectural Experience Program (AXP) or the NCARB architect registration exam; 5. participation—proposed student participation, level of participation, and description of impact on project participants. Student reach should be as broad as possible; and 6. budget—effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposed budget in relation to project goals and the criteria set forth herein.